It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution debate

I would like to respond to the letter 'Recent letter offered no examples of Darwinian disingenuousness,' . He responds to an article with, 'He says evolution is 'so riddled with holes,' yet fails to provide a ... Full Story

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#114195 Apr 24, 2013
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
I didn't realize that bones only have to be declared human but must be proven otherwise. How much more objective can you get than that?!

I am not responsible for what you don't know. Anthropologists and other forensic specialists determine what types of bones they are. They have determined that we have bones (sic) and of what type they are. This has been done.

Objectivity is dealing fairly with the data. Your choice to ignore the data is driven by the fact that you cannot deal with it. Yours is not objective. It is denialism.

KAB

United States

#114196 Apr 24, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
Here is an article on it:
http://errancy.org/egypt.html
There are countless others. This site links this as a minor error and the failed Tyre prophesy as a major one.
As your reference notes, there's no confirmation it didn't happen.
KAB

United States

#114197 Apr 24, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
What do you mean?
In the case of the Tyre prophesy I have hit it out of the park.
If you read the prophesy the "Tyre" they are talking about is the island city. It is not my opinion that Nebuchadnezzar failed, it is a historical fact. That was the prophecy.
Worse yet, people live on an island that has been rebuilt several times today. It is not a barren rock in the middle of the sea where fishermen dry their nets.
I have provided evidence for this time and time again. Do you want to get your butt reamed out by the facts again?
Ream all you want with facts like it's an island today. It's an immense aid to reinforcing your ignorance. BTW, the detailed (i.e., non-red-car) prophecy is instrumental regarding this matter.
KAB

United States

#114198 Apr 24, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
Probably all of them.
What exactly do you propose?
Tremendously increased volume/depth of water in areas which were already covered by water, with much less pressure on areas initially not covered. Try squeezing a rubber ball with spread fingers. What happens between the fingers?

“What, me worry?”

Since: Mar 09

I'm a racist caricature!

#114199 Apr 24, 2013
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
Tremendously increased volume/depth of water in areas which were already covered by water, with much less pressure on areas initially not covered. Try squeezing a rubber ball with spread fingers. What happens between the fingers?
Why do you think that's in any way an accurate analogy?
KAB

United States

#114200 Apr 24, 2013
LowellGuy wrote:
<quoted text>
If you want Noah's flood to be true you do.
I await confirming data.
KAB

United States

#114201 Apr 24, 2013
LowellGuy wrote:
<quoted text>
So, only that which "harmonizes" with the flood story is confirmed, and all that refutes it is not confirmed.
Again, how is that not exactly confirmation bias?
No matter how you re-word it, that's what you do.
Your words, not mine.
KAB

United States

#114202 Apr 24, 2013
MikeF wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow. You really ARE delusional.
You have NOT identified data which harmonizes with the global flood. All you've done is cite examples of locals flood while ignoring absolute proof that a global flood never occurred. The really sad part is you still believe you're right.
Sadly, don't you believe you're right?
KAB

United States

#114203 Apr 24, 2013
Salma Ahmed wrote:
However, the author of "It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution debate" is also very lacking in knowledge. He evidently has following anything in paleoanthropology. We have dozens of species tying modern humans to our common ancestor with the other apes. There are fossils from 1000's of individuals making up this fossil record. Yet he claims there is no evidence.
He also shows a distinct lack of knowledge of the workings of the scientific method. Historical sciences, such as paleoanthropology, work in a very different fashion than he seems to think. Direct experimentation is not possible, but predictions and repeatable observations are.
So provide some data instead of just running off at the keyboard.
KAB

United States

#114204 Apr 24, 2013
MikeF wrote:
<quoted text>
I just told you. Old Tyre (Palaetyrus) was a name the Greeks later gave it.
You telling me something is worthless. You are not a demonstrated reliable source. Provide data confirming the answer to my question.
KAB

United States

#114205 Apr 24, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
In your reference I found no answer to the question of what the city opposite island Tyre was known as when Nebuchadnezzar arrived. Your reference did note that Tyre may have originated on the mainland.

“What, me worry?”

Since: Mar 09

I'm a racist caricature!

#114206 Apr 24, 2013
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
I await confirming data.
Pretending it hasn't been explained to you in the past doesn't negate that reality. That's just you lying.

“What, me worry?”

Since: Mar 09

I'm a racist caricature!

#114207 Apr 24, 2013
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
Your words, not mine.
So, you think there IS evidence that refutes the Bible flood? REALLY? Name it. Or, admit that I accurately portrayed your attitude toward the evidence and your blatant confirmation bias.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Indianapolis, IN

#114208 Apr 24, 2013
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
Ream all you want with facts like it's an island today. It's an immense aid to reinforcing your ignorance. BTW, the detailed (i.e., non-red-car) prophecy is instrumental regarding this matter.
No one has claimed it's an island today, you arrogant ass.

You're wrong.
You're nuts.
You're a bore.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Indianapolis, IN

#114209 Apr 24, 2013
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
Sadly, don't you believe you're right?
I *know* I'm right. Sadly, you think you're right but you're merely delusional.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Indianapolis, IN

#114210 Apr 24, 2013
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
You telling me something is worthless.

Speaking of worthless, how are you doing today?

[QUOTE who="KAB"]You are not a demonstrated reliable source.
I am.
KAB wrote:
Provide data confirming the answer to my question.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ushu#References

Suck it.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Indianapolis, IN

#114211 Apr 24, 2013
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
So provide some data instead of just running off at the keyboard.
r

Don't waste you time, Salma. KAB doesn't really want data. He just wants to stick his fingers in his ears and yell "La-la-la-la". Like he always does.

How's things in Egypt? Been a long while since I was there.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Indianapolis, IN

#114212 Apr 24, 2013
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
In your reference I found no answer to the question of what the city opposite island Tyre was known as when Nebuchadnezzar arrived. Your reference did note that Tyre may have originated on the mainland.
So what? Do you really think that changes the fact that it was the island city that was attacked. A piss poor attempt at misdirection on your part.

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#114213 Apr 24, 2013
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
As your reference notes, there's no confirmation it didn't happen.

This is delusional.

Mt.15:21,
Mk.7:24 & 31
Acts 21:3

Furthermore:

19 Therefore this is what the Sovereign Lord says: I am going to give Egypt to Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon, and he will carry off its wealth. He will loot and plunder the land as pay for his army. 20 I have given him Egypt as a reward for his efforts because he and his army did it for me, declares the Sovereign Lord.

Humm.... interesting, but it never happened.

Just like Nebby failed agains Tyre, he also failed against Egypt.

Poor prophecy.

Even worse history.

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#114214 Apr 24, 2013
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
Ream all you want with facts like it's an island today. It's an immense aid to reinforcing your ignorance. BTW, the detailed (i.e., non-red-car) prophecy is instrumental regarding this matter.

Since the details are 'the "prophecy" failed in every way' I would say that is an instrumental failure on your part.

Seem like Ezekiel was nearly as poor at prophecy as the modern day watchtower cult. Now what did the bible say about false prophets?


Isaiah 44:25
Jeremiah 14:14 !!!
Jeremiah 23:16
Jeremiah 50:36
Lamentations 2:14
Ezekiel 13:1 & 9(irony noted)
Ezekiel 22:28
Hosea 11:6
Matthew 7:15
Matthew 24:11 & 24
Mark 13:22
2 Peter 2:1 (ouch!)
1 John 4:1

Speaking of false prophets....

http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/False%20Religi...

Notice the (Masonic) CROSS?

Notice the same symbol here
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/False%20Religi...

Notice the building in the background? It is a masonic temple.

Do you know who is buried in the pyramid with the masonic cross on it?

Chucky Taze Russell. A 33 degree mason.

Humm.... does your cult not condemn freemasonry?

Do they not also deny that Russell was a mason?

Does his tomb not also have a Knights Templar inscription on it?

Do you want to walk with me through the contorted web of Watchtower denials about CTR's membership in the Masons (and occult groups).

Do you know where Russell got money to start his religious order?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 13 min Igor Trip 142,708
"Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 34 min One way or another 14,652
An atheistic view on evolution vs. a godly view... 10 hr The Dude 952
Why natural selection can't work 10 hr The Dude 27
Last ditch bid to ban creationism in Scottish c... 16 hr paul porter 3
Why Are There No Transitional Animals Today? (Mar '09) Wed karl44 796
Stephen King: Universe 'Suggests Intelligent De... (May '13) Wed Kong_ 455
More from around the web