Anti-Abortion Bill Wants to Warn Women About Non-Existent Cancer Risk. Why Stop There?
The bill is likely designed to be unconstitutional under current law because it imposes an undue burden on women who seek abortions.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at Plunderbund.
#1 Jun 15, 2013
Add your comments below
|Why Atheist Richard Dawkins Supports Religious ... (Jun '17)||23 min||lightbeamrider||4,980|
|What's your religion?||3 hr||was auch immer||106|
|It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09)||6 hr||ChristineM||165,438|
|"Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12)||6 hr||lightbeamrider||85,623|
|Humans evolved from Canadians||21 hr||Mystic science||1|
|Evolution of the Tennessean species||21 hr||Mystic science||1|
|Experiment In Evolution, Genetic Algorithms and...||23 hr||was auch immer||10|
Find what you want!
Search Evolution Debate Forum Now
Copyright © 2018 Topix LLC