Love too!!Shall we discuss Marksmanís Ten Commandments?
I can tie it in. In order to have biological evolution, must a body experience chemical evolution? Also Bicycle mechanics and basket weaving is observable. The origin of life and human from non-human evolution are not observable, thus failing the scientific method.1.[always avoid] the origin of life.
Also avoid basket weaving, bicycle mechanics, or any other irrelevant topicóunless you can tie it in.
It most certainly is true. It's called chemical evolution.2...don't admit that evolution is indeed a part of the origin of life.
Donít admit that, because itís not true.
Just abput every post I've made in 3 years!!!3...always say your opponent doesn't grasp science, when they demand you adhere to the scientific method.
Iím at loss on this one.
When did a Creationist ever demand that an Evolutionist adhere to the scientific method?
Not with me. I'm honest and admit matters of faith, unlike you guys.Iíve only seen it happen the other way around.
No we are not. Michael Behe's concept is irreducible complexity, and is a valid concept.4...avoid attempts to explain extreme complexity unless your opponent is uneducated about the scientific method. Then befuddle them with fantasies.
Weíre talking about Michael Beheís arguments here, are we?
Then you lose!I admit, they get rather complicated.
But Iím not going to cut and paste just because my opponent does.
Again I can tie it in. THe anthropic Principle says that the big bang occured in the such a razor thin peramiter that it appears it was designed to support the life that was going to be placed within it. If you are an atheist, it is a stong argument that the universe was designed, and knew we were coming!!5....avoid the anthropic principle, if you are atheist.
I agree. Also, avoid the anthropic principle if youríe NOT an atheist.
Also, avoid basket weaving, bicycle mechanics, or another irrelevant topicóunless you can tie it in.