"Yes, it is not..."<quoted text>
Yes, it is not necessary for you to understand evolution to live, make money, etc.. But it you want to try to debunk it you have to understand it. Clearly you don't. Most of your posts are gibberish, bad analogies, and a total misunderstanding of the theory.
In other words if this were a formal debate you would be losing. Of course your side has been losing this debate for 150 years now. Luckily for science, and for the world, we do accept the theory of evolution.
By the way, I should take back part of my post. If you have had a flu shot, or any antibiotics recently then you have relied upon the theory of evolution to live. If you drive a car you have used the theory of evolution to get from one place to another since paleontology needs evolution to explain it and a knowledge of paleontology is needed to find oil you are using the theory whether you like it or not.
And you claim to be rational/logical? Get a grip. Cant you see your thought process is flawed to the core?
I understand perfectly well. Anyone who doesn't share your beliefs is lacking in understanding.
I dont need oil. Oil companies need oil to get rich off idiots who dont see that solar technology is more appropriate.
Paleontology is not NEEDED to find oil. Was the first discovery of oil made possible by Paleontology?
After examining the nature of the layers of rock that oil is found in one place; does it take a genius to deduce that similar layers of rocks may contain the same entities or substance?
BTW, do the Arabs use Paleontology to find oil gushing up into their back yards?