I is NOT a misunderstanding to state that research highlighted a DETERIORATING genome.<quoted text>
No, we have falsified your misunderstanding of it. There was no evolutionist claim of a deteriorating genome. You have a tendency to read articles and misinterpreting them. Take the article that you thought debunked the population bottleneck and yet did nothing of the sort.
And no, you repeatedly post articles that you do not understand. Answers may be slow in coming because it takes us a while to understand where the hell your deranged brain went off the track.
Lastly, you have not posted one article that shows that researchers are idiots. You have shown yourself to be one many times over.
Now you can struggle, offer your apologies with 'likely', suggest I can't read English any better than you and still the results will say the same thing.
AND more importantly this data, without the hubris to explain it in evolutionary terms and turn evidence for creation into an evolutionary mystery of liklihood , actually supports a creationist paradigm better than an evolutionary one. Would you guys not have loved for your research to demonstrate the genome was coping well in expelling deleterious mutations? Well it isn't Too bad for you evos, as usual.