The flood. You admitted there is no evidence that supports it, and you admitted that, other than your Bible, there is no reason to suppose such a thing ever happened.<quoted text>
Whatever means used to determine fact from fiction will be a science in itself as it relates to "... reliable knowledge about a topic" ( wikipedia.com ).
So to the degree that religious concepts can be used or spiritual methods employed in determining fact from fiction, they will be scientific efforts.
But where is the claim that I have accepted without evidence to support them?
Was that too obvious?