No, you have not. You have merely attempted to backtrack and soften your claims while still not coming up with anything substantial.<quoted text>
I answered that back when you asked it but I think it was another thread.
But I will repeat it. Both sides lie/have lied in general.
So are you telling me that no scientists, no one that has researched for proof of evolution has ever lied about their research? Falsified their research? Falsified their findings? You can't be that naïve.
Here are some concrete examples of creationists / IDers being caught in actual lies, some of which were used by creatards right here.
Lie: Coe and Prevot's work in fluctuations in a single magnetic reversal event supports the idea of daily reversals during a "flood" period.
Lie: The RATE deliberate attempts to fool radiometric daters show radiometric dating is unreliable.
Lie: There are no intermediates in the fossil record.
Lie: The nested hierarchy is a made up system that can be applied to any collection of objects.
Lie: We can calculate the odds against abiogenesis (when we do not even know the proposed process)
Lie: The flagellum and the clotting cascade are irreducibly complex.
Lie: All multicellular creatures appeared at the same time in the Cambrian Explosion.
Lie: hypervariable parts of the mtDNA can be used to calibrate the rate of change of the slower mutating parts of the mtDNA
Lie: spiral galaxies cannot maintain their shape for billions of years
Lie: life violates the second law of thermodynamics
Lie: junk DNA is a core and necessary part of the theory of evolution
You cannot come up with anything remotely comparable to that list up there, just off the top of my head, only feeble attempts to soften your claim without retracting it.
Now I have posted this list on TWO threads just so you cannot keep avoiding the issue.