DNA discovery illustrates creation's ...

DNA discovery illustrates creation's complexity

There are 15 comments on the World Magazine story from Jan 7, 2014, titled DNA discovery illustrates creation's complexity. In it, World Magazine reports that:

Researchers have found a second layer of information embedded in DNA, refueling a debate between proponents of Darwinism and intelligent design.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at World Magazine.

Level 2

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#1 Jan 8, 2014
Information theory destroys the astronomical luck theory
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#2 Jan 9, 2014
As usual you're speaking out of pure ignorance. "Astronomical luck theory" is nothing more than your dishonest caricature of abiogenesis and equating it with "random chance". Also, there is nothing in ANY form of science which supports the notion "Goddidit with magic".

Another thing worth pointing out, is that the liars for Jesus website is talking through it's azz as usual, as there is nothing in this discovery which supports creationism or in fact puts common ancestry into doubt.
Level 6

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#3 Jan 9, 2014
The Dude wrote:
Also, there is nothing in ANY form of science which supports the notion "Goddidit with magic".
Yet it is widely acknowledged that the universe came about through quantum creationism and that quantum creationism is magical. http://everythingimportant.org/naturalism
The Dude

Macclesfield, UK

#4 Jan 9, 2014
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text> Yet it is widely acknowledged that the universe came about through quantum creationism and that quantum creationism is magical.
Keep lying, Shoob.

Level 2

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#5 Jan 9, 2014
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text> Yet it is widely acknowledged that the universe came about through quantum creationism and that quantum creationism is magical. http://everythingimportant.org/naturalism
" Biology is the study of complicated things that give the appearance of having been designed for a purpose"

Richard Dawkins,....The Blind Watchmaker

This statement is the very essence of denial

masquerading as science
Gillette

Fairfield, IA

#6 Jan 10, 2014
"The world is only 6000 years old or so, because it says so in the Bible!"

Now THAT'S denial.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#7 Jan 10, 2014
bohart wrote:
<quoted text>
" Biology is the study of complicated things that give the appearance of having been designed for a purpose"
Richard Dawkins,....The Blind Watchmaker
This statement is the very essence of denial
masquerading as science
Your uneducated opinion is noted.

Bo, you don't care about science. All you're interested in is Godmagic. And that's fine if you wanna say that God created the universe, etc. Lots of people do. Big whoop. But here's two things which are HIGHLY unlikely to change:

1 - This is your religious opinion, and it has NOTHING to do with science.

2 - It has nothing to do with evolution either, something which remains a scientific fact.

So if you wanna keep whining about atheists then go take it up with the atheism forum. This is the evolution forum, and evolution is a done deal whether there's a God or not. The theological/philosophical debate over whether or not such an entity exists has NO bearing at all whatsoever on the validity of science.

Level 2

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#9 Jan 10, 2014
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Your uneducated opinion is noted.
Bo, you don't care about science. All you're interested in is Godmagic. And that's fine if you wanna say that God created the universe, etc. Lots of people do. Big whoop. But here's two things which are HIGHLY unlikely to change:
1 - This is your religious opinion, and it has NOTHING to do with science.
2 - It has nothing to do with evolution either, something which remains a scientific fact.
So if you wanna keep whining about atheists then go take it up with the atheism forum. This is the evolution forum, and evolution is a done deal whether there's a God or not. The theological/philosophical debate over whether or not such an entity exists has NO bearing at all whatsoever on the validity of science.
Yak,yak,yak,yak.

Your idiocy is evident, you certainly are a one trick pony.

remember what your high priest said,

complicated things only give the appearance of having been designed!

HA,HA,HA.....what a fool

“Help religion science wander”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

into the night.

#10 Jan 10, 2014
bohart wrote:
<quoted text>
Yak,yak,yak,yak.
Your idiocy is evident, you certainly are a one trick pony.
remember what your high priest said,
complicated things only give the appearance of having been designed!
HA,HA,HA.....what a fool
So that profile of JFK on Maui, Hawaii was put there by divine intervention? Or a potato that looks like Abraham Lincoln?

Level 2

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#11 Jan 10, 2014
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>So that profile of JFK on Maui, Hawaii was put there by divine intervention? Or a potato that looks like Abraham Lincoln?
My previous post applies to you too .

“Help religion science wander”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

into the night.

#12 Jan 10, 2014
bohart wrote:
<quoted text>
My previous post applies to you too .
It is an honor to be included with The Dude. The Dude abides.

“Ask Randy From Ballwin”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

He Is A Sock Know It All

#13 Jan 10, 2014
bohart wrote:
Information theory destroys the astronomical luck theory
Luck and lies is all they have. Don't crush their little thoughts.
The Dude

Macclesfield, UK

#14 Jan 11, 2014
bohart wrote:
<quoted text>
Yak,yak,yak,yak.
Your idiocy is evident
Ad hom.
bohart wrote:
you certainly are a one trick pony.
If that's the case then all you're doing here is pointing out that it only takes one trick to defeat you. You are THAT easy.
bohart wrote:
remember what your high priest said,
complicated things only give the appearance of having been designed!
1 - Dawkins isn't my high priest. He is only one evolutionary biologist among many.

2 - I couldn't care less about atheism. So conflating me with an atheist Dawkins fanboy is uh, rather stupid.
bohart wrote:
HA,HA,HA.....what a fool
Yes, that is your opinion. And this opinion is based solely on the premise that my opinion of theism differs from yours.

That's all.

Either way I am still correct - evolution is a fact. Theism is an opinion. You hate science. That's all that's relevant here.
The Dude

Macclesfield, UK

#15 Jan 11, 2014
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>It is an honor to be included with The Dude. The Dude abides.
Cheers!

(raises virtual glass)
The Dude

Macclesfield, UK

#16 Jan 11, 2014
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
Luck and lies is all they have. Don't crush their little thoughts.
Repro, why are you, a known liar accusing other people of lying?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 10 min Dogen 204,905
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 2 hr replaytime 18,534
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 6 hr Into The Night 43,197
Questions about first life 7 hr FallenGeologist 1
can anyone explain to me why humans are the onl... (Mar '08) 8 hr It aint necessari... 914
News It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09) 18 hr Chimney1 151,481
Sun could not have formed as thought Thu U think Im wrong 19
More from around the web