Creation/Evolution Debate
Russell

Belconnen, Australia

#1647 Feb 3, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope, bored. I am going to bed in about a half an hour so if you post something tonight there may not be a response until tomorrow.
Just giving you fair warning not to take a lack of an answer as a victory.
Gosh, you're a sucker for punishment!

So, Mommy wont let you stay up late and play with your computer?

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#1648 Feb 3, 2013
I left of at page fpr as in 80 post from the amassed 1,954.
I'm really curious as to why i'm only getting it marked right now. And starting at page 4. Though i allready find it usefull

Apparently the average crea-fundie would only recognise a paper on anything to do with evolution, if it has the following words in it:
evolution and/or classification of species, language, race or primate families.

So the nazis wrote a lot about evolution, by that definition. And we had better ban language teachers also.

I looked up one of the societies and it's publications in 1996.
North American Paleontological Society publications 2006.
If i need anything on evolution, this is the club. A.o.

http://www.google.nl/search...

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#1649 Feb 3, 2013
Russel get your behind to page 4, so we can get on track.

Level 6

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

#1650 Feb 3, 2013
Russell wrote:
<quoted text>
Yawn....
Is it hot in the UAE?
In summer, high 40s.

Now? Perfect, high 20s.

And we had rain the day before yesterday. Happens about 3 times a year.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#1651 Feb 3, 2013
Russell wrote:
<quoted text>
Gosh, you're a sucker for punishment!
So, Mommy wont let you stay up late and play with your computer?
Me!? You are the one who's ass has been humped by everyone.

Hey loser, I don't live in Australia. It is very late and I do have to work tomorrow. I see that you have nothing. See you tomorrow.

Oh, before you post anything you might want to check it against TalkOrigins. Odds are your clocks have already been debunked there.

Unlike creatard sites like AIG and others they use real science to base their replies on. They even link the peer reviewed journals so that you can check for yourself if you don't believe them.

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#1652 Feb 3, 2013
Russel must have behaved really badly since about 300 posts from this thread have been deleted.

Russel, all you have to do is read page 1 to 4, add 5 for completion.

Some people are behind on the updates, some are ignorant but more and more creationists are just plain stupid and taking pride in that. imo
Russell

Belconnen, Australia

#1653 Feb 3, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
Me!? You are the one who's ass has been humped by everyone.
Hey loser, I don't live in Australia. It is very late and I do have to work tomorrow. I see that you have nothing. See you tomorrow.
Oh, before you post anything you might want to check it against TalkOrigins. Odds are your clocks have already been debunked there.
Unlike creatard sites like AIG and others they use real science to base their replies on. They even link the peer reviewed journals so that you can check for yourself if you don't believe them.
Oh I see
I have to go to a evolutionist web site, purported to use "science" to back up their claims and trawl through tons of boring rubbish that you are too lazy to present here for all the world to see?

Nonsense

Work has never stopped you raving on and on before
Russell

Belconnen, Australia

#1654 Feb 4, 2013
MAAT wrote:
Russel get your behind to page 4, so we can get on track.
Hey Bud
Have we met before?
What's on page 4
Seems like an eternity ago!
Firstly, thou shalt declare thy colours before making request of ...moi

Secondly
Page 4 better not be a bunch of rubbish

Thirdly, if you've been a "bad boy", how do you know I want to come out and play at all?

If you're a Christian bad boy, of course, all is forgiven and we're friends for life
If not......you better watch out
Russell

Belconnen, Australia

#1655 Feb 4, 2013
Chimney1 wrote:
<quoted text>
In summer, high 40s.
Now? Perfect, high 20s.
And we had rain the day before yesterday. Happens about 3 times a year.
Sounds nice
If I didn't know better
Expecting any gibli's anytime soon?

Been to the Burj?
Russell

Belconnen, Australia

#1656 Feb 4, 2013
MAAT wrote:
Russel must have behaved really badly since about 300 posts from this thread have been deleted.
Russel, all you have to do is read page 1 to 4, add 5 for completion.
Some people are behind on the updates, some are ignorant but more and more creationists are just plain stupid and taking pride in that. imo
OK, page 4 was trash

What else you got?

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#1657 Feb 4, 2013
Russell wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh I see
I have to go to a evolutionist web site, purported to use "science" to back up their claims and trawl through tons of boring rubbish that you are too lazy to present here for all the world to see?
Nonsense
Work has never stopped you raving on and on before
That is not what I said, idiot. I told you to go to a scientific website if you had a clock that you thought gave evidence for a young Earth. Odds are you could use a search function and your nonsense would instantly be debunked.

I was just trying to save you some embarrassment.

And it is already tomorrow for me. Bye for now.

Level 6

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

#1658 Feb 4, 2013
Russell wrote:
<quoted text>
Sounds nice
If I didn't know better
Expecting any gibli's anytime soon?
Been to the Burj?
By the sounds of it, recent events in Aus have given some of you a taste of it. Lived in Sydney and Melbourne, had a few scorchers while there.

Kuwait City is my personal record. 53. Ouch.

Yes, the Burj, the this, the that. Its pretty amazing for a pretend city.
Russell

Belconnen, Australia

#1659 Feb 4, 2013
Chimney1 wrote:
<quoted text>
By the sounds of it, recent events in Aus have given some of you a taste of it. Lived in Sydney and Melbourne, had a few scorchers while there.
Kuwait City is my personal record. 53. Ouch.
Yes, the Burj, the this, the that. Its pretty amazing for a pretend city.
Kuwait is pretty trash as well. Esp winter...ghastly
I thought Abu Dhabi was pleasant ...in a mind numbing way...

I think Oman has more promise...or had... depending on perspective and politics

But Doha is the ultimate non-destination
Went there for Aust vs whoever soccer ...and guess what?
Didn't get in despite having a valid ticket
Why?
Because the bureaucrats "gave away" seats to friends and family...so that thousands of legitimate ticket holders were stranded outside gates that unceremoniously shut in our collective faces just before the match began.

Who says world views don't matter, eh?

Level 6

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

#1660 Feb 4, 2013
Russell wrote:
<quoted text>
Kuwait is pretty trash as well. Esp winter...ghastly
I thought Abu Dhabi was pleasant ...in a mind numbing way...
I think Oman has more promise...or had... depending on perspective and politics
But Doha is the ultimate non-destination
Went there for Aust vs whoever soccer ...and guess what?
Didn't get in despite having a valid ticket
Why?
Because the bureaucrats "gave away" seats to friends and family...so that thousands of legitimate ticket holders were stranded outside gates that unceremoniously shut in our collective faces just before the match began.
Who says world views don't matter, eh?
There is little to recommend this region. Soon as I am sorted, I am off to Aus. Kiwi originally

“When you treat people as they ”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#1661 Feb 4, 2013
Russell wrote:
<quoted text>
Why
Hello!
...
Already all covered in this forum ages ago.
And you still don’t have any answers
The Dude

Macclesfield, UK

#1662 Feb 4, 2013
Russell wrote:
Still not convinced???
No, course not...!!
Smart arse responses, and the "meh, shrug, humbug" awaited.
Nothing new....
C-14 has been found in coal and diamonds....there should be none!
Radioisotope dating suffers from unprovable assumptions----fatally flawed techniques----yet evolutionists contend as fact what they CANNOT prove.
Abundant daughter isotopes are indicative of accelerated nuclear decay associated with Creation----expansion, stretching out, or acceleration of the Universe from an extremely hot, dense phase.
Evidences of accelerated nuclear decay in igneous rocks found worldwide are helium in zircon crystals, radiohalos and fission tracks, AND magnetic field reversals and decay.....
Young earth
Young creation...
Well actually, no.
6000 years is terribly old.
If that's the case that to accelerate nuclear decay at the levels you require would sterilize the universe. Of course none of this is relevant when your "scientific alternative" is invisible Jewmagic. But thanks once again for demonstrating you're not only rejecting biology but every field of science as a whole.

Science is irrelevant to you. And even better, if we pretend for a moment that all the sciences you have theological distaste for were as flawed as you so baselessly claim, since the alternative you propose to fix all the problems of YOUR position (invisible magic) then it would be just as EQUALLY valid to fix all the alleged problems of our position. You could never get any better than a stalemate. You can't win. Ever. Debate is pointless. You may as well go home.

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#1663 Feb 4, 2013
second that.

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#1664 Feb 4, 2013
MAAT wrote:
Russel must have behaved really badly since about 300 posts from this thread have been deleted.
Russel, all you have to do is read page 1 to 4, add 5 for completion.
Some people are behind on the updates, some are ignorant but more and more creationists are just plain stupid and taking pride in that. imo
Ah i see that you cannot follow simple instructions.
And then come up with some weird shite about getting to know people.
As if getting to know people equals following instructions and understanding information.

Hmm for creatards it probably is like that.
Only trust your in-group.
But then go all the way.

Not very rational.
I don't wan to get to know you.
I just want you to read.

I know i need a little private talk with the mod.
Russell

Adelaide, Australia

#1665 Feb 4, 2013
MAAT wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah i see that you cannot follow simple instructions.
And then come up with some weird shite about getting to know people.
As if getting to know people equals following instructions and understanding information.
Hmm for creatards it probably is like that.
Only trust your in-group.
But then go all the way.
Not very rational.
I don't wan to get to know you.
I just want you to read.
I know i need a little private talk with the mod.
You are quite scary, mate
Time to get a life??

And, no

Unequivocally

I do not want to "get to know you"

What you mean by "in-group" is probably "holy huddle" that Christians are well known for liking

Do you feel excluded ?

Wanna complain to the mod?

This is a DEBATE!

Provide your arguments, if you dare
Otherwise, why not just chat to Christine?

Her favourite book is DSM IV
Russell

Adelaide, Australia

#1666 Feb 4, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
If that's the case that to accelerate nuclear decay at the levels you require would sterilize the universe.
It was at the time of Creation
The Dude wrote:
Of course none of this is relevant when your "scientific alternative" is invisible Jewmagic. But thanks once again for demonstrating you're not only rejecting biology but every field of science as a whole.
Now that's plain silly..
Why would I reject science that I love and and thoroughly enjoy?
Biology....hmmm...well that pretty nice too...I guess

BUT EVOLUTION JUST DON'T CUT IT!!!!!
It ain't science, Bud
The Dude wrote:
Science is irrelevant to you. And even better, if we pretend for a moment that all the sciences you have theological distaste for were as flawed as you so baselessly claim, since the alternative you propose to fix all the problems of YOUR position (invisible magic) then it would be just as EQUALLY valid to fix all the alleged problems of our position. You could never get any better than a stalemate. You can't win. Ever. Debate is pointless. You may as well go home.
Wrong again...
Sigh...

OK

Where's the MAC evolution you promised, Mr Immunology?

Science and I are tight
I got no issues with science

Evolution is a ridiculous fraud and an insult to intelligence

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 41 min Big girl 20,312
News It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09) 1 hr Dogen 152,280
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 2 hr A_Visitor 210,021
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 2 hr SoE 45,560
Science News (Sep '13) 3 hr Maverick 808 3,623
America evolving into lockdown on purpose Sep 25 Dogen 68
New law to further hatred towards police Sep 24 One way or another 4
More from around the web