It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution debate

I would like to respond to the letter 'Recent letter offered no examples of Darwinian disingenuousness,' . He responds to an article with, 'He says evolution is 'so riddled with holes,' yet fails to provide a ... Read more

Level 6

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

#113052 Mar 28, 2013
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
What's not to like? You provide no data to be examined/scrutinized, only assertions. That doesn't meet the slam-dunk criteria. Scientifically, data is necessary if you want to be taken seriously. A single specific example which withstands scrutiny will suffice.
OMG.
There is more data about the fossil record, the nested hierarchy of ERVs, pseudogenes, and ubiquitous proteins, than you could read in 10 years. You have been pointed to so much of it already that you will forgive me if I just post the conclusions in a single topix post.
Go look it up for yourself, doofus. You have no idea.

“What, me worry?”

Since: Mar 09

I'm a racist caricature!

#113053 Mar 28, 2013
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
So it's an absolute certainty that Earth is not cubic in shape.
Nope.

Nothing in science is 100% certain.

Not even that.

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#113054 Mar 29, 2013
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
No, the data does.
But you are measuring the data's validity only on it's popularity. So, to you, reality is decided by popular opinion.

“See how you are?”

Level 5

Since: Jul 12

Earth

#113055 Mar 29, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
But you are measuring the data's validity only on it's popularity. So, to you, reality is decided by popular opinion.
Only after the current Governing Body tells him what the approved popular opinion is at the moment.
KAB

Oxford, NC

#113056 Mar 29, 2013
LowellGuy wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope.
Nothing in science is 100% certain.
Not even that.
You may enjoy this article, as I did.

http://michigantoday.umich.edu/2007/Sep/sci_m...

Here are two quotes from it,

"Scientists talk a lot about facts, about things that we know are true. And it's true that most of what we know is so well established as to be beyond doubt. Dinosaurs once walked the Earth. Lightning is an electrical discharge. Continents drift. These things are true, part of reality."

"No scientific conclusion is ever completely final; everything is open to revision."

It appears that at least some scientists speak with forked mind. I know you don't have that problem with regard to this matter.
KAB

Oxford, NC

#113057 Mar 29, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
But you are measuring the data's validity only on it's popularity. So, to you, reality is decided by popular opinion.
No, I'm not.

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#113058 Mar 29, 2013
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
You may enjoy this article, as I did.
http://michigantoday.umich.edu/2007/Sep/sci_m...
Here are two quotes from it,
"Scientists talk a lot about facts, about things that we know are true. And it's true that most of what we know is so well established as to be beyond doubt. Dinosaurs once walked the Earth. Lightning is an electrical discharge. Continents drift. These things are true, part of reality."
"No scientific conclusion is ever completely final; everything is open to revision."
It appears that at least some scientists speak with forked mind. I know you don't have that problem with regard to this matter.

Both statements are absolutely correct. If you don't understand then you don't understand science. Not a huge shock to the rest of us.

They are also exactly what we have been trying to tell you for some time.


“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#113059 Mar 29, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
But you are measuring the data's validity only on it's popularity. So, to you, reality is decided by popular opinion.

KAB is only interested in the popular opinion of his overlords.

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#113060 Mar 29, 2013
ChromiuMan wrote:
<quoted text>
Only after the current Governing Body tells him what the approved popular opinion is at the moment.

i was talking over dinner with my nephew who is a graduate student in theology about the JWs, as well as other issues. He thinks they are even crazier than I do. He was telling me about some of the other things they make up as they go along.

One JW family apparently disowned their 5 year old son after he received a life saving blood transfusion after a car accident.

That was probably the LEAST crazy thing he told me about them. I am saving the good stuff for KAB. I just love it when he squirms.

Have you seen him answer any of my questions about his JW cult lately?

Me neither.

He has got to be the worst "witness" for "Jehovah" EVER.

KAB

Oxford, NC

#113061 Mar 29, 2013
Dogen wrote:
<quoted text>
Both statements are absolutely correct. If you don't understand then you don't understand science. Not a huge shock to the rest of us.
They are also exactly what we have been trying to tell you for some time.
Since you understand it, then certainly you can explain the harmony in the following:

"These things are true, part of reality."
and
"No scientific conclusion is ever completely final."

BTW, the expression "absolutely correct" is that as in "a certainty"?
LowellGuy

Lowell, MA

#113062 Mar 29, 2013
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
You may enjoy this article, as I did.
http://michigantoday.umich.edu/2007/Sep/sci_m...
Here are two quotes from it,
"Scientists talk a lot about facts, about things that we know are true. And it's true that most of what we know is so well established as to be beyond doubt. Dinosaurs once walked the Earth. Lightning is an electrical discharge. Continents drift. These things are true, part of reality."
"No scientific conclusion is ever completely final; everything is open to revision."
It appears that at least some scientists speak with forked mind. I know you don't have that problem with regard to this matter.
As to be beyond doubt. We can be without doubt yet still be convinced by evidence to the contrary. Clearly you don't understand what "doubt" means.

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#113063 Mar 29, 2013
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
Since you understand it, then certainly you can explain the harmony in the following:
"These things are true, part of reality."
and
"No scientific conclusion is ever completely final."
BTW, the expression "absolutely correct" is that as in "a certainty"?

The first statement is common vernacular, the second is scientific.



For example is evolution a fact or a theory?

Answer: Yes!

In the "real world" we accept certain things as facts.

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#113064 Mar 29, 2013
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
BTW, the expression "absolutely correct" is that as in "a certainty"?

Yes. When speaking and thinking in those terms.

But not in science.
KAB

Oxford, NC

#113065 Mar 29, 2013
LowellGuy wrote:
<quoted text>
As to be beyond doubt. We can be without doubt yet still be convinced by evidence to the contrary. Clearly you don't understand what "doubt" means.
I understand that, since doubt is uncertainty, to be without doubt about something, and yet acknowledge it may not be so, is to falsify the lack of doubt. That's not to take anything away from your keen ability to do just that.
KAB

Oxford, NC

#113066 Mar 29, 2013
Dogen wrote:
<quoted text>
The first statement is common vernacular, the second is scientific.
For example is evolution a fact or a theory?
Answer: Yes!
In the "real world" we accept certain things as facts.
Do you accept as fact Earth not being cubic in shape?
KAB

Oxford, NC

#113067 Mar 29, 2013
Dogen wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes. When speaking and thinking in those terms.
But not in science.
In this case I side with the scientists' position that there are certain things which are beyond doubt (i.e., we know for certain what the reality is). Earth not being cubic in shape is one of them.

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#113068 Mar 29, 2013
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you accept as fact Earth not being cubic in shape?
Speaking in general or scientifically?

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#113069 Mar 29, 2013
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
In this case I side with the scientists' position that there are certain things which are beyond doubt (i.e., we know for certain what the reality is). Earth not being cubic in shape is one of them.

That is a general proposition. Not a scientific one.

When are you going to answer my questions about your cult and why they tell lies?

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#113070 Mar 29, 2013
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you accept as fact Earth not being cubic in shape?
That is not what the fact is. A fact is not a negative but a positive, thus, the fact is not that the Earth is not cubic, but that the Earth is a lopsided spheroid.

“What, me worry?”

Since: Mar 09

I'm a racist caricature!

#113071 Mar 30, 2013
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
I understand that, since doubt is uncertainty, to be without doubt about something, and yet acknowledge it may not be so, is to falsify the lack of doubt. That's not to take anything away from your keen ability to do just that.
I don't doubt that OJ Simpson killed two people, because the evidence is so damning. However, if a video were presented that shows Ron and Nicole being slain by someone else, I would be convinced that he didn't. I accept the evidence as valid, find it compelling, and have been convinced of his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Is it still conceivable that he could be innocent? Yes, through an amazing series of coincidences and improbabilities. But, that doesn't mean I doubt his guilt. It could have been unicorns and leprechauns that did it. Doubt and certainty aren't perfect antonyms, though colloquially they may seem to be.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 2 min DanFromSmithville 155,148
News Should evolution be taught in high school? (Feb '08) 32 min MikeF 178,177
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 34 min MikeF 18,023
News Darwin on the rocks (Sep '14) 6 hr Paul Porter1 947
Are Asians/whites more evolved? (Sep '07) Mar 26 Dogen 1,714
News Another Successful Prediction of Intelligent De... Mar 26 MikeF 1
News Intelligent Design: Corey Lee Mar 25 Paul Porter1 1
More from around the web