I didn't ignore the statement, rather I saw that it too was only a hope. You "scientific" sticklers have not tended to give much weight to hopes.
Ah, going after the low hanging fruit in the intro and ignoring the uncomfortable main act.
Can you address the CONTENT of TB's post?
Tangled Bank wrote:
"The wet/dry time resolution was sufficient to see that there was no "common wet period" throughout the entire holocene.
No global flood data
No global flood"