Creation/Evolution Debate

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#1606 Dec 7, 2012
Subduction Zone wrote:
Poor Russell, he has nothing. I almost feel sorry for the boob.
Almost.
Too bad he projects so much. The poor fool now thinks I am the liar.
Once again Russell, you need to get a shorter river to swim in.
You can lie all that you want, you aren't even fooling yourself anymore and that is really pathetic.
Pathetic. Good word. Fits him precisely.

Since: Sep 12

Arlington, TX

#1607 Dec 7, 2012
ssssss wrote:
black slaves only escaped slavery because of religion true or false???
Black slaves got their freedom because "honest" Abe needed a reason for war. He was more interested in the preservation of the union than freeing slaves.

Since: Sep 12

Arlington, TX

#1608 Dec 7, 2012
ssssss wrote:
because they went to church???

Does it matter???

Nawm i guess you can have atheist church..
Atheist in the religion of Darwinism at the church of evolution where you all praise the goo?

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#1609 Dec 7, 2012
Bat Foy wrote:
<quoted text>
Black slaves got their freedom because "honest" Abe needed a reason for war. He was more interested in the preservation of the union than freeing slaves.
Bat Foy, who "taught" you history?

All I can say is "NO".
Russell

Belconnen, Australia

#1610 Dec 7, 2012
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
I am not an academic and therefore am not funded for such work, I learn of my own volition because I want to.
That explains EVERYTHING!
Russell

Belconnen, Australia

#1611 Dec 7, 2012
Where is Shrugosaurus?

Last dumbo standing....

But not for long...

Shrugosaurus....oh, Shrugosaurus...?????
Where are you?

“When you treat people as they ”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#1612 Dec 8, 2012
Russell wrote:
<quoted text>
That explains EVERYTHING!
Yes it explains your LIES and that you make BS up because you have no actual facts to offer, well done for pointing that out
The Dude

Macclesfield, UK

#1613 Dec 11, 2012
Russell wrote:
So, since he's a creationist he is a lying scumbag?
Um.... well yeah.(shrug)
Russell wrote:
Where is Shrugosaurus?
Last dumbo standing....
But not for long...
Shrugosaurus....oh, Shrugosaurus...?????
Where are you?
Still waiting for you back on page 1. You've still running after 7 weeks even though you were on a false start.

“I am an ALIEN!!!”

Level 6

Since: Dec 06

KREUZBERG...

#1614 Dec 13, 2012
Seems we can really just copy and past e alot from the other side uh site that is.... LOL

To be intentionally ignorant is really way aok...

Seems some really don't know all that much wanting to know more????

“I am an ALIEN!!!”

Level 6

Since: Dec 06

KREUZBERG...

#1615 Dec 13, 2012
I take Regulation for 500 and pass on the ed u cation until the percentage has Risen and the Politics Economical Science I mean Politics has a bit more than one tiny percent in lead ...

Most preachings are too set in their way little evolving in some areas I mean how much can God do, change?

Like a gun in someone's hand pull it or don't God - is like a gun in someone's hand he's in their head mostly...
The East Coast once again the people they are pulling together and this time there's no one but Weather and it's conditions and getting together and building it up again...

Do you think that is just a Godly duty?

“I am an ALIEN!!!”

Level 6

Since: Dec 06

KREUZBERG...

#1616 Dec 13, 2012
Night

Thanks for the invite :)
Russell

Ainslie, Australia

#1617 Dec 13, 2012
Tinka wrote:
I take Regulation for 500 and pass on the ed u cation until the percentage has Risen and the Politics Economical Science I mean Politics has a bit more than one tiny percent in lead ...
Most preachings are too set in their way little evolving in some areas I mean how much can God do, change?
Like a gun in someone's hand pull it or don't God - is like a gun in someone's hand he's in their head mostly...
The East Coast once again the people they are pulling together and this time there's no one but Weather and it's conditions and getting together and building it up again...
Do you think that is just a Godly duty?
Hey!
Who said you could come here?

You have to be at least 12 yrs old, like Subduction Zone, to be allowed on this forum

Level 1

Since: Jul 07

Binghamton, NY

#1618 Feb 3, 2013
Russell wrote:
I came across a website claiming loads of evidence for evolution. Here is the quote I sent:
Dr Colin Patterson, Senior Paleontologist at the British Museum of
Natural History wrote a book on evolution. He was asked why he did notinclude any information about intermediate forms. He responded:
I fully agree with your comments on the lack of direct illustration of evolutionary transitions in my book. If I knew of any,fossil or living, I would certainly have included them.… Gould [Stephen J. Gould—the now deceased professor of paleontology from Harvard University] and the American Museum people are hard to contradict when they say there are no transitional fossils.… You say that I should at least “show a photo of the fossil from which each type of organism was derived.” I will lay it on the line—there is not one such fossil for which one could make a watertight argument.In addition to the above observation by Patterson, he even asked several people and groups of people if they knew anything about evolution that was true. He says:
… so for the last few weeks I’ve tried putting a simple question
to various people and groups of people.[The] question is: Can you tell me anything you know about evolution, any one thing, any one thing that is true? I tried that question on the geology staff at the Field Museum of Natural History and the only answer I got was silence. I tried it on the members of the Evolutionary Morphology Seminar in the University of Chicago, a very prestigious body of evolutionists, and all I got there was silence for a long time and eventually one person said,“I do know one thing – it ought not to be taught in high school.
end quote
It is obvious evolution is a faith, not science. Anyone disagree??
Here is a link to a listing of transitional fossils. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_transiti...

Name one thing? The ancestor of the horse, the Eohippus, had 5 toes on each foot. Through time and evolution the modern hose has a hoof on each foot.

Now it's your turn. Please show me where the Platypus fits into creation.
Russell

Belconnen, Australia

#1619 Feb 3, 2013
digitalartist wrote:
<quoted text>
Here is a link to a listing of transitional fossils. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_transiti...
Name one thing? The ancestor of the horse, the Eohippus, had 5 toes on each foot. Through time and evolution the modern hose has a hoof on each foot.
Now it's your turn. Please show me where the Platypus fits into creation.
Why
Hello!
Where does platypus fit in with Creation?
That's interesting..........read 'silly'

On which Creation Day were the water dwelling creatures made?

And, by the way, horse 'evolution' has been completely discredited a very long time ago.

http://creation.com/what-about-horse-toe-evol...

http://creation.com/horse-evolution

http://creation.com/the-non-evolution-of-the-...

Ad nauseum.......

Already all covered in this forum ages ago.
The Dude

Macclesfield, UK

#1620 Feb 3, 2013
digitalartist wrote:
<quoted text>
Here is a link to a listing of transitional fossils. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_transiti...
Name one thing? The ancestor of the horse, the Eohippus, had 5 toes on each foot. Through time and evolution the modern hose has a hoof on each foot.
Now it's your turn. Please show me where the Platypus fits into creation.
Way to go, you woke up the daft-as-a-brush liar for Jesus.
Russell wrote:
<quoted text>
Why
Hello!
Where does platypus fit in with Creation?
That's interesting..........read 'silly'
On which Creation Day were the water dwelling creatures made?
And, by the way, horse 'evolution' has been completely discredited a very long time ago.
http://creation.com/what-about-horse-toe-evol...
http://creation.com/horse-evolution
http://creation.com/the-non-evolution-of-the-...
Ad nauseum.......
Already all covered in this forum ages ago.
Yup, and debunked in this forum ages ago, too. By themselves even.
Stupid liars for Jesus website wrote:
The scientific aspects of creation are important, but are SECONDARY in importance to the proclamation of the Gospel of Jesus Christ as Sovereign, Creator, Redeemer and Judge.
(emphasis mine)

Poor old Russ. Still can't get past page 1.
Russell

Belconnen, Australia

#1621 Feb 3, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Way to go, you woke up the daft-as-a-brush liar for Jesus.
<quoted text>
Yup, and debunked in this forum ages ago, too. By themselves even.
<quoted text> (emphasis mine)
Poor old Russ. Still can't get past page 1.
I see you're still here...
"Meh, shrug, hum bug"

Still going on about Page 1?

Whatchoo got there?

Usual debunkable nonsense?

C'mon

It's a new year

How about some dazzling evo-science instead of dead beat redundant nonsense
The Dude

Macclesfield, UK

#1622 Feb 3, 2013
Russell wrote:
<quoted text>
I see you're still here...
"Meh, shrug, hum bug"
Still going on about Page 1?
Whatchoo got there?
Usual debunkable nonsense?
C'mon
It's a new year
How about some dazzling evo-science instead of dead beat redundant nonsense
It's only debunkable if and when you can debunk it. You never have.

Let us know when you finally arrive at the starting line, Russ.
Russell

Belconnen, Australia

#1623 Feb 3, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
It's only debunkable if and when you can debunk it. You never have.
Let us know when you finally arrive at the starting line, Russ.
Evolution has never been observed within living populations, there are no transitional types, and there are no biological processes for evolution.

The bottom line is that evolution has never been observed or proven by empirical science.

Evolution is simply assumed to be true.

Evolution does not even meet the definition of a theory.

A theory is an explanation of a set of related observations or event based on proven hypotheses and verified multiple times by independent researchers.

In fact, evolution is not even worthy of the term hypothesis, which is an educated guess, based upon observation, but has not yet been proven.

Your compatriot Anthony Flew, converted to Christianity from atheism, "At the most recent debate in 2004, at New York University, he declared that he ‘now accepted the existence of a God’(p. 74). In that debate, he said that he believed that the origin of life points to a creative Intelligence,

‘almost entirely because of the DNA investigations. What I think the DNA material has done is that it has shown, by the almost unbelievable complexity of the arrangements which are needed to produce (life), that intelligence must have been involved in getting these extraordinarily diverse elements to work together. It’s the enormous complexity of the number of elements and the enormous subtlety of the ways they work together. The meeting of these two parts at the right time by chance is simply minute. It is all a matter of the enormous complexity by which the results were achieved, which looked to me like the work of intelligence’(p. 75). "

http://creation.com/review-there-is-a-god-by-...

Richard (Rick) Errett Smalley (1943–2005), M.A., Ph.D.(Princeton), was the Hackerman Professor of Chemistry, Physics, and Astronomy at Rice University.1 He was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1996 for his discovery of (and his research on) a totally new allotrope (form) of carbon. This comprised unique soccerball-shaped molecules he named buckminsterfullerenes, nicknamed buckyballs,
was furious by the shoddy science under-girding evolution. His wife (a biologist, who had to come to terms with the same issues) wrote:

“I remember him pacing the bedroom floor in anger saying evolution was bad science. Rick hated bad science worse than anything else. He said if he conducted his research the way that they did, he would never be respected in the scientific community.”

He also claimed that Darwinian evolution had been given its death blow due to the advance of genetics and cell-biology, and that it was now clear that biological evolution could not have occurred.

Spike Psarris has a B.Sc. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Massachusetts and has done graduate work in Physics. He was formerly an engineer in the United States military space program. He entered the job as an atheist and evolutionist. He ended up becoming a creationist first and then a Christian.

Science supports Creation.
Not evolution.
The Dude

Macclesfield, UK

#1624 Feb 3, 2013
Russell wrote:
Evolution has never been observed within living populations, there are no transitional types, and there are no biological processes for evolution.
The bottom line is that evolution has never been observed or proven by empirical science.
Evolution is simply assumed to be true.
Evolution does not even meet the definition of a theory.
A theory is an explanation of a set of related observations or event based on proven hypotheses and verified multiple times by independent researchers.
In fact, evolution is not even worthy of the term hypothesis, which is an educated guess, based upon observation, but has not yet been proven.
Evolution has been demonstrated, as shown on page 1.
Russell wrote:
Your compatriot Anthony Flew, converted to Christianity from atheism
Who? His theological opinions are irrelevant. Theology is irrelevant.
Russell wrote:
it was now clear that biological evolution could not have occurred.
So they claim.
Russell wrote:
Science supports Creation.
Not evolution.
How does science support invisible magic Jewish wizardry?

Or to put it another way, why are you lying and pretending that evidence is relevant to Goddidit with magic?
Russell

Belconnen, Australia

#1628 Feb 3, 2013
Still not convinced???

No, course not...!!

Smart arse responses, and the "meh, shrug, humbug" awaited.

Nothing new....

C-14 has been found in coal and diamonds....there should be none!

Radioisotope dating suffers from unprovable assumptions----fatally flawed techniques----yet evolutionists contend as fact what they CANNOT prove.

Abundant daughter isotopes are indicative of accelerated nuclear decay associated with Creation----expansion, stretching out, or acceleration of the Universe from an extremely hot, dense phase.

Evidences of accelerated nuclear decay in igneous rocks found worldwide are helium in zircon crystals, radiohalos and fission tracks, AND magnetic field reversals and decay.....

Young earth
Young creation...

Well actually, no.
6000 years is terribly old.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 1 min Out of the Night 70,426
Do alleged ERVs confirm common descent? 16 min Subduction Zone 73
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 37 min Eagle 12 30,417
News Nonsense of a high order: The confused world of... 58 min Out of the Night 3,823
G-d versus Evolution? 1 hr Al Caplan 33
The Subduction Zone class on Evidence. (Jun '13) 1 hr Out of the Night 78
How can we prove God exists, or does not? (May '15) 10 hr Paul Scott 228
More from around the web