Aliens and evolution

[Aura Mytha]

nanoanomaly wrote:

<quoted text>That's not how this works. You made a claim and I proved that you were wrong. Period.
You don't get to make up the rules as you go along.
Be gracious and say, "ok, anomaly, you were right."

You proved (claimed) a certain type rock can float. I agreed with though also said you could not produce one from your environment.
That means it is virtually possible but you cannot demonstrate it.

I don't make any rules but , my dear
I will enforce them.

[Aura Mytha]

Nuggin wrote:

<quoted text>
According to your statement, that hypothesis has 100% certainty until tested 100% of the time.
That's 100% confidence.
It's _proven_.
If I do no further testing, then you are forever retarded.
You standard makes you retarded.
Interestingly, taking a different tactic to evaluate your performance here we'd come to the same conclusion.
However the fact that multiple methodologies return the same correct answer does not mean that each is as valid.
In this case, you just lucked into revealing you are retarded, as opposed to displaying you retardation over the course of hundreds of posts.
<quoted text>
Would that be the question you incorrectly answered about the dictionary?
Or the question you incorrectly answered about the nature of science?
Or the question you incorrectly answered about weight vs density?
Or the question you incorrectly answered about...
Beginning to see the point?
You clearly haven't understood ANY of the questions.
Retardation "proven" 100% by stating a hypothesis that you are retarded.
Then re-"proven" by demonstrating it conclusively with your inability to formulate thoughts.
Seriously. You are _REALLY_ bad at this.

Nope try again nuglet.. The glass s half full or is it half empty?

[Aura Mytha]

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

[KittenKoder]

Nuggin wrote:

<quoted text>
You don't believe that science is capable of disproving things?
Are you completely unaware of experimentation as a concept?
Honestly, you have the scientific knowledge of a 4 year old.
I'm starting to really worry about whoever it is you have using the computer for you, because your level of understanding clearly precludes the ability to use the computer yourself.
Need an example: Fine.
Hypothesis:
An ordinary kitchen glass is unbreakable under all conditions.
Experiment:
Hit that glass with a hammer.
Result:
The glass breaks.
The hypothesis is DISPROVEN.

Nope, still not how it works.

[Aura Mytha]

nanoanomaly wrote:

<quoted text>That's not how this works. You made a claim and I proved that you were wrong. Period.
You don't get to make up the rules as you go along.
Be gracious and say, "ok, anomaly, you were right."

Sometimes.... you are AND, I worship you then as A Goddess.
Cept I resist as default response . Cause I can.

:)

[Aura Mytha]

Fancy that... resistance is far from futile!

[Nuggin]

Aura Mytha wrote:

<quoted text>
You proved (claimed) a certain type rock can float. I agreed with though also said you could not produce one from your environment.

Actually, YOU said that he couldn't produce one from his environment.

The rest of us recognize that his environment is irrelevant to your claim of 100% about everything thanks to your "scientific system" of "If Aura says so, then it's real 100% of the time."

That means it is virtually possible but you cannot demonstrate it.

You can not demonstrate that rocks in your enviroment sink.

You are limited to this website. Don't hold others to a higher standard than you hold yourself.

Or in this case - any standard.

[Nuggin]

Aura Mytha wrote:

<quoted text>
Nope try again nuglet.. The glass s half full or is it half empty?

Neither. The glass is. Period.

[nanoanomaly]

Aura Mytha wrote:

<quoted text> Sometimes.... you are AND, I worship you then as A Goddess.
Cept I resist as default response . Cause I can.
:)

If we were doing this face to face, I'd have you on your knees by now...and you'd like it.

[Aura Mytha]

Nuggin wrote:

<quoted text>
Actually, YOU said that he couldn't produce one from his environment.
The rest of us recognize that his environment is irrelevant to your claim of 100% about everything thanks to your "scientific system" of "If Aura says so, then it's real 100% of the time."
<quoted text>
You can not demonstrate that rocks in your enviroment sink.
You are limited to this website. Don't hold others to a higher standard than you hold yourself.
Or in this case - any standard.

I can demonstrate nuggin stole more chains than he could swim with.

[-Skeptic-]

Nuggin wrote:

<quoted text>
Actually, YOU said that he couldn't produce one from his environment.
The rest of us recognize that his environment is irrelevant to your claim of 100% about everything thanks to your "scientific system" of "If Aura says so, then it's real 100% of the time."
<quoted text>
You can not demonstrate that rocks in your enviroment sink.
You are limited to this website. Don't hold others to a higher standard than you hold yourself.
Or in this case - any standard.

Haha, the stupid f*ck troll who's lost so many arguments here is still talking out of his a$$.

[-Skeptic-]

Nuggin wrote:

<quoted text>
Hypothesis:
Nuggin claims that if you call something "God", it automatically becomes it.
Experiment:
Random person A calls an iPhone a god (because it appears to do magic):
The iPhone doesn't turn into or become a god.
The hypothesis is DISPROVEN.

Thanks Nuggin, now f*ck off back to your troll hole.

[The Dude]

Aura Mytha wrote:

<quoted text> Hypothesis is much like an innocent until proven guilty trial. It is proven till proven false , but it's proof status is with zero confidence without testing.

Wrong way round. A hypothesis is **innocent** of the claims made of it until demonstrated otherwise. E.g. evolution is "innocent" of being responsible for biological diversification unless demonstrated otherwise.

[The Dude]

-Skeptic- wrote:

<quoted text>
Haha, the stupid f*ck troll who's lost so many arguments here is still talking out of his a$$.

Ah, shaddap Skippy.

(eyeroll)

[The Dude]

Aura wrote:

<quoted text>
You proved (claimed) a certain type rock can float. I agreed with though also said you could not produce one from your environment.
That means it is virtually possible but you cannot demonstrate it.

I don't make any rules but , my dear
I will enforce them.

Nuggin wrote:

<quoted text>
Actually, YOU said that he couldn't produce one from his environment.
The rest of us recognize that his environment is irrelevant to your claim of 100% about everything thanks to your "scientific system" of "If Aura says so, then it's real 100% of the time."
<quoted text>
You can not demonstrate that rocks in your enviroment sink.
You are limited to this website. Don't hold others to a higher standard than you hold yourself.
Or in this case - any standard.

'Twas naughty. Tut tut Aura.

[The Dude]

nanoanomaly wrote:

<quoted text>If we were doing this face to face, I'd have you on your knees by now...and you'd like it.

I know **I** would...

(Dude kneels ready for kitteh worship)

[nanoanomaly]

The Dude wrote:

<quoted text>
I know **I** would...
(Dude kneels ready for kitteh worship)

Wait...

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

I haz mood muzak!

[Lil Ticked]

Aura Mytha wrote:

<quoted text>
You proved (claimed) a certain type rock can float. I agreed with though also said you could not produce one from your environment.
That means it is virtually possible but you cannot demonstrate it.
I don't make any rules but , my dear
I will enforce them.

Ever hear of feakin' google?

[Nuggin]

-Skeptic- wrote:

<quoted text>
Thanks Nuggin, now f*ck off back to your troll hole.

Skippy, this is what you have been reduced to. You pop out of your little hiding place, post a fake quote and then refute it. Throw a few swear words and run away again for a week.

You are a joke.

No, jokes serve a purpose. You're less than a joke. You're you.

[Nuggin]

KittenKoder wrote:

<quoted text>
Nope, still not how it works.

So, you are now taking Skippy's tactic of claiming to have knowledge about something but refusing to share it.

LOL. Pretty damn pathetic.

Please, oh master scientist, enlighten us all. Tell us how it is that science PROVES a hypothesis with 100% certainty 100% of the time.

This ought to be good for a laugh.