Should evolution be taught in high sc...

Should evolution be taught in high school?

There are 180279 comments on the www.scientificblogging.com story from Feb 24, 2008, titled Should evolution be taught in high school?. In it, www.scientificblogging.com reports that:

Microbiologist Carl Woese is well known as an iconoclast. At 79 years of age, Woese is still shaking things up. Most recently, he stated in an interview with Wired that...

"My feeling is that evolution shouldn't be taught at the lower grades. You don't teach quantum mechanics in the grade schools. One has to be quite educated to work with these concepts; what they pass on as evolution in high schools is nothing but repetitious tripe that teachers don't understand."

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.scientificblogging.com.

“See how you are?”

Level 5

Since: Jul 12

Earth

#141903 Jul 10, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>WOW! I hadn't thought of it that way, because the bottom raises when the receiving container gets at the low point and then shuts back after the water has emptied.
Well, that's the problem with reinventing the wheel. There's a lot of "hadn't thought of" inherently involved in the process.
One way or another

United States

#141905 Jul 10, 2013
How to prove lenski lied. Breed bacteria in a double chamber that is well ventilated. Put small amounts of bacteria in each chamber. Feed the bacteria their normal food in the center of both sides, but on one side, add a small piece of citrus, furtherest away from their food.
One way or another

United States

#141906 Jul 10, 2013
Science has become morons for money, as the gov's paid lackies of evolution, make complete idiots out of college grads, to kill religion, so the already fully corrupted gov, can usurp religions power.

Fruking morons.

“There is no Truth in Faith”

Level 5

Since: Dec 08

nowhere near a pound of $100's

#141907 Jul 10, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
There is a company (AUTOSIPHON®) that has designed new siphon control tecniques, which allows for easy priming and control of very large and long siphon lines.
And yet, you still won't do it yourself. That's a whole lotta faith you don't have in your own idea, ain't it?

“What, me worry?”

Since: Mar 09

I'm a racist caricature!

#141908 Jul 10, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>There would be nothing to harm the fish, if the inlet was channeled and screened and the outlet could be far enough downstream to have it positioned away from the river.
Remind us how this is better than a waterwheel.

“There is no Truth in Faith”

Level 5

Since: Dec 08

nowhere near a pound of $100's

#141909 Jul 10, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>There would be nothing to harm the fish, if the inlet was channeled and screened and the outlet could be far enough downstream to have it positioned away from the river.
It's a good thing there is no such thing as turbulence or fluid friction, huh?? Oh!! Wait!!.....

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#141910 Jul 10, 2013
SonRisen wrote:
Living fossils - evolutions forgotten species.
http://webecoist.momtastic.com/2009/12/29/liv...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =xTo941JrtcwXX
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
The fossil record has too many holes and is missing way too many transitional fossils.
"Living fossils" in no way harm the theory of evolution.

Why do you think they would?

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#141911 Jul 10, 2013
SonRisen wrote:
Mutations are more likely to be harmful or damaging rather than helpful. Mutations in genes can either have no effect, alter the product of a gene, or prevent the gene from functioning properly or completely.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutation
http://ic.pics.livejournal.com/priroda_su/145...
http://ic.pics.livejournal.com/priroda_su/145...
The big bang theory. Something exploded and caused order. Explosions don't cause order, they cause destruction/dis-order.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explosion
http://www.bing.com/images/search...
Bad genes quickly die out. Good genes are preserved. As long as we get some good genes that is all that is required for evolution.

The Big Bang was not an explosion.

Quit getting your "science" from lying creatard sites.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#141913 Jul 10, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>Deflect that with channels.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluid_dynamics

Come back in a couple of months when you've finished looking up the big words.

“What, me worry?”

Since: Mar 09

I'm a racist caricature!

#141915 Jul 10, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>When large volumes are involved, one container receiving this is more effecient.
Prove it. Build a scale model and prove it. Put up or shut up.
One way or another

United States

#141916 Jul 10, 2013
Two questions.

If the Big Bang was not an explosion, why are all galaxies traveling at hundreds of thousands of miles per hour?

In other words, if there was no Big Bang to propel the galaxies to such speeds, what did and show evidence.

The next is, if galaxies travel so fast, how did individual planets settle into a place in one

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#141917 Jul 10, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>When large volumes are involved, one container receiving this is more effecient.
http://www.jaynecotten.com/images4/water_whee...

“GOD ALMIGHTY”

Since: Aug 12

Falmouth, UK

#141918 Jul 10, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
Bad genes quickly die out. Good genes are preserved. As long as we get some good genes that is all that is required for evolution.
The Big Bang was not an explosion.
Quit getting your "science" from lying creatard sites.
on the big bang thing turns out she's right,
for a picture of a big bang look at my profile picture.

your wrong about your good gene/ bad gene synopsis.
because there is three horses in the race good / bad / evil
all three have their backers their support groups their cheer
leaders.

all three have strong positive reasons for success.

“GOD ALMIGHTY”

Since: Aug 12

Falmouth, UK

#141920 Jul 10, 2013
MikeF wrote:
<quoted text>
For your Wiki source:
"It is believed that the overwhelming majority of mutations have no significant effect on an organism's fitness."
Better have that foot looked at.
<quoted text>
Again, from your Wiki source:
The Big Bang is not an explosion of matter moving outward to fill an empty universe. Instead, space itself expands with time everywhere and increases the physical distance between two comoving points.
You might try reading this stuff first.
cock it mike f
and wikipedia can screw it too.
both smell to me as bull [email protected]
bull [email protected]

“GOD ALMIGHTY”

Since: Aug 12

Falmouth, UK

#141922 Jul 10, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>When large volumes are involved, one container receiving this is more effecient.
in heaven my penis is going to bigger than a mile long
just as well because,
there is only so much you can do with a
10" bully beef.
i figure because my actual height is the only concrete
thing so far as i can tell,
888 feet tall
this must make my bully beef,
at least 40% of a mile long?
aye dicklesses everywhere.

“What, me worry?”

Since: Mar 09

I'm a racist caricature!

#141923 Jul 10, 2013
One way or another wrote:
Two questions.
If the Big Bang was not an explosion, why are all galaxies traveling at hundreds of thousands of miles per hour?
In other words, if there was no Big Bang to propel the galaxies to such speeds, what did and show evidence.
The next is, if galaxies travel so fast, how did individual planets settle into a place in one
Your ignorance doesn't change the laws of physics.

“See how you are?”

Level 5

Since: Jul 12

Earth

#141924 Jul 10, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>It is a system with elements that work that way.
Expansion and explosion are not at all the same.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#141925 Jul 10, 2013
the dark lord wrote:
<quoted text>
cock it mike f
and wikipedia can screw it too.
both smell to me as bull [email protected]
bull [email protected]
Thanks for your input. Flushing it now.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#141926 Jul 10, 2013
the dark lord wrote:
in heaven my penis is going to bigger than a mile long
Now all you'd have to do is find a woman a mile thick.

“GOD ALMIGHTY”

Since: Aug 12

Falmouth, UK

#141929 Jul 10, 2013
ChromiuMan wrote:
<quoted text>
Expansion and explosion are not at all the same.
stare at my profile picture and weep.
an atom is expanding itself into a cosmos proven by nasa.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 10 min replaytime 58,041
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 11 min Eagle 12 27,260
News It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09) 23 min Subduction Zone 159,260
News Nonsense of a high order: The confused world of... 2 hr Tom Brady 1,844
News Intelligent Design Education Day Sun replaytime 2
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) Sun replaytime 219,597
News Betsy DeVos' Code Words for Creationism Offshoo... Feb 16 scientia potentia... 1
More from around the web