again you are a lying jack wagon. i did not use that word and still haven't.<quoted text>
One more time you complete and utter moron, you wanted a working definition of "kind". I gave you one. I succeeded since my definition works.
And you are the idiot that first used the word. That is why I challenge your idiocy.
How hard to you need to beaten with your own stupidity before you see your error?
I replied to your post of ""Evolution says that kind gives rise to the the same kind. They have a working definition of kind. Creationists don't."
You were responding to free servant with that post.