“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#189 Oct 2, 2012
Brian_G wrote:
I'm reading Ann's new book,'Mugged: Racial Demagoguery from the Seventies to Obama', it's fascinating. I like how she footnotes the facts.
Liberals have destroyed the black household by subsidizing single parent homes, increased crime with catch and release justice, promoted hoax race crimes while ignoring real race crimes.
Did you know Jim Jone's suicide cult victims were 70% black? His 'religion' was Marxism, not Christianity. They ignored his close ties to the Democratic party establishment and turned a blind eye to his insanity.
They are also responsible for the extinction of the dinosaurs. The B*stards!!!

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#190 Oct 2, 2012
Brian_G wrote:

Did you know Jim Jone's suicide cult victims were 70% black? His 'religion' was Marxism, not Christianity. They ignored his close ties to the Democratic party establishment and turned a blind eye to his insanity.
How in the hell does "Did you know Jim Jone's suicide cult victims were 70% black?" work into the equation?

What were the WHITE percentages of the UFO suicide cult (forgot the name of that whacko group).

Furthermore, Jim Jones WAS an extremist. As is the "Christian Dominionism" (or the "New Apostolic Reformation")folks. And THEY are aligned with the REPUBLICAN party, and MUCH more dangerous, IMHO.

http://www.thenation.com/article/166481/newts... #

“The strength of science is”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

founded in facts.

#192 Oct 2, 2012
Brian_G wrote:
I'm reading Ann's new book,'Mugged: Racial Demagoguery from the Seventies to Obama', it's fascinating. I like how she footnotes the facts.
Liberals have destroyed the black household by subsidizing single parent homes, increased crime with catch and release justice, promoted hoax race crimes while ignoring real race crimes.
Did you know Jim Jone's suicide cult victims were 70% black? His 'religion' was Marxism, not Christianity. They ignored his close ties to the Democratic party establishment and turned a blind eye to his insanity.
Did you know that Jim Jones was batshit insane just like Ann.

Anybody can play the game, "Guess how many (put politcal party here) have committed ghastly crimes against (whomever).

Ted Bundy for instance was a Republican that actually worked on a Republican campaign for Governor. Now, knowing that, I guess all Republicans must be serial killers and necrophiles.

I am just using your logic and Ann's.

“The strength of science is”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

founded in facts.

#193 Oct 2, 2012
Brian_G wrote:
She's like Jon Stewart, only smarter and conservative.
I like Joh Stewart too. While he may be smarter, I don't think he is conservative.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Level 10

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#194 Oct 2, 2012
Elohim wrote:
I thought this was supposed to be a non-fiction book? My mistake.
It's OK, unless you read it, you wouldn't know:

“This isn’t a story about black people—it’s a story about the Left’s agenda to patronize blacks and lie to everyone else.”

For decades, the Left has been putting on a play with themselves as heroes in an ongoing civil rights move­ment—which they were mostly absent from at the time. Long after pervasive racial discrimination ended, they kept pretending America was being run by the Klan and that liberals were black America’s only protectors.

It took the O. J. Simpson verdict—the race-based acquittal of a spectacularly guilty black celebrity as blacks across America erupted in cheers—to shut down the white guilt bank.

But now, fewer than two decades later, our “pos­tracial” president has returned us to the pre-OJ era of nonstop racial posturing. A half-black, half-white Democrat, not descended from American slaves, has brought racial unrest back with a whoop.

The Obama candidacy allowed liberals to engage in self-righteousness about race and get a hard-core Leftie in the White House at the same time. In 2008, we were told the only way for the nation to move past race was to elect him as president. And 53 percent of voters fell for it.

Now, Ann Coulter fearlessly explains the real his­tory of race relations in this country, including how white liberals twist that history to spring the guilty, accuse the innocent, and engender racial hatreds, all in order to win politically. You’ll learn, for instance, how
A U.S. congressman and a New York mayor con­spired to protect cop killers who ambushed four police officers in the Rev. Louis Farrakhan’s mosque.
The entire Democratic elite, up to the Carter White House, coddled a black cult in San Francisco as hun­dreds of the cult members marched to their deaths in Guyana.
New York City became a maelstrom of racial hatred, with black neighborhoods abandoned to crimi­nals who were ferociously defended by a press that assessed guilt on the basis of race.
Preposterous hoax hate crimes were always believed, never questioned. And when they turned out to be frauds the stories would simply disappear from the news.
Liberals quickly switched the focus of civil rights laws from the heirs of slavery and Jim Crow to white feminists, illegal immigrants, and gays.
Subway vigilante Bernhard Goetz was surprisingly popular in black neighborhoods, despite hysterical denunciations of him by the New York Times.
Liberals slander Republicans by endlessly repeating a bizarro-world history in which Democrats defended black America and Republicans appealed to segregationists. The truth has always been exactly the opposite.
Going where few authors would dare, Coulter explores the racial demagoguery that has mugged America since the early seventies. She shines the light of truth on cases ranging from Tawana Brawley, Lemrick Nelson, and Howard Beach, NY, to the LA riots and the Duke lacrosse scandal. And she shows how the 2012 Obama campaign is going to inspire the greatest racial guilt mongering of all time.
http://www.amazon.com/dp/1595230998
Elohim

Branford, CT

#195 Oct 2, 2012
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>It's OK, unless you read it, you wouldn't know:
“This isn’t a story about black people—it’s a story about the Left’s agenda to patronize blacks and lie to everyone else.”
For decades, the Left has been putting on a play with themselves as heroes in an ongoing civil rights move­ment—which they were mostly absent from at the time. Long after pervasive racial discrimination ended, they kept pretending America was being run by the Klan and that liberals were black America’s only protectors.
It took the O. J. Simpson verdict—the race-based acquittal of a spectacularly guilty black celebrity as blacks across America erupted in cheers—to shut down the white guilt bank.
But now, fewer than two decades later, our “pos­tracial” president has returned us to the pre-OJ era of nonstop racial posturing. A half-black, half-white Democrat, not descended from American slaves, has brought racial unrest back with a whoop.
The Obama candidacy allowed liberals to engage in self-righteousness about race and get a hard-core Leftie in the White House at the same time. In 2008, we were told the only way for the nation to move past race was to elect him as president. And 53 percent of voters fell for it.
Now, Ann Coulter fearlessly explains the real his­tory of race relations in this country, including how white liberals twist that history to spring the guilty, accuse the innocent, and engender racial hatreds, all in order to win politically. You’ll learn, for instance, how
A U.S. congressman and a New York mayor con­spired to protect cop killers who ambushed four police officers in the Rev. Louis Farrakhan’s mosque.
The entire Democratic elite, up to the Carter White House, coddled a black cult in San Francisco as hun­dreds of the cult members marched to their deaths in Guyana.
New York City became a maelstrom of racial hatred, with black neighborhoods abandoned to crimi­nals who were ferociously defended by a press that assessed guilt on the basis of race.
Preposterous hoax hate crimes were always believed, never questioned. And when they turned out to be frauds the stories would simply disappear from the news.
Liberals quickly switched the focus of civil rights laws from the heirs of slavery and Jim Crow to white feminists, illegal immigrants, and gays.
Subway vigilante Bernhard Goetz was surprisingly popular in black neighborhoods, despite hysterical denunciations of him by the New York Times.
Liberals slander Republicans by endlessly repeating a bizarro-world history in which Democrats defended black America and Republicans appealed to segregationists. The truth has always been exactly the opposite.
Going where few authors would dare, Coulter explores the racial demagoguery that has mugged America since the early seventies. She shines the light of truth on cases ranging from Tawana Brawley, Lemrick Nelson, and Howard Beach, NY, to the LA riots and the Duke lacrosse scandal. And she shows how the 2012 Obama campaign is going to inspire the greatest racial guilt mongering of all time.
http://www.amazon.com/dp/1595230998
Ann Coulter's name is on it, it is fiction. P.S. You neglect, like all rightwingers, to mention the fact that the southern democrats were 1) democrats beacause Lincon(R) freed the slaves, 2) defected en masse to the republicans after LBJ(D) signed The Civil Rights Act.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#197 Oct 2, 2012
_PrincessSusan_ wrote:
Good morning happy debaters. Dude, haven't seen you in ages. How are you?
:)
Still not registered?
Me good, hope you are too. Registered ages ago, but no need to sign in when I can happily type away like this.

It also recently had an amusing side-effect, one of Skeptic's buddies in the atheism forum now thinks I'm a closet creationist sockpuppet just because I disagreed with him. Which was ironic since they're supposed to be marketing themselves on rationality.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#198 Oct 2, 2012
Brian_G wrote:
I'm reading Ann's new book,'Mugged: Racial Demagoguery from the Seventies to Obama', it's fascinating. I like how she footnotes the facts.
Liberals have destroyed the black household by subsidizing single parent homes, increased crime with catch and release justice, promoted hoax race crimes while ignoring real race crimes.
Did you know Jim Jone's suicide cult victims were 70% black? His 'religion' was Marxism, not Christianity. They ignored his close ties to the Democratic party establishment and turned a blind eye to his insanity.
Teh Commies are coming, TEH COMMIES ARE COMING!!!

:-(

“The strength of science is”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

founded in facts.

#199 Oct 2, 2012
Elohim wrote:
<quoted text>Ann Coulter's name is on it, it is fiction. P.S. You neglect, like all rightwingers, to mention the fact that the southern democrats were 1) democrats beacause Lincon(R) freed the slaves, 2) defected en masse to the republicans after LBJ(D) signed The Civil Rights Act.
Neocons have become the master of "if you can't do it in fact, you can do it in revision."

“The strength of science is”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

founded in facts.

#200 Oct 2, 2012
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>It's OK, unless you read it, you wouldn't know:
“This isn’t a story about black people—it’s a story about the Left’s agenda to patronize blacks and lie to everyone else.”
For decades, the Left has been putting on a play with themselves as heroes in an ongoing civil rights move­ment—which they were mostly absent from at the time. Long after pervasive racial discrimination ended, they kept pretending America was being run by the Klan and that liberals were black America’s only protectors.
It took the O. J. Simpson verdict—the race-based acquittal of a spectacularly guilty black celebrity as blacks across America erupted in cheers—to shut down the white guilt bank.
But now, fewer than two decades later, our “pos­tracial” president has returned us to the pre-OJ era of nonstop racial posturing. A half-black, half-white Democrat, not descended from American slaves, has brought racial unrest back with a whoop.
The Obama candidacy allowed liberals to engage in self-righteousness about race and get a hard-core Leftie in the White House at the same time. In 2008, we were told the only way for the nation to move past race was to elect him as president. And 53 percent of voters fell for it.
Now, Ann Coulter fearlessly explains the real his­tory of race relations in this country, including how white liberals twist that history to spring the guilty, accuse the innocent, and engender racial hatreds, all in order to win politically. You’ll learn, for instance, how
A U.S. congressman and a New York mayor con­spired to protect cop killers who ambushed four police officers in the Rev. Louis Farrakhan’s mosque.
The entire Democratic elite, up to the Carter White House, coddled a black cult in San Francisco as hun­dreds of the cult members marched to their deaths in Guyana.
New York City became a maelstrom of racial hatred, with black neighborhoods abandoned to crimi­nals who were ferociously defended by a press that assessed guilt on the basis of race.
Preposterous hoax hate crimes were always believed, never questioned. And when they turned out to be frauds the stories would simply disappear from the news.
Liberals quickly switched the focus of civil rights laws from the heirs of slavery and Jim Crow to white feminists, illegal immigrants, and gays.
Subway vigilante Bernhard Goetz was surprisingly popular in black neighborhoods, despite hysterical denunciations of him by the New York Times.
Liberals slander Republicans by endlessly repeating a bizarro-world history in which Democrats defended black America and Republicans appealed to segregationists. The truth has always been exactly the opposite.
Going where few authors would dare, Coulter explores the racial demagoguery that has mugged America since the early seventies. She shines the light of truth on cases ranging from Tawana Brawley, Lemrick Nelson, and Howard Beach, NY, to the LA riots and the Duke lacrosse scandal. And she shows how the 2012 Obama campaign is going to inspire the greatest racial guilt mongering of all time.
http://www.amazon.com/dp/1595230998
If I had a dollar everytime one of you neocons called Obama a hard core lefty or the like, I would be a one percenter.

“I could be Susan's sock!”

Level 8

Since: Jun 12

Lady J's Lead Acolyte

#201 Oct 2, 2012
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Me good, hope you are too. Registered ages ago, but no need to sign in when I can happily type away like this.
It also recently had an amusing side-effect, one of Skeptic's buddies in the atheism forum now thinks I'm a closet creationist sockpuppet just because I disagreed with him. Which was ironic since they're supposed to be marketing themselves on rationality.
LOL!


See what happens when you don't log in. You are probably enjoying that greatly.

:)

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Level 10

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#204 Oct 3, 2012
Elohim wrote:
Ann Coulter's name is on it, it is fiction.
Do you have any evidence? Can you provide a quote?

.
Elohim wrote:
P.S. You neglect, like all rightwingers, to mention the fact that the southern democrats were 1) democrats beacause Lincon(R) freed the slaves,
You pick your party, it isn't forced on you.

.
Elohim wrote:
2) defected en masse to the republicans after LBJ(D) signed The Civil Rights Act.
The Republican party supported the Civil Rights Act 16% more than the Democrats in the Senate and 17% more in the House:

By party
The original House version:[16]

Democratic Party: 152–96 (61–39%)
Republican Party: 138–34 (80–20%)
Cloture in the Senate:[17]

Democratic Party: 44–23 (66–34%)
Republican Party: 27–6 (82–18%)
The Senate version:[16]

Democratic Party: 46–21 (69–31%)
Republican Party: 27–6 (82–18%)
The Senate version, voted on by the House:[16]

Democratic Party: 153–91 (63–37%)
Republican Party: 136–35 (80–20%)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act...
Elohim

Branford, CT

#206 Oct 3, 2012
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Do you have any evidence? Can you provide a quote?
.
<quoted text>You pick your party, it isn't forced on you.
.
<quoted text>The Republican party supported the Civil Rights Act 16% more than the Democrats in the Senate and 17% more in the House:
By party
The original House version:[16]
Democratic Party: 152–96 (61–39%)
Republican Party: 138–34 (80–20%)
Cloture in the Senate:[17]
Democratic Party: 44–23 (66–34%)
Republican Party: 27–6 (82–18%)
The Senate version:[16]
Democratic Party: 46–21 (69–31%)
Republican Party: 27–6 (82–18%)
The Senate version, voted on by the House:[16]
Democratic Party: 153–91 (63–37%)
Republican Party: 136–35 (80–20%)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act...
I see you've never heard of Nixon's Southern Strategy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strateg...

Level 7

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

#207 Oct 3, 2012
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>The Republican party supported the Civil Rights Act 16% more than the Democrats in the Senate and 17% more in the House:
You seem to think that this information effects the thinking of a Southern Racist.

You are seriously miscalculating the amount of thought that goes through their minds.

The President is a Dem, he passes civil rights. Therefore, Dems are for civil rights. Therefore, I'm switching to Republican.

It doesn't matter if more Republican members of the house voted one way or another. These guys don't know who THEIR OWN representative is, you think they are doing an overall assessment partywide?

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Level 10

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#208 Oct 3, 2012
Elohim wrote:
I see you've never heard of Nixon's Southern Strategy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strateg...
I don't believe defamation. You should look at the 'Talk' tab on Wikipedia, the score on the "Southern Strategy" page is low, a 'C'. The talk tab includes this interesting fact:

"Ah yes, great Southern Republican racists like Bull Conner, George Wallace, and Ross Barnett. Wait a minute- those are all Democrats! Indeed, it was only after they switched to the Republican party that formerly Democratic, formerly racist Southerners like Jesse Helms and Strom Thurmond backed away from or actively denounced racism. Yet the Senate Pro Temporae- Sa Democrat- was a KKK member, and the GOP is the racist party?"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Southern_st...
Elohim

Branford, CT

#209 Oct 3, 2012
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>I don't believe defamation. You should look at the 'Talk' tab on Wikipedia, the score on the "Southern Strategy" page is low, a 'C'. The talk tab includes this interesting fact:
"Ah yes, great Southern Republican racists like Bull Conner, George Wallace, and Ross Barnett. Wait a minute- those are all Democrats! Indeed, it was only after they switched to the Republican party that formerly Democratic, formerly racist Southerners like Jesse Helms and Strom Thurmond backed away from or actively denounced racism. Yet the Senate Pro Temporae- Sa Democrat- was a KKK member, and the GOP is the racist party?"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Southern_st...
Yea...right..... "You start out in 1954 by saying, "N*%ger, n*%ger, n*%ger." By 1968 you can't say "n*%ger" — that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me — because obviously sitting around saying, "We want to cut this," is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than "N*%ger, n*%ger." - Lee Atwater ,Republican King Maker

“The strength of science is”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

founded in facts.

#210 Oct 7, 2012
I thought I saw Ann today, but it turns out it was just the donkey at the petting zoo. Even after it was pointed out to me, I still wasn't sure, until I found out the donkey was friendly.

“There is no such thing”

Level 3

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

#211 Oct 7, 2012
DanFromSmithville wrote:
I thought I saw Ann today, but it turns out it was just the donkey at the petting zoo. Even after it was pointed out to me, I still wasn't sure, until I found out the donkey was friendly.
YOu must be confused. That was Sara Jessica Parker

“I could be Susan's sock!”

Level 8

Since: Jun 12

Lady J's Lead Acolyte

#212 Oct 8, 2012
Hey! I like Sarah Jessica Parker.

Level 7

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

#213 Oct 8, 2012
_PrincessSusan_ wrote:
Hey! I like Sarah Jessica Parker.
Me, too. I always bring her a sugar cube when I go for a ride

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 4 min thewordofme 132,277
How would creationists explain... 1 hr The Dude 308
Science News (Sep '13) 2 hr positronium 2,943
Genetic entropy 18 hr Discord 159
24 hour dental emergency (Nov '13) 19 hr Wally West 3
An atheistic view on evolution vs. a godly view... Thu The Dude 466
What you should know about Tuesday's vote on ev... (Feb '08) Wed IAMIOOWAN 516
More from around the web