Falsification of evolution is simple."Wrong, at this point if we are not related to apes there is something seriously wrong with the theory."
Not at all. Again, it would just mean that the actual descendants of humanity are unknown, just another missing link. And there are a lot of missing links.
"Once again, if evolution was wrong DNA would almost definitely would have shown it. It did the exact opposite."
It does nothing at all. The claim is, evolution can only be observed in very large time scales, like several thousands of years. So it's impossible to observe meaningful changes of the DNA live. Doesn't matter if you believe in evolution or not.
But that was not even the actual topic. I want to discuss the falsifiability of evolution here, and my examples were just that, examples. Doesn't matter how unlikely they are, my claim is that even if my examples were valid, the general paradigm of evolution could not be falsified because it's impossible to refute.
All you have to do is find a fossil that predates its possible evolutionary antecedents.