Creationists Urge Texas Ed Board to '...

Creationists Urge Texas Ed Board to 'Strike the Final Blow to the...

There are 290 comments on the Dallas Observer story from Sep 18, 2013, titled Creationists Urge Texas Ed Board to 'Strike the Final Blow to the.... In it, Dallas Observer reports that:

Don McLeroy, a Bryan dentist and former Texas State Board of Education Chairman who made a star turn as the anti-science Sunday school teacher in last year's "The Revisionaries" , was unseated from the board in the 2010 Republican primary.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Dallas Observer.

The Dude

Macclesfield, UK

#225 Nov 12, 2013
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text> I said that God was infallible. And I said that is a conclusion that follows from my definition. My definition of God is that He is the greatest being that could exist without contradiction with maximally divine attributes. Thus, it's inconceivable that God could be more righteous, more loving, more merciful, more gracious, more powerful, more knowledgeable, more infallible, etc. etc. than He already is. That is my axiom.
Can God create a rock so heavy He cannot lift?

Busted.

This is why philosophical concepts fail in practical reality.

Oh, not to mention your complete and total lack of scientific evidence to support your "axiom" in the first place.
The Dude

Macclesfield, UK

#226 Nov 12, 2013
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text> As I said before, I was a quantum creationist long before Professor Hawking became a quantum creationist. So you are dishonest. As for who was the first quantum creationist, thatís anyoneís guess, but here is a discussion thread where I tell the story of how I became a quantum creationist while still in high school, which was a few years before Steven Hawking even began to study quantum gravity and quantum mechanics.

So your accusation of me cherry-picking is just plain silly.
Pretending science supports supernatural Godpoofing is dishonest. Pretending you're a scientist is dishonest. Ergo you are dishonest.

But then, everyone here, you included, already know that you are a liar. A fact you have confirmed numerous times in this forum.
The Dude

Macclesfield, UK

#227 Nov 12, 2013
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text> I thought I denied being in the same league with Professor S.W. Hawking. Didnít I say that his writings on quantum creationism donít even contain a particle of scientific originality?
<quoted text> However, I believe itís obvious that my proof of The First Fundamental Theorem of Molecular Creationism is original, legitimate science.
Sure. Just as soon as you show us a talking lizard or donkey.
The Dude

Macclesfield, UK

#228 Nov 12, 2013
Shubee wrote:
Deal with it. Begin by confessing that quantum creationism is established science and that you are an ignoramus.
Of course context is important. The word "creation" is not necessarily intrinsically linked to invisible magic Jews, whereas "creationism" is. Hence by ignoring context you can pretend that actual scientists support your baseless religious pseudo-scientific BS. If only you had something to offer the world other than word-games and light entertainment.
The Dude

Macclesfield, UK

#229 Nov 12, 2013
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text> Hawking is famous, probably for the same reason that Kim Kardashian is famous. In general, the world loves those who prostitute themselves.
Do you know why Jesus was crucified?
Crucified, but not sacrificed. A subtle but important distinction. Such subtleties are lost on creationists.

“May you be at peace.”

Since: Nov 07

Mars

#230 Nov 12, 2013
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text> Here's the proof: Post #187:
<quoted text>

Is everybody in Texas as dumb as you?
Level 6

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#231 Nov 12, 2013
The Dude wrote:
The word "creation" is not necessarily intrinsically linked to invisible magic Jews, whereas "creationism" is.
cre∑a∑tion∑ism
noun
1. the doctrine that matter and all things were created, substantially as they now exist, by an omnipotent Creator, and not gradually evolved or developed.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/creati...
2. the doctrine that ascribes the origins of all things to God's acts of creation rather than to evolution
World English Dictionary
Level 6

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#232 Nov 12, 2013
The Dude wrote:
Can God create a rock so heavy He cannot lift?
Obviously not.
Level 6

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#233 Nov 12, 2013
The Dude wrote:
Pretending science supports supernatural Godpoofing is dishonest.
So stop being dishonest. Godpoofing is your interpretation of the supernatural physics of spontaneous quantum creating.
Level 6

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#234 Nov 12, 2013
The Dude wrote:
We know. Therefore God's infallibility does not follow from the term until you provide an objective definition. Since no-one on Earth can,...
Hold it right there silly man. I have the perfect accurate definition of God:
http://www.everythingimportant.org/SDA/viewto...
Level 6

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#235 Nov 12, 2013
Yet I proved The First Fundamental Theorem of Molecular Creationism and Professor S.W. Hawking isn't even able to admit or deny that my theorem is true.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#236 Nov 12, 2013
Shubee wrote:
Yet I proved The First Fundamental Theorem of Molecular Creationism and Professor S.W. Hawking isn't even able to admit or deny that my theorem is true.
yet no one else has heard of it. are you keeping it a secret?(obviously not...) so basically, no one else on this planet that has seen thinks it is worthy of talking about...

shouldn't this give you a clue?
Level 6

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#237 Nov 12, 2013
The Dude wrote:
Oh, not to mention your complete and total lack of scientific evidence to support your "axiom" in the first place.
Likewise, there is a total lack of scientific evidence to support the parallel postulate.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#238 Nov 12, 2013
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text> Hold it right there silly man. I have the perfect accurate definition of God:
http://www.everythingimportant.org/SDA/viewto...
so do I. Proven myth.
Level 6

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#239 Nov 12, 2013
cre∑a∑tion∑ism
: a doctrine or theory holding that matter, the various forms of life, and the world were created by God out of nothing and usually in the way described in Genesis
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cre...
Level 6

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#240 Nov 12, 2013
creationism
noun
The belief that matter, the various forms of life, and the world were created by God out of nothing.
(Concise Encyclopedia)

“Merry Christmas”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

Happy New Year

#241 Nov 12, 2013
Shubee wrote:
Yet I proved The First Fundamental Theorem of Molecular Creationism and Professor S.W. Hawking isn't even able to admit or deny that my theorem is true.
Albert Einstein is unable to deny my corrections to his theory as well. Stephen Hawking can't deny it either. I must be a genius because of that.

Eat the sarcasm. Use a spoon.

“Merry Christmas”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

Happy New Year

#242 Nov 12, 2013
Shubee wrote:
Yet I proved The First Fundamental Theorem of Molecular Creationism and Professor S.W. Hawking isn't even able to admit or deny that my theorem is true.
S.W. Hawking isn't able to admit or deny that my theorem of the quantum tunneling of your ignorance.

“Merry Christmas”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

Happy New Year

#243 Nov 12, 2013
Chilli J wrote:
<quoted text>
I already know much more about him than I ever wanted to. I just channeled his obviously bloated self-image; his extremist, fervent, wishful fundie excuse-making and "interpretation" and his self-granted first "Spontaneous Quantum Creationist-Contortionist " mantle.
Then I added a large dash of bluff, bit of braggadocio, half-teaspoon of clueless, big pinch of desperate, 2 teaspoons of flightful fancy, small truckload of totally-unsupported rationalization, two semi loads of self-delusional and 50 of 60 cubic yards of wishful thinking.
Sadly, for him, the fact that I know him better than his family does is by their own choice. It's highly probable that he's even more of an insufferable bore and windy braggart in person than he is here. To paraphrase: "Mamas don't let your babies grow up to be Shubees!"
I was right you know him better than his family or that panel of psychiatrists that are trying to determine how batshit insane he is.

That last line has got to be the winner of the best line of the week, maybe the month.
Level 6

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#244 Nov 12, 2013
I see that none of you retards are capable of debating spontaneous quantum creationism.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Womans Birth Cycle absolutely Proves Design and... 42 min Endofdays 73
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 47 min Endofdays 93,421
News It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09) 51 min Endofdays 167,975
Why the Big Bang is ALL WRONG. Mon Rose_NoHo 85
What's your religion? (Sep '17) Mon was auch immer 1,156
News Why Atheist Richard Dawkins Supports Religious ... (Jun '17) Mon superwilly 6,056
List what Evolution Discoveries have helped SCI... Mon MIDutch 14