So a book known to be a confirmed, unreliable source and your forced misunderstanding of the facts regarding two meteor craters. It is essentially the same thing as saying you have nothing.<quoted text>
The combinatin of the Bible flood record, and the Pingualuit and Berringer craters data are a good start.
I can dismiss the Bible as a source of scientific data because it has not only not been confirmed as one, but the opposite has been shown. You have not shown that there is any evidence from the craters that confirms that they contain evidence of a global flood.