what do you want a cookie?<quoted text>
He posted 3 statements.
His 3rd statement was a "conclusion" based on the first 2.
He failed utterly, to show that statement #1 was, in fact true-- it wasn't.
I demonstrated a possible condition where it was NOT true-- therefore his assumption that it was true for ALL cases was false.
He failed to show that statement #2 was true for all cases. He didn't even show it was true for SOME cases-- he expected everyone to just take it "on faith"-- or at his [untrustworthy] word.
In order for his statement #3 to be true--#1 and #2 HAD to be true for ALL CASES-- which they were not.#3 was dependent on #1 AND #2 being COMPLETELY TRUE.
Therefore his statement #3 was false.
It is basic logic.
seriously this is the like 5th time youve said that youve proved him wrong.
#1 no you didnt prove anything
#2 you just made up a bunch of none sense that only makes sense to you
#3 your an idiot