When you make a claim for which there is no evidence, that argument is rightly rejected. It doesn't matter what that claim is. We accept arguments for which there is evidence. Without evidence, you're just making shit up. When you stop making shit up and start presenting evidence, we'll stop rejecting your claims.<quoted text>No, you are wrong because you are not honest. An agnostic would be open to both sides. You never accept an argument that is procreation, and you are always on the attack of creationists. You dishonestly claim ignorance, while obviously having a bias to one side. That is weak and noncommital.
Listen, if you reject GOD, have the balls to be an atheist, and accept the consequences, if any, for your decision. You might as well, because if you are wrong, and the bible is true, your fate as an agnostic is the same as an atheist. You are dishonest because you label yourself as neutral, but your replies reflect otherwise.
That doesn't mean we're saying you're wrong; it means we're saying you haven't demonstrated in any way that you're right. Until you can do that, we are correct in not accepting your claims. Bitching about us having critical thinking skills isn't exactly helping your case.