Evolution has NOT been observed in DNA.
Incorrect. Evolution is found in many ways in DNA. I listed only a few of them.
<quoted text> DNA has been ASSUMED to validate evolution based solely on philosophical arguments.
Incorrect. Again as I have already noted. Evolution makes predictions and in DNA we find that many of those predictions are correct.
<quoted text> Take ape DNA, for example. What would you predict chimp DNA would look like if evolution were false?
If evolution were false we don't even know if DNA would exist. But since there are no other scientific theory of origins the question is rather moot.
<quoted text> All you can say is that chimp DNA is "consistent" with evolution. It is also entirely consistent with ID, so you have nothing.
By ID you mean creationism. Just call it what it is. ID only fools people already gullible enough to fall for creationism.
Creationism cannot predict anything therefore it predicts nothing. See writings of Karl Popper for details.
DNA is not only consistent with evolution but evolution also makes predictions about what will be found in DNA.
<quoted text> Your contention that ID is not science is IRRELEVANT. I never said it was, so why do you keep beating a dead horse?
Then why bring it up in a scientific discussion? The best way to refute a scientific theory is with another scientific theory that better explains the data. Why try to weave creationism into the mix when it is not science?
<quoted text> Evolution has been observed in the laboratory?
Yes, directly once and indirectly thousands of times.
<quoted text> You invariably fail to define "evolution". Lenski's experiment does not provide the slightest hint of evidence that man evolved from a microbe.
Again with the straw-man.
<quoted text> So why do you persist in ridiculous, unwarranted extrapolations?
Because they are facts. You hate the facts so you try to distort what they mean.
<quoted text> Evolution has been "observed" in the fossil record? That is patently false. Only by selective interpretation of data, which is scientific fraud.
This is just a lie. To prove it then try explaining the fossil record with creationism. Make sense? why not? Because with creationism you have species A which dies out then species B is created created which is ALMOST identical but not quite. Then species B which dies out then species C is created created which is ALMOST identical but not quite. Then species C dies out then species C is created created which is ALMOST identical but not quite.......
<quoted text> Evolution is NOT falsifiable by your criteria. Any obstacle, such as those I've presented, will be immediately rationalized away by the contention that either my imagination or credulity is insufficient, or that man has not yet figured out how nature can be constrained to the predetermined paradigm of Darwinism. Every single challenge that I've presented is swept under the rug without being answered.
All false. Evolution is easily falsifiable.
You want me to repost the list so you can try again?
I bet you do just a poorly the second time.