It appears that bones in the human wrist also presented a fact that humans had a knuckle walking ancestry. On the back of one single fossil this 'fact',that was supported by the majority of the scientific community were wrong and this 'evidence' never was evidence at all.
In fact it was a very clever guess for an ancient bible writer to have knowledge that indeed we are made from the elements of dirt. It appears Moses had some insight into this fact before modern science.
Homology, be it morphological or genetic, is no more than a game of pick a suite of traits that suit and ignore anything that doesn't. Instead give any anomoly a name like convergent evolution, homoplasy, deletion, insertion, recombination, duplication and call that assumptive reasoning, evidence.
Mankind is a primate which is distinguished from any other primate by the fact that mankind is a furless obligate biped, that has the ability to make meaning of the world through higher reasoning ability, abstract thought and sophisticated language. Mankind has shorter telomeres than any other non human primate. It is easy to distinguish man from other apes if one truly wishes to, but evos do not.
What it all means is that chimps, as well as any other primate, and humans are not as alike as some would like us all to think.
The other sad fact is that any child can separate a human being out from a bunch of apes, in pick the odd one out. Unfortunately, adult evolutionists, be they theist or not or scientists or not, are often unable to perform this simple task. This may seen as evidence of the extreme inculcation evolutionists undergo to maintain mankind is nothing more than another evolved ape.
This looks like a summary of a lot of (poor) creationist arguments.
Which of the above nonsense do you really think might hold water. Point it out and I will refute it specifically.