Should evolution be taught in high sc...

Should evolution be taught in high school?

There are 178622 comments on the www.scientificblogging.com story from Feb 24, 2008, titled Should evolution be taught in high school?. In it, www.scientificblogging.com reports that:

Microbiologist Carl Woese is well known as an iconoclast. At 79 years of age, Woese is still shaking things up. Most recently, he stated in an interview with Wired that...

"My feeling is that evolution shouldn't be taught at the lower grades. You don't teach quantum mechanics in the grade schools. One has to be quite educated to work with these concepts; what they pass on as evolution in high schools is nothing but repetitious tripe that teachers don't understand."

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.scientificblogging.com.

“Don't be mad at me.”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

I'm just a little bunny.

#156540 Oct 12, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
Learn to read the text contents. As I said "Mans Gods and beliefs 15,000 years ago may not....." MAY NOT being the key words there which is the same as I am not sure, I don't know,,,, get it yet dipshyt.
You state that man's religious beliefs of 15,000 years ago "fell along the same lines" as Christianity. That is not a speculative statement. I point that out since you don't seem to have the ability to even understand what you post.

Again, where is your data backing this up. You being such a smart little boy, I know you have supporting data.

Come on DUMMY, give it up.

“Don't be mad at me.”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

I'm just a little bunny.

#156541 Oct 12, 2013
Apparently Christ was alive 15,000 years ago and going by a different name.

“If It Is Possible”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

It Will Likely Happen

#156542 Oct 12, 2013
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>I'm sorry, but you upset so easily. You should learn to thicken your skin.
You have no idea what religious beliefs man had 15,000 years ago. You are just talking out your ass.
Have another drink Dan. "May not" means don't know. When you sober up you will figure it our but then again you MAY NOT. LMAO

“Don't be mad at me.”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

I'm just a little bunny.

#156543 Oct 12, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
Have another drink Dan. "May not" means don't know. When you sober up you will figure it our but then again you MAY NOT. LMAO
So you can't address actual discussion and criticism of your declaration. I take that to mean you agree that you were talking out your ass.

Thank you.

“Don't be mad at me.”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

I'm just a little bunny.

#156544 Oct 12, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
Have another drink Dan. "May not" means don't know. When you sober up you will figure it our but then again you MAY NOT. LMAO
I am aware you don't know. That is my point.

“If It Is Possible”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

It Will Likely Happen

#156545 Oct 12, 2013
DanFromSmithville wrote:
Apparently Christ was alive 15,000 years ago and going by a different name.
Again you need to learn to read. I will say it again as I have said it more than once in my prior comments.

"They may have not called it Christianity but in was along the same lines and many of it was before Jesus was even a thought."

Key words there "before Jesus was even a thought"

You just keep looking more of a fool Dannyboy. LMAO

“Don't be mad at me.”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

I'm just a little bunny.

#156546 Oct 12, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
Again you need to learn to read. I will say it again as I have said it more than once in my prior comments.
"They may have not called it Christianity but in was along the same lines and many of it was before Jesus was even a thought."
Key words there "before Jesus was even a thought"
You just keep looking more of a fool Dannyboy. LMAO
If you are making a claim that religion was along the same lines 15,000 years ago as it has been over the last 2,000 years then you need to support that with evidence. Come on Dummy, you have followed to this thread long enough ago, to know how it works.

Your petty, childish name calling and lies aren't going to cut it.

“If It Is Possible”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

It Will Likely Happen

#156547 Oct 12, 2013
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>I am aware you don't know. That is my point.
No you asked me to tell you what their thoughts were 15,000 years ago when I clearly stated in by comment "may not have been" other wise I already said I did not know.

Nice try to cover up your ignorant mistake of lack of reading or understanding.

“If It Is Possible”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

It Will Likely Happen

#156548 Oct 12, 2013
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>If you are making a claim that religion was along the same lines 15,000 years ago as it has been over the last 2,000 years then you need to support that with evidence. Come on Dummy, you have followed to this thread long enough ago, to know how it works.
Your petty, childish name calling and lies aren't going to cut it.
Dan was a dog a dog 15,000 years ago or when ever it became a dog. That would be a yes. It may have changed a little but it still a dog. Do you get it yet. beliefs may have changed over the past 15,000 years but it is still along the same lines of what people believe and have faith in and in what God the follow.

“If It Is Possible”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

It Will Likely Happen

#156549 Oct 12, 2013
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>
Your petty, childish name calling and lies aren't going to cut it.
LMAO. I called you dipshyt "once". It was not a name to call you but more of how you are acting. You looking for more attention and pity again trying to act like you are being attacked. LMFAO

“Don't be mad at me.”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

I'm just a little bunny.

#156550 Oct 12, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
LMAO. I called you dipshyt "once". It was not a name to call you but more of how you are acting. You looking for more attention and pity again trying to act like you are being attacked. LMFAO
Knowing you as well as I do, I didn't expect you to provide any support for your claims, but I thought I ought to at least give you the opportunity.

I can see that all I am going to get from you is this tactic you use to avoid an honest answer.

Well then, I guess we can ignore you drivel on religion as nonsense and move on.

“There is no Truth in Faith”

Level 5

Since: Dec 08

nowhere near a pound of $100's

#156551 Oct 12, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
Uhm no. I was saying you got nothing. Christianity is just a name labeled on peoples actions and beliefs. Before the word Christianity one can safely bet there was another word for it.
Like Hinduism or Zeusism??

“If It Is Possible”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

It Will Likely Happen

#156552 Oct 12, 2013
You claimed "Your petty, childish name calling and lies aren't going to cut it."

I responded with "LMAO. I called you dipshyt "once". It was not a name to call you but more of how you are acting. You looking for more attention and pity again trying to act like you are being attacked."

Now you again try to change the subject. Step up little man and back what you claim and accuse me of.

“If It Is Possible”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

It Will Likely Happen

#156553 Oct 12, 2013
Ooogah Boogah wrote:
<quoted text>
Like Hinduism or Zeusism??
I don't know Ooogah. But they certainly had some name for it.

“Don't be mad at me.”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

I'm just a little bunny.

#156554 Oct 12, 2013
replaytime wrote:
You claimed "Your petty, childish name calling and lies aren't going to cut it."
I responded with "LMAO. I called you dipshyt "once". It was not a name to call you but more of how you are acting. You looking for more attention and pity again trying to act like you are being attacked."
Now you again try to change the subject. Step up little man and back what you claim and accuse me of.
You clearly are not going to offer any substantive evidence of the religions of 15,000 years ago are you. You aren't even going to try.

I am not doing anything but asking for your evidence. You have done everything to avoid providing it.

“There is no Truth in Faith”

Level 5

Since: Dec 08

nowhere near a pound of $100's

#156555 Oct 12, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't know Ooogah. But they certainly had some name for it.
An over active imagination perhaps?
Believer

Manchester, TN

#156556 Oct 12, 2013
Dogen wrote:
<quoted text>
I gladly respond to honest questions with honest answers.
Work out the thinly veiled hostility with yourself and get back to me.
I think you would have to agree that the majority of people who consider themselves "Christians" (followers of Christ) believe that He was the person the New Testament writers believed Him to be.
You have said on this forum that you consider yourself a Christian. You have also said that you do not believe Jesus was the Christ/the prophesied Messiah of the Old Testament/and not one of the three individual "persons" of the Trinity.(Maybe not in so many words, so if I have misunderstood, please tell me.)

You have either missed my question or chosen not to answer why you feel comfortable calling yourself a Christian, and who or what you believe God to be, since you say you believe in God.

I hope there is no hostility in my heart toward you personally or anyone else on this forum for that matter. One of the things that keep this forum interesting to someone like me is how you guys can disagree over the same issue over and over, yet continue to try to get your point across to the other side.

The name calling gets a little ugly sometimes, but for the most part I find it funny to hear (what I imagine to be mostly very intelligent, well educated grown men) calling each other names you probably haven't used in speaking directly to anyone since high school ( or maybe drunk, as the case with Chimney last week).

“If It Is Possible”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

It Will Likely Happen

#156557 Oct 12, 2013
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>You clearly are not going to offer any substantive evidence of the religions of 15,000 years ago are you. You aren't even going to try.
I am not doing anything but asking for your evidence. You have done everything to avoid providing it.
I have answered this like 3 times now. What part of me saying "I don't know" do you not understand? I am sorry but I can't draw that out in crayon for you on here. You are just going to have to learn to take the context for what it means.

And just a heads up. If you ask me again I will just repost this answer for it is self explanatory to any one that can read.

“If It Is Possible”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

It Will Likely Happen

#156558 Oct 12, 2013
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>You clearly are not going to offer any substantive evidence of the religions of 15,000 years ago are you. You aren't even going to try.
I am not doing anything but asking for your evidence. You have done everything to avoid providing it.
You are like one way or another. but instead of endlessly repeating "science by Jim Ryan" with you it is "stupid questions from DanFromSmithville" You just keep doing/asking the same thing and expecting different results. Yes that was said by a man in our history. You figure it out.
Believer

Manchester, TN

#156561 Oct 12, 2013
Dogen wrote:
<quoted text>
Reverse the positions of the word believers and atheists (and reread your post).
The hardest place to see a mountain is on the mountain.
Well, I tried that and it made no sense to me.
On top of the mountain you can see so much more.
And you may be able to see many more mountains AND the one one which you are standing with a much better understanding of what a mountain really is. Wouldn't you agree?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 3 min Charles Idemi 164,818
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 2 hr NoahLovesU 19,150
proof of gods existence .....or lack there of 6 hr Dogen 112
News It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09) Mon dirtclod 141,472
How would creationists explain... (Nov '14) Mon MikeF 490
When is Quote Mining Justified? May 31 Zog Has-fallen 28
Christian Theology and the Natural Sciences are... May 30 Zog Has-fallen 1
More from around the web