It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution debate

Full story: Asheville Citizen-Times

I would like to respond to the letter 'Recent letter offered no examples of Darwinian disingenuousness,' . He responds to an article with, 'He says evolution is 'so riddled with holes,' yet fails to provide a ...

Comments (Page 2,562)

Showing posts 51,221 - 51,240 of132,982
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“What, me worry?”

Since: Mar 09

I'm a racist caricature!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#51880
Jan 14, 2011
 
truth teller wrote:
<quoted text> Yes but where are all of the transition fossils Darwin theorized that would be in existance but never found. Maybe he was wrong, maybe you're wrong. Heaven forbid ( excuse me) that's only if you believe in Heaven, right?
Museums have a small percentage of those transitional fossils on display, and the rest are in the basement being stored and/or studied by the museums and universities around the world. What is it you think museums do?
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#51881
Jan 14, 2011
 
MikeF wrote:
<quoted text>
HEY!
Sorry.

:-/

“What, me worry?”

Since: Mar 09

I'm a racist caricature!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#51882
Jan 14, 2011
 

“What, me worry?”

Since: Mar 09

I'm a racist caricature!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#51883
Jan 14, 2011
 
truth teller wrote:
<quoted text>My point is that with evolution another theory explains a theory
Wrong. The theory of evolution explains the diversity of life on Earth. There is no other theory involved.

Why don't you tell us exactly what you think the theory of evolution is. I can guarantee that whatever you think it is, you're wrong.
truth teller wrote:
I believe God created life as full grown species and they procreated hence Darwin couldn't find the fossils since they didn't exist.
Good thing no fossils have been found since Darwin died. Dumbass.
truth teller wrote:
Why do you think those who belief that God did it is any more ignorant that to say millions of years ago a huge cosmic explosion created the universe.
Disregarding your piss-poor understanding of cosmology, the answer is a single word: EVIDENCE. Present some that backs up your claims, and you'll have been the very first to do so on the creationist side. Meanwhile, those of us on the rational side will continue piling up the fossils and DNA evidence, all of which confirms evolutionary theory.
truth teller wrote:
Why do you think I am any more ignorant than you are since you believe it came from nothing ( isn't that faith?) and I say I believe it was created by a powerful, creative and intricate designer.
Please identify the non-creationist who says the universe came from nothing. I guarantee nobody here who is arguing against creationism has ever said the universe came from nothing. However, creationists DO believe that the universe came from nothing. You're just assuming that everyone has the same wrong-headed stupid misconceptions about reality that you do. That's not OUR shortcoming.
truth teller wrote:
I wasn't there so I call it a belief. You weren't there and you believe it and you call it science. Where's the rationale?
Did John Wilkes Booth shoot Abraham Lincoln at Ford's Theatre?

Did the United States drop two atomic bombs on Japan to end World War II?

Did anybody ever set foot on the moon?

Did dinosaurs ever live on the Earth?

If you say "yes" to any of these, is it because it's a fact, or because it's a belief? What constitutes a fact, according to you?

“Pay it forward!”

Level 4

Since: Oct 09

Harrisburg

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#51884
Jan 14, 2011
 
Dogen wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep. Well stated
Thanks!

And I can't find your response to my previous question about DNA & visual representation - you said yes & no, and offered to educate me ... I'll take you up on that. Do you need me to find that post?(I can look harder for it ...)

“What, me worry?”

Since: Mar 09

I'm a racist caricature!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#51885
Jan 14, 2011
 
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, but it's not my theory and I won't presume to define someone else's theory for them. What I have gained from the Hannity/Limbaugh school is not to do what they do. It seems that you are better positioned to speak for the theory of evolution. I do agree that a crisp definition would be helpful. It could save us from arguing some points upon which we actually agree.
So, you admit you don't even know what it is, but you've got the nerve to argue that it's incorrect anyway. How do you know you don't actually agree with it if you don't even know what it is?
KAB wrote:
Now as for an overall summary consideration of the evidence, from my engineering background...
Big EFFING surprise. An engineer who is a creationist and knows piss-all about biology. I'm just amazed that this could even be. This just NEVER happens. Do you know why you don't like evolution? Because it doesn't close like math does. The Bible offers a beginning-end closed explanation. There isn't any such comforting comprehensive totality in evolution. It's open-ended at all times. And, because your brain type prefers the hard and fast number-crunching only-one-solution answers of mathematics, biology is very hard to understand for you and doesn't give you the warm fuzzies that math does. Well, tough titties. What your brain likes has shit-all to do with how reality works. Grow up.

Level 2

Since: Jun 08

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#51886
Jan 14, 2011
 
truth teller wrote:
Observation that replicate itself and form a similiar pattern create credibility. Thus a observed action can determine if a observation has credibililty. For example (simplified) push a book off the table it falls down and the similiar action prevail you can make a valid conclusion. If the book floats into the air then the first conclusion is nullified. But if in fact book fall off the table onto the floor you have observed gravity in action. Is that simple enough?
I believe you have it! You are speaking of "observed effects" - or "observable actions" of an unobserved phenomena - in this case a falling book providing evidence for the Theory of Gravitation. This is good.

Now - let's extend this to the Theory of Human Evolution. The "observed effect" or "actions" of human evolution are the 25 different species of fossil hominids. Their pattern shows a change from ape-like to human-like over time. If these fossils fell into a different pattern - like your book floating in air - then human evolution could be nullified. But they don't - they fall into the exact pattern of change in which you would observe human evolution in action - just like your example of the book falling to show gravity in action. And each new fossil found falls into this pattern.

So you were right! The repeated observations of the actions/effects of human evolution - those homininid fossils - continue to fall into the same pattern predicted by evolutionary theory, thereby creating credibility.
KAB

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#51887
Jan 14, 2011
 
TedHOhio wrote:
<quoted text>
We are always looking at the evidence concerning evolution. One of the reasons, one of the many reasons, evolution is such a strongly held theory is because all things discovered since Darwin's day has supported evolutionary theory. Objections raised against evolution, particulary in recent years, have not been based on sceince but on religion; Creationism, Creation Science, and Intelligent Design are three examples.
Before we get to ALL let's try taking it ONE thing at a time.
What is one thing which supports evolution theory?
MIDutch

Waterford, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#51888
Jan 14, 2011
 
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
Before we get to ALL let's try taking it ONE thing at a time.
What is one thing which supports evolution theory?
Wow. You have REALLY not been listening, have you?

Pick one, any one.

There have been MILLIONS, if not BILLIONS, of "things" which support evolution that have been found in the last 200 years or so.

It would be a LOT simpler to ask what supports the "alternative" (hint: the answer is NOTHING).

“I am evolving as fast as I can”

Since: Jan 08

Brooklyn, in Dayton OH now

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#51889
Jan 14, 2011
 
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
Before we get to ALL let's try taking it ONE thing at a time.
What is one thing which supports evolution theory?
How about the Paleontological fossil record?

If you don't like that one, how about centuries (yes, I mean centuries) of study of comparative anatomy?

If that one still bugs you, try Genetics?

If you prefer to range further from biology itself, how about physics and Radiological dating techniques?

How about Climatology and ice core samples?

Try Geology and Rock layering and formations?

How about Astronomy and the formation of the Earth?

WHat about Ecology and Environmental sciences?

We can always go back to Biology and hit on Biological diversity?

Hit a good Agricultural college and study up on animal and plant breeding programs.

Under each of these ... categories, for lack of a better term, there is details support that aligns itself well with evolutionary theory. It would take so little to cause evolution to collapse. The discovery of one rabbit into a dinosaur's stomach or a modern man's remains found in a geological level dating to several million years -- but in 150 years of looking, no one has found anything that conflicts with evolutionary science, not Sanford, Morris, Ham, or Holvind -- for all their bluster about it.

You haven't either, and you level of bluster certainly pales beside your heros.
Dogen3

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#51890
Jan 14, 2011
 
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
Before we get to ALL let's try taking it ONE thing at a time.
What is one thing which supports evolution theory?
The entire scientific fields of:
Biology
Archeology
Genetics
Anthropology
Paleontology
For starters.
You can also add in physics, chemistry, biochemistry, botany, virology, epidemiology,....
Oh, you said ONE thing. My mistake.
With one thing you can play the Mr. Magoo game and refuse to see the forest for the tree just in front of you.
No thanks, we have played before.

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#51891
Jan 14, 2011
 
SsixtytwoS wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks!
And I can't find your response to my previous question about DNA & visual representation - you said yes & no, and offered to educate me ... I'll take you up on that. Do you need me to find that post?(I can look harder for it ...)

Oh, I remember you asking the question but I had little time and figured someone else would jump on it. But if you can refresh me I will be glad to take a whack at it.

“Religion is Superstition”

Since: Aug 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#51892
Jan 14, 2011
 
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
Before we get to ALL let's try taking it ONE thing at a time.
What is one thing which supports evolution theory?
How about the whole of the biological sciences?

How about all of science?

Maybe you could try and name one thing that supports 'goddidit'?

Since: Nov 07

St. James, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#51893
Jan 14, 2011
 
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
Before we get to ALL let's try taking it ONE thing at a time.
What is one thing which supports evolution theory?
evolution.berkeley.edu

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#51894
Jan 14, 2011
 
KAB wrote:
<quoted text>
Before we get to ALL let's try taking it ONE thing at a time.
What is one thing which supports evolution theory?
Logic.

“Science is the waytof truth”

Level 1

Since: Aug 10

Earth

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#51895
Jan 14, 2011
 
marksman11 wrote:
the Cambrian explosion proves that evolution does not have to occur over long periods of time as we've previously demanded. IT CAN HAPPEN SUDDENLY!!!
Except that this is not a claim made by scientists but a distortion on your part. The cambrian "explosion" took about 50 MILLION years. It is only explosive in that it is a striking feature within the slow forming strata.

And this is how it always is. Nothing of the real world supports your crazy view, so you pretend that science says something others than what it really does. This does not help your case, it only exposes the desperation of your position.

“Science is the waytof truth”

Level 1

Since: Aug 10

Earth

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#51896
Jan 14, 2011
 
marksman11 wrote:
<quoted text>AND AGAIN, you weren't there, nor was the person who taught you this, THEY WEREN'T THERE EITHER!!
You said.....
<quoted text>
Yes they are.
You weren't at the creation of the earth, and neither were the folks who wrote genesis. But an 4.64 billion year old oblate spheroid earth is consistent with all the physical evidence, whereas a flat earth surrounded by magic waters and covered by an inverted dome to keep them out is not.

“Science is the waytof truth”

Level 1

Since: Aug 10

Earth

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#51897
Jan 14, 2011
 
marksman11 wrote:
A fossil is evidence that something once existed, died, and left an image of itself. It doesn't show heritage...I can strow cards on a table, and if allowed to arrange them myself
A series of fossils, that progressively transform from one form to a related form to another related form over time, as measured by multiple overlapping means, DOES imply inheritance. And where genetic evidence is available, it conclusively confirms the correlation, allowing us to reliably carry it back into the distant past.

A book of bronze age myths does not imply historical fact.

“Science is the waytof truth”

Level 1

Since: Aug 10

Earth

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#51898
Jan 14, 2011
 
marksman11 wrote:
Why is it that I have asked numorus atheists to give me one example of the humanist manifesto that they reject, and none, including you, have done so? Why can't you do that?
The Humanist fanifesto is indeed a statement of beliefs. Some are empirically provable (if anything is) and some are not. I reject the seventh "Religion consists of those actions, purposes, and experiences which are humanly significant. Nothing human is alien to the religious. It includes labor, art, science, philosophy, love, friendship, recreation--all that is in its degree expressive of intelligently satisfying human living. The distinction between the sacred and the secular can no longer be maintained." This is not an empirical truth but an asserting, an attempt to redefine religion in a way that is presumably more paletable to rationalists. All well and good, but most atheists define religion as "everything having to do with baseless belief in majic" and reject the concept out of hand.

I also reject the hourteenth, " that existing acquisitive and profit-motivated society has shown itself to be inadequate and that a radical change in methods, controls, and motives must be instituted. A socialized and cooperative economic order must be established to the end that the equitable distribution of the means of life be possible. The goal of humanism is a free and universal society in which people voluntarily and intelligently cooperate for the common good. Humanists demand a shared life in a shared world."

I believe this to be nonsense, that neither pure socialism nor pure capitalism can be just, and that many of our modern American problems stem from the artificial and childish polarization between the two, rather than the common sense acceptance that a just society must be an alloy of both, and that arguing over where and when to set the balance it the perpetual and legitimate work of free men--in other words, not radical but minor adjustments are called for and not just now, but for all time.

“Religion is Superstition”

Since: Aug 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#51899
Jan 14, 2011
 
Is markie still (deliberately?) hung up on the Humanist Manifesto?

I wonder why he's suddenly focusing on that particular piece of irrelevance? Maybe to draw attention away from the epic failure that the rest of his non-argument is?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 51,221 - 51,240 of132,982
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••