Usually many mutations over several generations. Also, the 'information' is usually just *changed*, not added.<quoted text>
This is absolute total NONSENSE" for you are claiming to no someone that the rest off the world does not... This observance has never taken place. Evolution is a process of we're one species, "evolves" into another". This theory happens via a mutation of information being added
Why do so many fundies talk about carbon dating as if it was the only dating method? Why do they always seem to think it is relevant to dating most fossils? Well, guess what? it is very far from being the only dating method. And it is completely irrelevant for dating anything over 50-100,000 years (depending on the technique). If you understood the method, you would understand why..... you show me this "mutation" process were a creature of its own kind, has been observed "evolving" Into another kind. You cannot.... You also went onto say 'fossil records'.(The old carbon dating) malarkey!
Yes, raw carbon dating has its issues. They are dealt with via calibration with other methods. Now, what do you have to say about potassium-argon dating? Or rubidium-strontium dating? or fission track dating?Well if you new anything about this method the gentleman who designed this way of measuring the age of "something" said that this way itself is (FLAWED)
Yes, we understand that many sea animals do not get their carbon source from the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Instead, it comes from very ancient carbonate rocks (for seals, this is via shellfish, I believe). And yes, that is one thing that invalidates a C14 date.remember the seal lion they dated,(came up 250,000 years old..... It was still alive.
If you read Collins in 'great detail', then you know he considers creationists and IDers to be completely wrong. He understands that evolution happened-his own work has verified it many times.Petrifaction this method can be carried out in a matter off days. Not thousands of years. But don't get me wrong i am not saying evolution is a total whitewash, I am saying this. Natural selection and the (survival of the fittest). Well Mr Darwin got it wrong" Oh and I read Francis S Collins book' with great detail". A man who findings changed the hearts of the hardiest Atheists such as Anthony Flew!