continuting from Existential Series: evolution
Posted in the Evolution Debate Forum
Since: Feb 13
#1 Jun 25, 2013
NAT’L SELECTION AS SPECIAL CREATION ??
Obviously, to deny an evolutionary process is to espouse a nihilism inclusive of God him-(it-)self ...unless we can envision a reverberant voice from heaven saying,“Hokus-pokus shazammm!!! Hokus-poku shazammm!!!” etc. an awful lot of times during a mere six day period. Even Genesis relates processes taking place in the formation of the earth, sun and moon, plants and creatures, as well as verily contains the infrastructural systematology of the living things in the very word ...GENEsis. And after the simplistifications of initial creation, this first book of the Bible goes on to trace dispersal and differentiation of mankind with the “beggaterama”.
No matter to what he attributes the cause, anyone rational can’t deny an evolutionary process.
But I am not alone in finding fictions of fixation within the factions and fact-ors [sic] of the neoDarwinian synthesis wherein the random micro-mutation (about the only acknowledged variation dynamic) seems to represent a “lottery-zation” of process nowhere else evident in the sciences or existence.
Micromutation is genetic mutation perse ,... and genetic, as we, as the componential or structural basis of 1)“whole-chromosomal selection”(a concept seemingly sneakily almost endowing selection with the capacity to choose what and how it’ll select), and 2)“punctuated equilibria”(which sure sounds like a specially created terminology of a stymied evolutionist trying to avoid any hint of saltational/creationistic phenomena by combining Lyelllian uniformitarian’s with hopscotch ....or running the gene of quantum mechanics).
Yes, Natural Selection has been ensconced as usurper of the throne of Special Creation. thus, the only evolutionary plan or “purpose” one might perceive would be an epiphenomenon of default!! Not any indication of design!!! But consider that such sheer “mindloess” selection from supposed pure random city has resulted in the essential in toto replication of existencep-in-essence as existence-in awareness in the mind (modular and domain) of man, in the codices of its expression and exchange (ciphers and symbols)..... and in the blink of time since chimpanzee!!
If, from evolutionary premise and temporality, we can exclude human cognition as communication as behavior, even as evolutionary-essence (justbecause we discern no “morphological” medium for the manifestation thus considered merely “metaphysical”), then there’s suddenly a significant realm for which “punctuated equilibria” doesn’t make it at all. Rather,“edited reality” or “expurgated evidence” might be a propos.
Also ponder that the obverse of the usual focus is really where the query should be at. It’s not so much that there’s an “incomplete” fossil record. There’s a drastic discontinuity of extant life forms which preponderant “Natural Rejection” might suitably term as process (but could not explain at all).... or saltations (macro-mutation variations) even unto a “gifted-monstrosity theory” could provide.(Actually there’s a sort of post-facto precedent for this latter widely occurring in ... metamorphosis!!!)
“Discontinuity of extant life forms” refers to an overwhelming absense of “trans-specie” gradations, intermediate critter-forms. Considering the vast, profound variation of species surviving in given biospheres and even niches, it would seem there should also be a selected breadth “in-specie”...perhaps even to the extent that “specie” state would be a matter of form defined (as by bell curve or spectrum, so to speak) from a somewhat pangenetic flow of incarnations and evolutions of phylogeny.
#2 Jun 26, 2013
“I am the great an powerful Ny!”
Since: Dec 06
#3 Jun 26, 2013
Since: May 08
#4 Jun 27, 2013
Add your comments below
|Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11)||8 min||Kong_||164,741|
|Should evolution be taught in high school? (Feb '08)||2 hr||kelly008||178,621|
|proof of gods existence .....or lack there of||3 hr||ChristineM||107|
|"Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12)||13 hr||lozzza||19,142|
|It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09)||18 hr||dirtclod||141,472|
|How would creationists explain... (Nov '14)||Mon||MikeF||490|
|When is Quote Mining Justified?||Sun||Zog Has-fallen||28|
Find what you want!
Search Evolution Debate Forum Now
Copyright © 2015 Topix LLC