You provided a reference to a sizable body of info. I showed that the first item was erroneous, thus not warranting further consideration until you identify specific wheat among the chaff.<quoted text>
I provided the data. You ignored it.
I provided evidence of what biblical scholars say about it AND WHY.
You ignored it.
I provided examples of specific verses that were mistranslated (for the apparent goal of promoting the Watchtower cult).
Now YOU need to provide the evidence that the JW "bible" (falsely so called) should not be distributed as low grade toilet paper to low income families. At least in that capacity it may serve some greater good.
The opinions of scholars, especially those pre-biased for one side, are not the data.
You have not provided data demonstrating mistranslation. You have just provided alternative translations and asserted that NWT renderings are mistranslations.
Your final comment is characteristic of the quality of data you have provided thusfar. Typical Dr. D.
Try providing one specific verse and a detailed analysis and explanation of the mistranslation. At this point I doubt you're capable.