It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution debate

Full story: Asheville Citizen-Times

I would like to respond to the letter 'Recent letter offered no examples of Darwinian disingenuousness,' . He responds to an article with, 'He says evolution is 'so riddled with holes,' yet fails to provide a ...

Comments (Page 5,619)

Showing posts 112,361 - 112,380 of127,051
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

Level 5

Since: Apr 12

Zhengzhou, China

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#114421
Apr 27, 2013
 
Kitten Koder wrote, "A negative cannot be proven."

That depends.
If a claim is made regarding something invisible, it can't be disproven.
That's how Carl Sagan got by with claiming that there was an invisible dragon in his garage.
On the other thread, one of the Creationists challenged the Evolutionists to prove that God doesn't exist.
I guess we can't, since God is invisible.

Also, if a claim is not confined to a particular place, it would be difficult to disprove.
In order to prove that there are no werewolves or vampires, one would have to explore the entire world.

However, a claim might be disproven if it involves the visible and is limited to a particular place.
One could go to the peak of Mount Olympus to find out if the Greek gods live there.
One could also go to the North Pole to find out if Santa Claus lives there.

“What, me worry?”

Since: Mar 09

I'm a racist caricature!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#114422
Apr 27, 2013
 
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
"The more educated you are about something" reflects greater knowledge/understanding of the thing. "the less you realize you know about it" reflects lower realization of what you know about it, even tho the first phrase acknowledges realization of more. The two notions are mutually exclusive.
No. You are such a fantastic example of it, it would be comical if it weren't so pathetic.

“What, me worry?”

Since: Mar 09

I'm a racist caricature!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#114423
Apr 27, 2013
 
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
You're entitled to your opinion.
So, you admit that you're just asserting opinion, not objective facts. You're so pointless. Spheres aren't as pointless as you are.

“What, me worry?”

Since: Mar 09

I'm a racist caricature!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#114424
Apr 27, 2013
 
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
I do not hold science to an unrealistic standard of absolute certainty. I also don't raise science above where it is. You do.
Sure you do. You ask for conclusive evidence. Why do you lie?
KAB

Oxford, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#114425
Apr 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
A negative cannot be proven.
That's interesting since I just proved one.
KAB

Oxford, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#114426
Apr 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Thomas Robertson wrote:
<quoted text>
A good search term on this would be "Dunning-Kruger effect."
Except that what was stated is not the Dunning-Kruger effect. It is instead a statement the two parts of which directly contradict each other. So it may have been stated by someone suffering from DK.
KAB

Oxford, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#114427
Apr 27, 2013
 
Thomas Robertson wrote:
Kitten Koder wrote, "A negative cannot be proven."
That depends.
If a claim is made regarding something invisible, it can't be disproven.
That's how Carl Sagan got by with claiming that there was an invisible dragon in his garage.
On the other thread, one of the Creationists challenged the Evolutionists to prove that God doesn't exist.
I guess we can't, since God is invisible.
Also, if a claim is not confined to a particular place, it would be difficult to disprove.
In order to prove that there are no werewolves or vampires, one would have to explore the entire world.
However, a claim might be disproven if it involves the visible and is limited to a particular place.
One could go to the peak of Mount Olympus to find out if the Greek gods live there.
One could also go to the North Pole to find out if Santa Claus lives there.
Thanks TR. I hope Kitten will give you a hearing ear, or would that be seeing eye considering the nature of this forum? Refusal to accept truth from an opponent is a significant impediment to progress.
KAB

Oxford, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#114428
Apr 27, 2013
 
LowellGuy wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure you do. You ask for conclusive evidence. Why do you lie?
Can something be established as conclusive without conclusive evidence?
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#114429
Apr 27, 2013
 
Oh Markie, where art thou?

“See how you are?”

Level 5

Since: Jul 12

Earth

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#114430
Apr 27, 2013
 
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
Can something be established as conclusive without conclusive evidence?
Not only do you, you claim do so DESPITE conclusive evidence. For starters, there is your statement, "the Bible is a demonstrably reliable source," which is just the tip of the cellophane iceberg you seem to fantasize as "Truth."
KAB

Oxford, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#114431
Apr 27, 2013
 
ChromiuMan wrote:
<quoted text>
Not only do you, you claim do so DESPITE conclusive evidence. For starters, there is your statement, "the Bible is a demonstrably reliable source," which is just the tip of the cellophane iceberg you seem to fantasize as "Truth."
Why don't you just demonstrate the Bible is unreliable. Oh, that's right. That would require confirming data, and all you provide are unconfirmed assertions. I realize that's so much easier, but alas, worthless.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#114432
Apr 27, 2013
 
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
Why don't you just demonstrate the Bible is unreliable. Oh, that's right. That would require confirming data, and all you provide are unconfirmed assertions. I realize that's so much easier, but alas, worthless.
How do you want the Bible invalidated?

What would it take for the Bible to be shown to be wrong for you?
KAB

Oxford, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#114433
Apr 27, 2013
 
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
How do you want the Bible invalidated?
What would it take for the Bible to be shown to be wrong for you?
For something stated in the Bible, provide conclusive data confirming that there is no linguistically, grammatically, and contextually valid possible understanding which could be correct.

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#114434
Apr 27, 2013
 
Thomas Robertson wrote:
Kitten Koder wrote, "A negative cannot be proven."
That depends.
If a claim is made regarding something invisible, it can't be disproven.
That's how Carl Sagan got by with claiming that there was an invisible dragon in his garage.
On the other thread, one of the Creationists challenged the Evolutionists to prove that God doesn't exist.
I guess we can't, since God is invisible.
Also, if a claim is not confined to a particular place, it would be difficult to disprove.
In order to prove that there are no werewolves or vampires, one would have to explore the entire world.
However, a claim might be disproven if it involves the visible and is limited to a particular place.
One could go to the peak of Mount Olympus to find out if the Greek gods live there.
One could also go to the North Pole to find out if Santa Claus lives there.
Asking for evidence that something never happens is an impossibility, it cannot be done, because a lack of evidence is essentially meaning it never happens. However, since nothing can be proven with 100% certainty, no matter what it is, a negative cannot be proven, an assertion that depends on an absence of evidence cannot be proven. Not to mention, what he pulled is a red herring anyway, and has nothing to do with what I had originally stated.

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#114435
Apr 27, 2013
 
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
That's interesting since I just proved one.
No you have not.

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#114436
Apr 27, 2013
 
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks TR. I hope Kitten will give you a hearing ear, or would that be seeing eye considering the nature of this forum? Refusal to accept truth from an opponent is a significant impediment to progress.
Thomas is intelligent, but even intelligent people are wrong, and in this case he was not correct. What you asked is basically the equivalent of asking to prove that rain never falls indoors.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#114437
Apr 27, 2013
 
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
For something stated in the Bible, provide conclusive data confirming that there is no linguistically, grammatically, and contextually valid possible understanding which could be correct.
Sorry, that is ridiculously vague. Using that standard you could claim that any religion is "true".

Your test fails. Try again.

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#114438
Apr 27, 2013
 
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
Hasn't the non-biblical historian "scraped bare" testimony data already been provided, I think even by your side?

DODGE.

A dodge is a DISHONEST (AKA a lie) attempt to avoid the issue.

And no.


To refresh your memory.


1. The "Prophecy" was made AFTER the city was seized by Nebby.

2. Lest go verse by verse

26:1 - When the prophecy was given. Note that it is AFTER the actual attack by Nebbys troops.

26:2 - Why

27:3 - God is ticked

27:4 - Failed. Never happened.

27:5 - Failed. Island still exists.

27:6 - Check ..... actually happened.

26:7 Check.... actually happened.

26:8 Check

26:9 Failed. He never destroyed the walls to the city nor the towers of the city. The little village towns were sacked, but these have been described as "suburbs". These were lower class workers. They provided food and supplies to the gentry that lived in the city.

26:10 Failed. Nebby failed to enter the city abet not without trying. Tyre agreed to pay tribute and probably only did that because their supplies were cut off.

26:11 Probably failed. This again seems to be referring to the City, not the surrounding village.

26:12 Epic Fail. The wealth, the walls, the fine houses were all on in the island city where Nebby never entered.

26:13 Cannot be determined. Maybe they had to pay the harps as part of the tribute. Most likely another failure.

26:14 Grand Imperial Pooh Bah of failures.

26:15 - 26:18 Also seems clear enough who is being talked about,... again; "men of the sea"

26:19 Complete, utter and total failure. Tyre is still above water. In fact it is larger now than in Phonetician times.

26:20 Failed.

26:21 Epic failure. We know where it is and it is still inhabited.

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#114439
Apr 27, 2013
 
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
As you indicated, you have no evidence.

As you implied, you have no evidence.

Again, you lost because:

You don't have any archeological, historic, or genetic evidence of that either.

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#114440
Apr 27, 2013
 
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
I await confirmation that it was rebuilt as an island city. I know that likely won't come from you.

As I already provided it, as have multiple others, this is, effectively, another LIE.

You lie with the authority of the author (alt: Father) of all lies.

Satan is your master.

Do you Satanists really have to kiss his butt? Isn't that where the expression came from?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 112,361 - 112,380 of127,051
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••