Study proposes alternative way to explain life's complexity
Evolution skeptics argue that some biological structures, like the brain or the eye, are simply too complex for natural selection to explain.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at EurekAlert!.
Since: Apr 13
#1 Apr 25, 2013
That something cannot be explained by natural selection does NOT prove creation. Stop using false dichotomies. There are self-organizing forms of evolution, which are far more efficient than natural selection. And the term "intelligent design" is so vague it should not be used at all.
Add your comments below
|"Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12)||12 min||replaytime||61,510|
|One species or three||2 hr||pshun2404||1|
|It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09)||3 hr||djc||160,326|
|Curious dilemma about DNA||6 hr||Dogen||6|
|Nonsense of a high order: The confused world of...||8 hr||Dogen||2,699|
|Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09)||9 hr||Dogen||28,323|
|Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11)||18 hr||Horn Dog||220,673|
Find what you want!
Search Evolution Debate Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC