Creation/Evolution Debate

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#1562 Dec 5, 2012
Russell wrote:
<quoted text>
DO YOU ADMIT YOU WERE wrong?
No, I said it was highly unlikely. And that his school would take away his PhD if they could. It seems he did the "honorable" thing and left your country and is now plaguing ours.

He is still one hundred percent wrong. A first year chemistry major could rip his argument to shreds. It has been 30 years since I took a Pchem class and I did have decently. If I had had any organic chemistry I could have totally owned his sorry ass.
Russell

Adelaide, Australia

#1563 Dec 5, 2012
Subduction Zone wrote:
Oh crap, he is another example of Australia dumping its crap on the U.S.. He emigrated here.
Second the idiot does not believe in the Big Bang, even though we can see stars moving exactly according to that theory, and the uniform background radiation confirms it.
Third, he acts as if reactions are random. As a chemist he knows that that is nowhere near the truth.
Fourth, he is trying to compare modern day cells to ancient early cell. The number of enzymes necessary would be nowhere near his proposed figure.
It is very late so I will cut it short. Here is a video to counter your video. They got it right, they know they are talking about abiogenesis:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =U6QYDdgP9egXX
And a website:
http://exploringorigins.org/
Try to keep your arguments straight. If you want to argue against abiogenesis say so from the start, if you want to argue evolution the same rule applies.
Nimrod, and biatch.
Do you admit you were wrong?

C'mon Marshmallow Terminator

Everyone's watching....

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#1564 Dec 5, 2012
So, if you watched my video you will see that the nonsense your "PhD" spouted has been debunked.

Any questions?

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#1565 Dec 5, 2012
Russell wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you admit you were wrong?
C'mon Marshmallow Terminator
Everyone's watching....
Mr. Squishy Feet, look at my original post and tell me how I am wrong?

By the way, your guy is full of crap. Do you admit that he was wrong?
Russell

Adelaide, Australia

#1566 Dec 5, 2012
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
Mr. Squishy Feet, look at my original post and tell me how I am wrong?
By the way, your guy is full of crap. Do you admit that he was wrong?
Good heavens

You have proven to be a bigger fool than I thought

Here is a very clear thread of posts of YOUR comments claiming that a PhD physical chemist COULD NOT have made the statements I claimed he did

You ridiculed me and said that I needed an education

I have provided AIR TIGHT EVIDENCE that a PhD physical chemist, chess champion, published author, DID indeed in a public forum say what I claimed he said

And, you deny it....
Russell

Adelaide, Australia

#1567 Dec 5, 2012
Subduction Zone wrote:
So, if you watched my video you will see that the nonsense your "PhD" spouted has been debunked.
Any questions?
I am not watching any of your videos, Bud
Or anything

I have proven unequivocally that you are a liar

Nothing you say any longer counts
Because you lie

The evidence is right here for all the world to see

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#1568 Dec 5, 2012
Russell wrote:
<quoted text>
Good heavens
You have proven to be a bigger fool than I thought
Here is a very clear thread of posts of YOUR comments claiming that a PhD physical chemist COULD NOT have made the statements I claimed he did
You ridiculed me and said that I needed an education
I have provided AIR TIGHT EVIDENCE that a PhD physical chemist, chess champion, published author, DID indeed in a public forum say what I claimed he said
And, you deny it....
Once again Mr. Squishy Feet. Read my post that started all of this. I wrote that it was highly unlikely. I didn't say that it was impossible.

Yes, congratulations, you have shown that a chess genius with a chemistry degree can make a complete ass of himself. I would love to see the reaction of his fellow chemists when they saw that clip. The clapping from all of the facepalms would have been deafening.

And yes, I admitted that you found your idiot. Did you watch the video that I posted and did you realize how it totally shreds your piece of crap?

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#1569 Dec 5, 2012
Russell wrote:
<quoted text>
I am not watching any of your videos, Bud
Or anything
I have proven unequivocally that you are a liar
Nothing you say any longer counts
Because you lie
The evidence is right here for all the world to see
Okay good, then I win by default.

Thank you Mr. Squishy feet and biatch!

And no, you have not proven that I am a liar. Go back and read my post. AGAIN!! Find a lie. You won't be able to.

Russell, the terminal liar and loser.
Russell

Adelaide, Australia

#1570 Dec 5, 2012
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>

And yes, I admitted that you found your idiot. Did you watch the video that I posted and did you realize how it totally shreds your piece of crap?
That's not what I am asking

Do you admit you were wrong?

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#1571 Dec 5, 2012
By the way Russell, other people can read my first post and they will see that I did not lie. You might not have been able to understand it, there were a few words with more than one syllable in it. I am not afraid of people reading my first post. Why are you afraid to watch a video that will show you what an ass your chemist is?

And even though you are a total liar and general ass, I am still willing to help you learn.

See, I win either way. If you stay an idiot you will continue to lose these debates. If you learn enough you will eventually accept evolution or you will lie to yourself so much even you won't be able to stand yourself.
Russell

Adelaide, Australia

#1572 Dec 5, 2012
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay good, then I win by default.
Thank you Mr. Squishy feet and biatch!
And no, you have not proven that I am a liar. Go back and read my post. AGAIN!! Find a lie. You won't be able to.
Russell, the terminal liar and loser.
How you struggle with simply admitting you are wrong....

Ad hominem attacks....impugning a perfectly excellent scientist and person...

Wriggling like a stuck pig
Ranting
Carrying on....

Wont accept that YOU WERE WRONG....

You are pathetic

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#1573 Dec 5, 2012
Russell wrote:
<quoted text>
That's not what I am asking
Do you admit you were wrong?
In what way? You tried to change what I claimed. Go back to my first post and be more specific. And by trying to change what I said you were, once again, lying.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#1574 Dec 5, 2012
Russell wrote:
<quoted text>
How you struggle with simply admitting you are wrong....
Ad hominem attacks....impugning a perfectly excellent scientist and person...
Wriggling like a stuck pig
Ranting
Carrying on....
Wont accept that YOU WERE WRONG....
You are pathetic
Once again tard, how was I wrong?

And no, he is not an excellent scientist. He is a lying scumbag and even he knows it. He is ruined for any real life in his chosen profession since he has shown that he cannot be trusted to do scientific work. That is why he joined that creationist cult.
Russell

Canberra, Australia

#1575 Dec 6, 2012
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
In what way? You tried to change what I claimed. Go back to my first post and be more specific. And by trying to change what I said you were, once again, lying.
Here's my caricature of you again
Shockingly true to life

Subduction Zone's Wife:

Darlin'
Dinner is ready

Subduction Zone:
No
Dinner isn't ready
You said dinner was ready...
But it clearly IS NOT
There're no pickles on the table
How can dinner be ready if there're no pickles on the table?

Subduction Zone's wife,(in a quiet voice):
We're having meatloaf...
You don't need pickles...

Subduction Zone:
But you clearly said 'dinner is ready"
If you go back to what you said earlier...
You said that
You did not say anything about meatloaf
So you're changing what you said...
You can't say that dinner is ready
And then say that dinner is meatloaf
YOU'RE WRONG
YOU IDIOT
GET AN EDUCATION!!!!

Subduction Zone's wife (whilst wielding a rather heavy frying pan):
CLUNK!!!!
Lights out, Subduction Zone.....
You'll never learn....will you?
Russell

Canberra, Australia

#1576 Dec 6, 2012
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
No, I said it was highly unlikely. And that his school would take away his PhD if they could. It seems he did the "honorable" thing and left your country and is now plaguing ours.
He is still one hundred percent wrong. A first year chemistry major could rip his argument to shreds.
Here's the admission of ignorance:
Subduction Zone wrote:
It has been 30 years since I took a Pchem class and I did have decently.
And note further admission of ignorance:
Subduction Zone wrote:
If I had had any organic chemistry I could have totally owned his sorry ass.
Self admitted IGNORANCE
Russell

Canberra, Australia

#1577 Dec 6, 2012
Just as in my caricature:
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
Once again Mr. Squishy Feet. Read my post that started all of this. I wrote that it was highly unlikely. I didn't say that it was impossible.
Now trying to wriggle out of admitting he has been caught out:
Subduction Zone wrote:
Yes, congratulations, you have shown that a chess genius with a chemistry degree can make a complete ass of himself. I would love to see the reaction of his fellow chemists when they saw that clip. The clapping from all of the facepalms would have been deafening.
Here's the lie
Subduction Zone wrote:
And yes, I admitted that you found your idiot. Did you watch the video that I posted and did you realize how it totally shreds your piece of crap?
Definite equivocation......lying
Russell

Canberra, Australia

#1578 Dec 6, 2012
Here are the original posts, AGAIN:
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>This is hwy you need an education. That is either one of the funniest posts ever or saddest. All you have illustrated here is that you know nothing of biology, chemistry, or statistics. Since we do observe those chemicals in nature we know without even checking your horrendously poor math that you got it wrong.
Full of contradictions
Later on Subduction Zone laments that Dr Sarfati was commenting on "ancient cells" by reference to modern cells

And here, he says, Since we do observe those chemicals in nature"

Referring of course to modern chemicals...

Here is the "I seriously doubt it"
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
I seriously doubt it. If a PhD pchem said something that stupid publicly his school would probably rescind his diploma if they could.
Someone who has taken pchem would know that chemical reactions are not random which would throw out his whole "proof" instantly.
I seriously doubt it....to most normal people means, "I seriously doubt it"

But to Subduction Zone, from what he has been trying to convince me ever since, he means....well, anything....from "I seriously believe it".....
to...."Yes, may be what you're saying is absolutely true"....or "you are quite possibly correct..."
Or..."No way are you right"

Because, he argued, such comments would be cause for concern for any University and may lead to the rescinding of Dr Sarfati's PhD....

THEREFORE, Subduction Zone, was QUITE clear that no PhD Physical Chemist would make the statement that I had claimed he did
Russell

Canberra, Australia

#1579 Dec 6, 2012
When offered a chance to take back what he said:
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
I stand by my original statement.
Therefore he is held accountable for his statement
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>Actually I said his college would take his degree away from him if they could.
Here is where he repeats his assertion that NO PhD Physical Chemist would say what I claimed had been said by a PhD Physical Chemist:

Subduction Zone wrote:
I did say that no real Pchem PhD holder would say it. Let's see what you have.
After all this
When I demonstrated that a real PhD Physical Chemist did indeed make the statement that I had claimed had been made

Subduction Zone completely refused

I mean COMPLETELY

to accept that he was wrong
Russell

Canberra, Australia

#1580 Dec 6, 2012
And ANOTHER BOLD FACED LIE
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
Once again tard, how was I wrong?
And then
Here comes the UTTER BIGOTRY
Subduction Zone wrote:
And no, he is not an excellent scientist. He is a lying scumbag and even he knows it. He is ruined for any real life in his chosen profession since he has shown that he cannot be trusted to do scientific work. That is why he joined that creationist cult.
So, since he's a creationist he is a lying scumbag?
Russell

Canberra, Australia

#1581 Dec 6, 2012
So, Subduction Zone
By your own words
By your own admission

You are

A lying

Ignorant

Bigot

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 26 min Brian_G 31,381
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 35 min Agents of Corruption 197,535
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 47 min emperorjohn 13,332
Rome Viharo debunks evolution 8 hr Paul Porter1 2
News It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09) 9 hr Paul Porter1 151,011
Evolution in action May 27 MIDutch 1
News RANT: Is "global warming" today's version of th... May 25 bearings 2
More from around the web