Facts About the Missing Link
SupaAFC

Bristol, UK

#21 Dec 21, 2009
Shasha Munzara wrote:
Today, women still get sexually aroused by the sight of a wriggling snake.(try hiss at them, immoral ones will fall for it, while lecherous men fall for wiggling mincing lizard eyed whores etc).
Candidate for FSTDT, surely.
The Dude

Wallasey, UK

#22 Dec 21, 2009
SupaAFC wrote:
<quoted text>
Candidate for FSTDT, surely.
And permanent isolation.

“Wear white at night.”

Since: Jun 09

Albuquerque

#23 Dec 21, 2009
SupaAFC wrote:
<quoted text>
Candidate for FSTDT, surely.
FSTDT. I had to look it up. The FSTDT quotes for a month don't hold a candle to what we find here in a day.
SupaAFC

Bristol, UK

#24 Dec 21, 2009
15th Dalai Lama wrote:
<quoted text>
FSTDT. I had to look it up. The FSTDT quotes for a month don't hold a candle to what we find here in a day.
Eeeexactly.

Although, I guess the OP was referring to another "wriggling snake". THAT would make sense.

“Wear white at night.”

Since: Jun 09

Albuquerque

#25 Dec 21, 2009
SupaAFC wrote:
<quoted text>
Eeeexactly.
Although, I guess the OP was referring to another "wriggling snake". THAT would make sense.
We should probably keep our microcephalic fundies to ourselves lest the FSTDT list managers be embarrassed.
Sheila

Texarkana, TX

#26 Dec 21, 2009
SupaAFC wrote:
<quoted text>
Eeeexactly.
Although, I guess the OP was referring to another "wriggling snake". THAT would make sense.
Aaaah, the mighty Pazuzu has wormed his way onto this thread. It was only a matter of time.

;)

“There is no such thing”

Level 3

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

#27 Dec 23, 2009
Sheila wrote:
<quoted text>Aaaah, the mighty Pazuzu has wormed his way onto this thread. It was only a matter of time.
;)
You mean Hanbi's little bot?

“There is no such thing”

Level 3

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

#28 Dec 23, 2009
bot+boy
Sheila

Texarkana, TX

#29 Dec 23, 2009
Lil Ticked wrote:
<quoted text>You mean Hanbi's little bot?
The numero uno demon, described as having wings and a snake for a penis. Had his own little cult/group of followers in the middle East. There are people here who worship him now.
mrbananas

Worcester, MA

#30 Dec 23, 2009
so the missing link is a serpent. does it by chance have an odd number of eyes?
Sheila

Texarkana, TX

#31 Dec 23, 2009
mrbananas wrote:
so the missing link is a serpent. does it by chance have an odd number of eyes?
A one-eyed worm?
SupaAFC

Bristol, UK

#32 Dec 23, 2009
Sheila wrote:
<quoted text>The numero uno demon, described as having wings and a snake for a penis. Had his own little cult/group of followers in the middle East. There are people here who worship him now.
Oh lawd.

sounds hissterical.
Pete

Chicago, IL

#33 Feb 21, 2013
I really feel God led me here, as I was doing a search to verify one of those please post to find the missing child items as they can float around Facebook long after the child is recovered.
I wanted to point out, This is the most non-biblical ignorant load of horse pucky I have encountered in years.
A leftover of a period of time when people tried to use the Bible to justify their racism. Just as they attempted to use the science of evolution to justify that selfsame racism and slavery I must point out.
Also, I ask that you not confuse this poor ignorant deluded woman who has no understanding of the original Language or meaning of the texts which kind of quotes, With those who merely wish that their children not be taught as a matter of fact that all here is the process of random chance, Without allowing for the possibility of a creator which is something that if you have any understanding of logic or science cannot be disproven.
Elohim

Branford, CT

#34 Feb 21, 2013
Pete wrote:
I really feel God led me here, as I was doing a search to verify one of those please post to find the missing child items as they can float around Facebook long after the child is recovered.
I wanted to point out, This is the most non-biblical ignorant load of horse pucky I have encountered in years.
A leftover of a period of time when people tried to use the Bible to justify their racism. Just as they attempted to use the science of evolution to justify that selfsame racism and slavery I must point out.
Also, I ask that you not confuse this poor ignorant deluded woman who has no understanding of the original Language or meaning of the texts which kind of quotes, With those who merely wish that their children not be taught as a matter of fact that all here is the process of random chance, Without allowing for the possibility of a creator which is something that if you have any understanding of logic or science cannot be disproven.
Science cares not for your god or any of the other thousands of gods man has concocted.
Pete

La Grange, IL

#35 Feb 23, 2013
Elohim wrote:
<quoted text>Science cares not for your god or any of the other thousands of gods man has concocted.
Thanks so much for being polite respecting other people's beliefs.(Please note the sarcasm )

God still cares for you.

And I still care for you.
If you want to actually think about it science doesn't "Care" for anything because it is After all not a person but a set of rules for determining how the physical world works. Odd but if you wish to treat it like an entity with motivation fell free.

This is especially disturbing seeing as how my post was responding not to any scientific fact. But to the inaccuracy of her religious biblical opinion.

You however felt the need to beat up on all people of faith across the entire world. And you wonder why people so attacked Feel the need to insulate their children from your and others like you and your insistence on proclaiming that the teaching of science necessitates the disbelief in God.

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#36 Feb 23, 2013
Pete wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks so much for being polite respecting other people's beliefs.(Please note the sarcasm )
God still cares for you.
And I still care for you.
That's nice (Please note the sarcasm).

YOU come on here, and present us with:
Pete wrote:
I really feel God led me here, as I was doing a search to verify one of those please post to find the missing child items as they can float around Facebook long after the child is recovered.
I wanted to point out, This is the most non-biblical ignorant load of horse pucky I have encountered in years.
Perhaps God led you here to learn about the science. You know, the evidence He left us that tells us how He provided for the diversity of life on earth.
Pete wrote:
<quoted text>If you want to actually think about it science doesn't "Care" for anything because it is After all not a person but a set of rules for determining how the physical world works. Odd but if you wish to treat it like an entity with motivation fell free.
This is especially disturbing seeing as how my post was responding not to any scientific fact. But to the inaccuracy of her religious biblical opinion.
Inaccurate according to who?

YOU?

...and who are YOU again?

...and how can one's **OPINION**-- your words -- be inaccurate?
Pete wrote:
<quoted text>You however felt the need to beat up on all people of faith across the entire world.
Wrong. We only disrespect persons who seek to impose bronze-age religious belief in place of established, observed, scientific fact.

As to this, how old is the earth?

(a) 4.5 Billion years old
(b) 10,000 years old or less
Pete wrote:
<quoted text>And you wonder why people so attacked Feel the need to insulate their children from your and others like you and your insistence on proclaiming that the teaching of science necessitates the disbelief in God.
Again, wrong. Science has no position on God. Most scientists are persons of faith. Ignorant fundimentalists such as yourself are frightened because the findings of science tend to disrupt their belief as to the LITERAL, INFALLIBLE interpretation as to Genesis.

Get lost.
Elohim

Branford, CT

#37 Feb 25, 2013
Pete wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks so much for being polite respecting other people's beliefs.(Please note the sarcasm )
God still cares for you.
And I still care for you.
If you want to actually think about it science doesn't "Care" for anything because it is After all not a person but a set of rules for determining how the physical world works. Odd but if you wish to treat it like an entity with motivation fell free.
This is especially disturbing seeing as how my post was responding not to any scientific fact. But to the inaccuracy of her religious biblical opinion.
You however felt the need to beat up on all people of faith across the entire world. And you wonder why people so attacked Feel the need to insulate their children from your and others like you and your insistence on proclaiming that the teaching of science necessitates the disbelief in God.
1) Thanks. Now if you and your ilk would respect my right not to believe in your fairy tales the world would be a much better place.
2)I still don't care about your god or any of the other thousands of gods. Thank you tho for the warm thoughts. I too care for the well being of my fellow man.
3) How is her OPINION of the bible any less valid than your own?
4) Interesting how you feel the need to be persecuted and have the foolish idea that "that the teaching of science necessitates the disbelief in God." The thousands of god believing scientists would disagree with you.
TBi

Philadelphia, PA

#38 Feb 26, 2013
This shouldnt even be a debate!

"A man's predicament is guided by his morality" - C.Burke

www.taylor-biggar.com
Pete

La Grange, IL

#39 Mar 1, 2013
1. I love that you assume I'm up fundamentalist, thus ascribing me believes and opinions which I never stated, or heled and attack them.

2. Her statement was biblically inaccurate according to the vast majority of Christians. Also, with post after post attacking her opinions, I seem to be the first person who's right to challenge her opinion was challenged.

3. In the very statement where you qwestion my opinion on why God led me here. You demand what right I have to qwestion someone else's opinion on a religious matter.

4. I never said I feel the teaching of science necessitates a disbelieve in God. I said that ignorant people who do not understand science but treated as a God, act that way.

5.I love that you assume I don't know about evolution, or believe in it.

6. I love in how the same sentence were you demand respect to believe as you will, you insist on describing my religious convictions in an extremely demeaning manner.

My post was basically to point out that this woman is just as whacked to most religious people, Including Bible believing Christians, as she was to most non-religious people.

And also that I felt this trend in some of the posts to associate her with everyone of faith, and or use her statements to paint with a broad brush was most unfair.
The Dude

Macclesfield, UK

#40 Mar 4, 2013
Pete wrote:
I really feel God led me here, as I was doing a search to verify one of those please post to find the missing child items as they can float around Facebook long after the child is recovered.
I wanted to point out, This is the most non-biblical ignorant load of horse pucky I have encountered in years.
A leftover of a period of time when people tried to use the Bible to justify their racism. Just as they attempted to use the science of evolution to justify that selfsame racism and slavery I must point out.
Yes, without a doubt Shasha is not a full picnic.
Pete wrote:
Also, I ask that you not confuse this poor ignorant deluded woman who has no understanding of the original Language or meaning of the texts which kind of quotes, With those who merely wish that their children not be taught as a matter of fact that all here is the process of random chance, Without allowing for the possibility of a creator which is something that if you have any understanding of logic or science cannot be disproven.
Yes, the 'Creator' proposal cannot be disproven. Hence it is not scientific.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 29 min THE LONE WORKER 220,746
One species or three 39 min Timmee 65
News It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09) 50 min Timmee 160,351
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 1 hr 15th Dalai Lama 61,724
Evolution never happened 8 hr Subduction Zone 4
News Nonsense of a high order: The confused world of... 14 hr Dogen 2,757
Curious dilemma about DNA 22 hr Timmee 18
More from around the web