First Prev
of 6
Next Last
Level 6

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#103 Jan 19, 2013
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>Well tell us what you are and we will listen just as you say.
If you give me your attention, I will tell you what I am.
I'm a brilliant math'matician - also something of a ham.
I have tried for numerous degrees, in fact I've one of each;
Of course that makes me eminently qualified to teach.
I understand the subject matter thoroughly, it's true,
And I can't see why it isn't all as obvious to you.
Each lecture is a masterpiece, meticulously planned,
Yet everybody tells me that I'm hard to understand,
And I can't think why.

My diagrams are models of true art, you must agree,
And my handwriting is famous for its legibility.
Take a word like mmmmmm (minimum) to choose a random word,
For anyone to say he cannot read that, is absurd.
The anecdotes I tell get more amusing every year,
Though frankly, what they go to prove is sometimes less than clear,
And all my explanations are quite lucid, I am sure,
Yet everybody tells me that my lectures are obscure,
And I can't think why.

To generalize special relativity is as simple as can be,
Just eliminate unnecessary assumptions like linearity,
The consequences are equations for all dimensions I see
Physicists understanding physics is such a rarity.
They need to study science from a mathematician like me.

It's difficult to appreciate the intricacies of quantum parity,
General covariance is easy to construct in special relativity.

My derivation of spacetime is important, of that there is no doubt.
All these formulas are trivial if you only think them out.
Yet students tell me, "I have memorized the whole course through
Ev'rything that you've written, but the problems I can't do."
And I can't think why!

He can't think why!

http://www.everythingimportant.org/relativity...
MIDutch

Waterford, MI

#104 Jan 19, 2013
MikeF wrote:
<quoted text>
I consider myself qualified. I consider yourself to be a freaking nutcase. No point in wasting an excessive amount of time on the incorrigibly stupid.
Heck, even the SDAs thought he was a nutcase ... and that's saying something.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#105 Jan 20, 2013
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text>Historically speaking, Roman Catholicism epitomizes unparalleled presumption and the minimal principle.
Historically speaking, religious fundamentalists (such as yourself) epitomize unparalleled presumption and the minimal principle.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#106 Jan 20, 2013
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text>Why is it that when Jesus Christ speaks you don't believe it
Because it's always other people speaking on his behalf. Many of which just so happen to be superstitious nutjobs.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#107 Jan 20, 2013
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text>Well I do have that list: everythingimportant.org/dupery
Are you going to deny the obvious evidences of dershbaggery?
Oh, not at all. All of your posts are obvious evidence of Shoobmeister dershbaggery.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#108 Jan 20, 2013
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text>My professorship is irrelevant.
As are you.(shrug)
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#109 Jan 20, 2013
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text>That's the natural consequence of believing that a mastery of "just-so stories" constitute science. The real clincher, of course, is in being astonishingly untrained in the greatest science ever contemplated by the human mind.
Oh, such irony coming from one who pretends that quantum physics is evidence of invisible Jewish magic.
Level 6

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#111 Jan 20, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Historically speaking, religious fundamentalists (such as yourself)
I am not a Christian fundamentalist. However, I do think of myself as being in the Hilbert class of fundamentalist mathematicians.
Level 6

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#112 Jan 20, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, such irony coming from one who pretends that quantum physics is evidence of invisible Jewish magic.
I don't recall proving any theorem like that. Please cite the link.

“The strength of science is”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

founded in facts.

#113 Jan 21, 2013
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text>If you give me your attention, I will tell you what I am.
I'm a brilliant math'matician - also something of a ham.
I have tried for numerous degrees, in fact I've one of each;
Of course that makes me eminently qualified to teach.
I understand the subject matter thoroughly, it's true,
And I can't see why it isn't all as obvious to you.
Each lecture is a masterpiece, meticulously planned,
Yet everybody tells me that I'm hard to understand,
And I can't think why.
My diagrams are models of true art, you must agree,
And my handwriting is famous for its legibility.
Take a word like mmmmmm (minimum) to choose a random word,
For anyone to say he cannot read that, is absurd.
The anecdotes I tell get more amusing every year,
Though frankly, what they go to prove is sometimes less than clear,
And all my explanations are quite lucid, I am sure,
Yet everybody tells me that my lectures are obscure,
And I can't think why.
To generalize special relativity is as simple as can be,
Just eliminate unnecessary assumptions like linearity,
The consequences are equations for all dimensions I see
Physicists understanding physics is such a rarity.
They need to study science from a mathematician like me.
It's difficult to appreciate the intricacies of quantum parity,
General covariance is easy to construct in special relativity.
My derivation of spacetime is important, of that there is no doubt.
All these formulas are trivial if you only think them out.
Yet students tell me, "I have memorized the whole course through
Ev'rything that you've written, but the problems I can't do."
And I can't think why!
He can't think why!
http://www.everythingimportant.org/relativity...
So basically, you aren't going to provide a serious answer to the question. I can understand, I have met other people that felt they were deserving of more than what they had achieved.

I have read your blog with little interest and I can tell you that is the proper amount of interest to expend while doing so. No need to expand upon that. I believe that it is hard for people to understand you, yet I am aware of professionals out there that can explain your all too mundane position quite easily.

Thank you for your time. I believe I have what I need to know and perhaps I knew it all along.

“The strength of science is”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

founded in facts.

#114 Jan 21, 2013
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text>You obviously live a sheltered life when it comes to knowing about academic life and the world plague of misguided zealots.
Case in point is Professor Norman Finkelstein losing his job for speaking unpopular truths because of dershbags like Alan Dershowitz.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =P8ENawcSliAXX
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Shall I name all the dershbags that oppose me by all dishonest means possible?
I would be interested in seeing you list all the people that oppose you by honest means. That list surely must be as long in your mind as the other.

“The strength of science is”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

founded in facts.

#115 Jan 21, 2013
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text>And you are not qualified to discuss "Dr. Kenneth Miller on Science and Religion" because you don't understand either one.
All the smoke you blow up all those butts and you make a statement like that. You can add mastered hypocrisy today to you list of achievements. Sure, sure, that skill was probabaly achieved years ago.

“The strength of science is”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

founded in facts.

#116 Jan 21, 2013
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text>If you give me your attention, I will tell you what I am.
I'm a brilliant math'matician - also something of a ham.
I have tried for numerous degrees, in fact I've one of each;
Of course that makes me eminently qualified to teach.
I understand the subject matter thoroughly, it's true,
And I can't see why it isn't all as obvious to you.
Each lecture is a masterpiece, meticulously planned,
Yet everybody tells me that I'm hard to understand,
And I can't think why.
My diagrams are models of true art, you must agree,
And my handwriting is famous for its legibility.
Take a word like mmmmmm (minimum) to choose a random word,
For anyone to say he cannot read that, is absurd.
The anecdotes I tell get more amusing every year,
Though frankly, what they go to prove is sometimes less than clear,
And all my explanations are quite lucid, I am sure,
Yet everybody tells me that my lectures are obscure,
And I can't think why.
To generalize special relativity is as simple as can be,
Just eliminate unnecessary assumptions like linearity,
The consequences are equations for all dimensions I see
Physicists understanding physics is such a rarity.
They need to study science from a mathematician like me.
It's difficult to appreciate the intricacies of quantum parity,
General covariance is easy to construct in special relativity.
My derivation of spacetime is important, of that there is no doubt.
All these formulas are trivial if you only think them out.
Yet students tell me, "I have memorized the whole course through
Ev'rything that you've written, but the problems I can't do."
And I can't think why!
He can't think why!
http://www.everythingimportant.org/relativity...
As long as I am firing a few parting shots and collecting some points, I will end with this question.

Does the queen have to give you her child if she can't guess your name?

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#117 Jan 31, 2013
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text>How pathetic is it to be a willfully blind ignoramus? The parallels exist. If you hate Jesus, you should hate me also. Don't you believe the words of Jesus?
John 15
18 If the world hates you, you know that it hated Me before it hated you. 19 If you were of the world, the world would love its own. Yet because you are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world, therefore the world hates you. 20 Remember the word that I said to you,A servant is not greater than his master. If they persecuted Me, they will also persecute you. If they kept My word, they will keep yours also. 21 But all these things they will do to you for My names sake, because they do not know Him who sent Me.
This thread went on and on since i last posted.

We have three gospel stories that read like reports to some authority, all based on heresay and getting it wrong mostly, about what's going on in that province called judea.
They have been rewritten countless times, name of jesus introduced and so on. The only christian bible of which the publication is a sure fact is the Russian bible 10 century (i could be more precise, but do not feel like searching for that now, and it's beside the point.)
The history of the western church is a contradictory mess, unlike the one from the eastern church. Such things as publication and f.i. agreeing on who was f.i. the first pope of jerusalem.
And here i read the theology of JOhn, that has nothing do with actual events but are an interpretation. An actual theology, telling people how to understand what the stories are about.
The Vatican will tell you that everything is frankly nonsens but if you take them as dogma/articles of faith then your one of them.
But i forgot Paul, since just about all christians are Paulinians.

But hundredthousands were cruxified, and it went on and on in the name of god. But YHWH forbade any killing especially in his name.
Never had a son, nor any attention of sacrificing it's essence.
As if some payback from f.i. the flood was demanded by the people.
No, what you got is Ceasar, first emperor god, emulating Alexander, and his sons, claiming the same.
The laws were abolished and you get some spirit, that's pretty useless, since all can claim it and ask money for it.
You did compare yourselve with a formerly unnamed character called simple man/handworksman/gullible/ folks.(right some early text report what the people say and later attributed to jesus.)
And we do call that a martyr complex.
Not because of what we believe, but because that is the way it is generally termed.
Napoleon complex a.s.o.

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#118 Jan 31, 2013
;) more a case of:
I clearly can't keep you away from my son, I guess I'm just gonna have to keep my son away from you.

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#119 Jan 31, 2013
http://www.encyclopedia.com/video/DBMK0BTDFFU...
No kidding, finaly go online!
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#120 Feb 1, 2013
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text>I don't recall proving any theorem like that.
Me neither.(shrug)

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 6
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 5 min Dogen 133,993
How would creationists explain... 11 min Dogen 435
An atheistic view on evolution vs. a godly view... 25 min Dogen 682
Science News (Sep '13) Wed positronium 2,944
god is not real!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Jun '06) Dec 22 Chimney1 13,624
Creationism coming to Ohio classrooms? Not with... Dec 20 nobody 7
24 hour dental emergency (Nov '13) Dec 19 Zach 4
More from around the web