That's the problem with Jimbo, he constantly insists that no-one can refute his work, but everyone does - he just ignores it and then spams it again.<quoted text>
That's not how science works. It's not about making shit up and then it's true until someone disproves it. If what you say is true, you can demonstrate that it's true via experiment. Now, what experiments have you performed, and please explicitly describe how you did it and the results you got. Be specific.
Until you do that, it ain't science. It's just you ranting like a half-retarded nutcase.
The lunacy I can tolerate, it's the dishonesty and cowardness that grates a bit.
(Notice how he ignores any posts that directly contridict his 'science'- as I say complete coward)