Really? Because yesterday you said ERV's were showing homology, not common ancestry. And I pointed out that you've been claiming (without evidence to back yourself up) that "homology was a refuted argument!"<quoted text>
DNA homology is a debunked argument...a true embarrassment to evolutionary theory. You have not proven relatedness... You've only imagined it...and all of your predictions to validate that hunch have FAILED.
Just goes to show that you're using all these big words without even understanding what any of them mean.
But if they HAD failed, you'd be able to explain orthology for us.
(sound of crickets chirping)