Again,*what is your point*?(And what is it with this gibberish you seem so fond of?)That the theory of evolution, including common descent, is very well supported by the evidence is NOT in dispute by me. Told you before look for someone else to chat ya fukry to
Which they are, as they are of different populations that lived in different parts of the world, meaning that they had different combinations of alleles. So what?when it comes to Darwin you still wrote a bunch of fuckry like: "Darwin never claimed that whites and blacks were of different species"
The truth is of course that Darwin writes in his own words "I shd look at races of man as deserving to be called distinct species"
It does not matter which definition of species you use Darwin believed that races or species 'of man' were different.
You can disagree all you like, but you can't dispute the facts. Perhaps you don't understand the meaning of "normal". Common. Typical. Usual. Crime is normal. Poverty is normal. It doesn't mean that either one is desirable. Apparently, you've confused the concepts of "normal" and "desirable"."I didn't claim that it was unavoidable. But it was indeed normal, and it continues to this day."
I still disagree: Slavery remains widespread but it never was and never will be normal.