Dr. Kenneth Miller on Science and Re...

Dr. Kenneth Miller on Science and Religion

Posted in the Evolution Debate Forum

First Prev
of 6
Next Last

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#1 Jan 11, 2013
"But on a personal level -- and I will state this plainly -- it seems to me that any faith that might require the rejection of scientific reason is not a faith worth having." - ken Miller

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kenneth-r-mille...
Level 6

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#2 Jan 11, 2013
It seems to me -- and I will state this plainly - that Kenneth Miller's faith in the minimal principle of popery is just as irrational as his unquestioning trust in "the Primary Axiom of biology."

http://everythingimportant.org/
http://everythingimportant.org/genome.pdf

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#3 Jan 11, 2013
Shubee wrote:
It seems to me -- and I will state this plainly - that Kenneth Miller's faith in the minimal principle of popery is just as irrational as his unquestioning trust in "the Primary Axiom of biology."
http://everythingimportant.org/
http://everythingimportant.org/genome.pdf
No one cares what you think, Eugene.
Level 6

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#4 Jan 11, 2013
Shubee wrote:
It seems to me -- and I will state this plainly - that Kenneth Miller's faith in the minimal principle of popery is just as irrational as his unquestioning trust in "the Primary Axiom of biology."
http://everythingimportant.org/
http://everythingimportant.org/genome.pdf
Put another way, if Kenneth Miller is obviously misguided to trust the minimal principle of popery, then why can't he be just as unreasonable to unquestioningly trust "the Primary Axiom of biology"?

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#5 Jan 11, 2013
The pope called. He said you can f**k off.

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#6 Jan 11, 2013
MikeF wrote:
The pope called. He said you can f**k off.
Actually, the Pope said: "Eugenii, proficiscetur fornicandi teipsum."

(Google Translate can be soooooo much fun!)
Level 6

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#7 Jan 11, 2013
Se Kenneth Miller ovviamente fuorviante considerare attendibile il principio minimo di papismo, allora perch non pu essere altrettanto irragionevole fidarsi ciecamente "l'assioma primario di biologia"
LowellGuy

Haverhill, MA

#8 Jan 11, 2013
Eugene, when you finally decide that evidence matters, we'll care what you say. Until then, just keep telling your fairy tales.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#9 Jan 11, 2013
MikeF wrote:
The pope called. He said you can f**k off.
<As Shubee> But the pope, anti-Christ. Enemy of mankind. Really. It is all in the Bible, if you read it right.

Which of course means the way I read it.
Level 6

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#10 Jan 12, 2013
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text>Put another way, if Kenneth Miller is obviously misguided to trust the minimal principle of popery, then why can't he be just as unreasonable to unquestioningly trust "the Primary Axiom of biology"?
Still no honest answer to my challenging question? That's precisely what I should expect from the cult of Darwin.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#11 Jan 12, 2013
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text>Still no honest answer to my challenging question? That's precisely what I should expect from the cult of Darwin.
Right, you owed us honest answers for years. Quit lying and you will get all of the answers you want.

It is always funny when a creationist of all things tries to demand an honest answer and accuses others of being in a weird version of Christianity.
Level 6

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#12 Jan 12, 2013
Get a load of these shameless liars.
LowellGuy wrote:
Eugene, when you finally decide that evidence matters, we'll care what you say. Until then, just keep telling your fairy tales.
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
Right, you owed us honest answers for years. Quit lying and you will get all of the answers you want.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#13 Jan 12, 2013
Shubee wrote:
Get a load of these shameless liars.
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Where are the shameless lies?

I see two people, one of them me, pointing out the simple fact that you have lied for years here and would not know a true statement if it bit you on the ass.

Once again, as even your invisible friend advised you to do, get rid of the beam in your eye before you complain about the mote in the eye of your brother.

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#14 Jan 12, 2013
Popism? A clear case of presbyacusis, if you ask me.

As in google deteriation, repair etc. of mit.DNA.
K. Miller has the focus on Y-DNA.
Level 6

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#15 Jan 12, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
you have lied for years here
Thank you liar. If you have a link to refute my key writings, then post it here.

http://everythingimportant.org/
http://everythingimportant.org/genome.pdf
http://everythingimportant.org/devolution
http://everythingimportant.org/naturalism
http://everythingimportant.org/science

Give it your best shot.

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#16 Jan 13, 2013
Ouch, it's another testcase before he tries it on his 10 years old.

Please send the mites to a normal school.

Level 5

Since: Apr 12

Taizhou, China

#17 Jan 13, 2013
Shubee wrote:
Put another way, if Kenneth Miller is obviously misguided to trust the minimal principle of popery, then why can't he be just as unreasonable to unquestioningly trust "the Primary Axiom of biology"?
What makes you think he unquestioningly trusts Evolutionary theory?
Doesn't he have first-hand experience in science?
Level 6

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#18 Jan 13, 2013
Thomas Robertson wrote:
<quoted text>
What makes you think he unquestioningly trusts Evolutionary theory?
That conclusion follows from the flattering presupposition that Kenneth Miller's mind is uniformly logical. Consequently, it is to be expected that Kenneth Miller has comparable reverence for the pope and Charles Darwin.
Level 6

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#19 Jan 13, 2013
Thomas Robertson wrote:
Doesn't he have first-hand experience in science?
Don't you believe that Dr. Kenneth Miller has equal respect for science and religion?
MIDutch

Waterford, MI

#20 Jan 13, 2013
LowellGuy wrote:
Eugene, when you finally decide that evidence matters, we'll care what you say.
Not likely. Eugene has always been a joke (you can google his ABYSMAL FAILURES discussing science and math with real scientists and mathematicians on the internet). Eugene will continue on being a joke.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 6
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Why Atheist Richard Dawkins Supports Religious ... (Jun '17) 2 min dollarsbill 4,859
News It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09) 17 min Genesis Enigma 165,403
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 3 hr Subduction Zone 85,540
What's your religion? 4 hr Subduction Zone 17
God hates Tennessee 10 hr MakinProgress 5
Experiment In Evolution, Genetic Algorithms and... Mon was auch immer 8
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) Mon Dogen 33,127
More from around the web