The Satanic Character of Social Darwi...

The Satanic Character of Social Darwinism

Posted in the Evolution Debate Forum

First Prev
of 40
Next Last

Since: Feb 14

Location hidden

#1 Aug 13, 2014
The Satanic Character of Social Darwinism


"You are of your father the devil, and you want to do the desires of your father. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth because there is no truth in him. Whenever he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own nature, for he is a liar and the father of lies." John 8:44.

Since: Feb 14

Location hidden

#2 Aug 14, 2014

“Dinosaurs survived the flood!”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

Jesus probably rode dinosaurs!

#3 Aug 14, 2014
Zog Has-fallen wrote:
The Satanic Character of Social Darwinism
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =9n900e80R30XX
"You are of your father the devil, and you want to do the desires of your father. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth because there is no truth in him. Whenever he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own nature, for he is a liar and the father of lies." John 8:44.
It is an odd confession you make here, but I accept it based on all previous facts.

Since: Feb 14

Location hidden

#4 Aug 14, 2014
DanFromSmithville wrote:
It is an odd confession you make here,
Permit me then to insert this clarification: Social Darwinists are Satanists.

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#5 Aug 14, 2014
Zog Has-fallen wrote:
<quoted text> Permit me then to insert this clarification: Social Darwinists are Satanists.
Since we're arguing for the validity of BIOLOGICAL evolution -- not the irrelevant "SOCIAL Darwinism" -- I feel comfortable in saying that *IF* there were Supernatural Beings of "Good" and "Evil", you would probably be correct.

Since you -- or anyone, for that matter -- have yet to present evidence of the supernatural, AND since we're discussing BIOLOGICAL evolution here, this entire thread is pointless.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#6 Aug 14, 2014
Look out. Shoobee's gibbering again.

Since: Feb 14

Location hidden

#7 Aug 14, 2014
Kong_ wrote:
Since we're arguing for the validity of BIOLOGICAL evolution -- not the irrelevant "SOCIAL Darwinism" ...
You forget: I accept biological change over time. My argument is that if Darwinism is correct, then all the logical implications of Darwinism are valid. One significant logical implication of Darwinism, if you care to face it, is that Darwinists are Satanists.

Since: Feb 14

Location hidden

#8 Aug 14, 2014
Kong_ wrote:
I feel comfortable in saying that *IF* there were Supernatural Beings of "Good" and "Evil", you would probably be correct.
Are you comfortable facing your demons while watching the powerful 14 minute youtube documentary in the opening post?

Since: Feb 14

Location hidden

#9 Aug 14, 2014
Kong_ wrote:
Since you -- or anyone, for that matter -- have yet to present evidence of the supernatural,
I already posted the evidence. Did watch the 14 minute documentary?

Since: Feb 14

Location hidden

#10 Aug 14, 2014
Kong_ wrote:
AND since we're discussing BIOLOGICAL evolution here, this entire thread is pointless.
You're just saying that you insist on closing your eyes to a rational argument.

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#11 Aug 14, 2014
Zog Has-fallen wrote:
<quoted text>
You forget: I accept biological change over time. My argument is that if Darwinism is correct, then all the logical implications of Darwinism are valid. One significant logical implication of Darwinism, if you care to face it, is that Darwinists are Satanists.
Incorrect.

"Social Darwinism" was loosely based upon a misunderstanding of 'survival of the fittest', and perverted that concept to include ARTIFICIAL selection (aka: "eugenics", "master race", etc).

The concept was NEVER accepted by mainstream science, especially Biologists.
Your logic is not valid.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#12 Aug 14, 2014
Zog Has-fallen wrote:
<quoted text>
You forget: I accept biological change over time. My argument is that if Darwinism is correct, then all the logical implications of Darwinism are valid. One significant logical implication of Darwinism, if you care to face it, is that Darwinists are Satanists.
Actually one logical implication of fundamentalist creationism (like your own theology for example) is that God is a Satanist.

“Dinosaurs survived the flood!”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

Jesus probably rode dinosaurs!

#13 Aug 14, 2014
Zog Has-fallen wrote:
<quoted text>
You forget: I accept biological change over time. My argument is that if Darwinism is correct, then all the logical implications of Darwinism are valid. One significant logical implication of Darwinism, if you care to face it, is that Darwinists are Satanists.
I think that you serve Satan more than anyone on this forum. I suppose everyone has to be good at something.

“Dinosaurs survived the flood!”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

Jesus probably rode dinosaurs!

#14 Aug 14, 2014
Zog Has-fallen wrote:
<quoted text> You're just saying that you insist on closing your eyes to a rational argument.
While your eyes never opened to rational argument.

Aren't you a mathematician? Why do you even need to bother arguing when you believe you know everything already?

Since: Feb 14

Location hidden

#15 Aug 14, 2014
Kong_ wrote:
Incorrect.
"Social Darwinism" was loosely based upon a misunderstanding of 'survival of the fittest', and perverted that concept to include ARTIFICIAL selection (aka: "eugenics", "master race", etc).
The concept was NEVER accepted by mainstream science, especially Biologists.
Your logic is not valid.
No. Your logic isn't valid. You appeal to the fact that the majority of biologists don't want to confess to being Satanists. Your argument is just plain silly. What percentage of war criminals have confessed to being war criminals?

Since: Feb 14

Location hidden

#16 Aug 14, 2014
It only seems reasonable that no Darwinist wants to examine persuasive evidence that he or she is a Satanist. So check out this amusing Onion video that makes fun of your willful blindness:

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#17 Aug 14, 2014
Zog Has-fallen wrote:
<quoted text> You appeal to the fact that the majority of biologists don't want to confess to being Satanists. Your argument is just plain silly.
LOL....*MY* argument is 'just plain silly'?

Wow.

Since: Feb 14

Location hidden

#18 Aug 14, 2014
So none of you are willing to face the implications of what you believe in a damning 14 minute video?

“Dinosaurs survived the flood!”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

Jesus probably rode dinosaurs!

#19 Aug 14, 2014
Zog Has-fallen wrote:
So none of you are willing to face the implications of what you believe in a damning 14 minute video?
It's like this Satan, we aren't falling for you elaborate lies.

How can someone as evil as you are be trusted?

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#20 Aug 14, 2014
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>It's like this Satan, we aren't falling for you elaborate lies.

How can someone as evil as you are be trusted?
Yeah...well that and I really dont believe in the voices in Shoob's head.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 40
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 13 min Blitzking 199,567
News It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09) 18 min Chimney1 151,390
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 34 min Chimney1 35,733
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 4 hr ATHEOI 15,031
Complex Systems May Evolve More Slowly - Calcul... Thu Creationtruth 3
Evolution is merely a subroutine Thu Creationtruth 1
My Story Part 1 Thu Regolith Based Li... 3
More from around the web