Should evolution be taught in high sc...

Should evolution be taught in high school?

There are 179706 comments on the www.scientificblogging.com story from Feb 24, 2008, titled Should evolution be taught in high school?. In it, www.scientificblogging.com reports that:

Microbiologist Carl Woese is well known as an iconoclast. At 79 years of age, Woese is still shaking things up. Most recently, he stated in an interview with Wired that...

"My feeling is that evolution shouldn't be taught at the lower grades. You don't teach quantum mechanics in the grade schools. One has to be quite educated to work with these concepts; what they pass on as evolution in high schools is nothing but repetitious tripe that teachers don't understand."

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.scientificblogging.com.

FREE SERVANT

Ashburn, VA

#140925 Jul 5, 2013
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>Apparently, a high school drop out knows more than the people educated in various fields of science and engineering.
It's a miracle.

“Seventh son”

Level 8

Since: Dec 10

Will Prevail

#140926 Jul 5, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>If that person is near a large pond or lake above him/her also, a siphon can produce energy for him or her.
More likely to produce a bad taste in their mouth. lol

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#140927 Jul 5, 2013
One way or another wrote:
<quoted text>
Yea, that made sense--sarcasm off. By definition, I am an engineer.
.

No. You are not.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#140928 Jul 5, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>We began going over ways of using water as a power source a few days ago. Siphons totally power themselves.
Nope. You're as much an engineer as Ryan.

“Dinosaurs survived the flood!”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

Jesus probably rode dinosaurs!

#140929 Jul 5, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>It could be more versitile because the outlet can be positioned anywhere you need it to be, as long as it is below the inlet.
Yes, but this would not make it 100% efficient or free.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#140930 Jul 5, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>It could be more versitile because the outlet can be positioned anywhere you need it to be, as long as it is below the inlet.
Don't you think it would be easier and more efficient to convert the water to energy at the source than piping it all over creation??? Energy would be easier to move than water, putz. That's why they don't build hydroelectric dams in the middle of a city rather than on a freaking river!

“Dinosaurs survived the flood!”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

Jesus probably rode dinosaurs!

#140931 Jul 5, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>It's a miracle.
A delusion.
Believer

Manchester, TN

#140932 Jul 5, 2013
LowellGuy wrote:
<quoted text>
Right, like creationists who think they know everything about evolutionary theory, yet demonstrate abject ignorance of the subject when questioned about it. Your Bible quote, which essentially says "everybody who disagrees with you is stupid, so don't get upset if people tell you your religious beliefs are nonsense," isn't evidence of anything except apologetics and rationalizations...the same kind used by cults throughout history.
That you could infer from anything I have written that I think those who don't agree with me are stupid, just shows how unreasonable you are. Reason, look it up. Now I know why you people continually call each other dishonest. You can lie by deliberately distorting what someone else has said.
Seems there is a lot of that that goes on here and it "kinda does" make everyone look stupid.
FREE SERVANT

Ashburn, VA

#140933 Jul 5, 2013
MikeF wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't you think it would be easier and more efficient to convert the water to energy at the source than piping it all over creation??? Energy would be easier to move than water, putz. That's why they don't build hydroelectric dams in the middle of a city rather than on a freaking river!
At times water may not be running from an overflow of a pond or lake, a siphon will run as long as there is water over it's inlet.
FREE SERVANT

Ashburn, VA

#140934 Jul 5, 2013
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>Yes, but this would not make it 100% efficient or free.
It is 100% self powered though.

“Dinosaurs survived the flood!”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

Jesus probably rode dinosaurs!

#140935 Jul 5, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>At times water may not be running from an overflow of a pond or lake, a siphon will run as long as there is water over it's inlet.
So you are proposing that a siphon be used to create a flow of water beyond a natural or man made dam in a body of water. Then this flow can be converted to electricity with a turbine. The electricity can be distributed to wherever, to do work.

Now isn't this what is done to create hydroelectric power? Without using a siphon of course.

“Dinosaurs survived the flood!”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

Jesus probably rode dinosaurs!

#140936 Jul 5, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>It is 100% self powered though.
What about changes in atmospheric pressure acting on the siphon?
FREE SERVANT

Ashburn, VA

#140937 Jul 5, 2013
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>So you are proposing that a siphon be used to create a flow of water beyond a natural or man made dam in a body of water. Then this flow can be converted to electricity with a turbine. The electricity can be distributed to wherever, to do work.
Now isn't this what is done to create hydroelectric power? Without using a siphon of course.
As I said, it can be used anywhere water is, as long as there is enough of it and there is a drop in elevation between the inlet and the outlet.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#140938 Jul 5, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>At times water may not be running from an overflow of a pond or lake, a siphon will run as long as there is water over it's inlet.
A) That swoosh was what I said flying over your head.

B) And, no, the water will run so long at the water as the inlet is *ABOVE* the outlet.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#140939 Jul 5, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>It is 100% self powered though.
Wrong.

Were does the energy come from to start water flowing?

Where does the energy come from to keep the water flowing?

Where does the energy come from to raise the source water above the height of the outlet?

“Dinosaurs survived the flood!”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

Jesus probably rode dinosaurs!

#140940 Jul 5, 2013
MikeF wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong.
Were does the energy come from to start water flowing?
Where does the energy come from to keep the water flowing?
Where does the energy come from to raise the source water above the height of the outlet?
I have been doing some reading on the subject of siphons which seems to be the failing of Free Servant and Jim. They come up with some idea and never bother to hit the books to see what has been done.

From my reading it sounds like you would have to have a great elevation between the source reservoir and the outlet in order to overcome the cost to run a turbine and a generator to make it worthwhile.

Servant is talking about larger scale, but he doesn't seem to be thinking large scale.

“Dinosaurs survived the flood!”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

Jesus probably rode dinosaurs!

#140941 Jul 5, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>As I said, it can be used anywhere water is, as long as there is enough of it and there is a drop in elevation between the inlet and the outlet.
As I stated in a response to Mike, I have been doing some reading and it sounds like it couldn't be just anywhere there is a difference in source elevation to outlet elevation. It sounds like there is a minimum difference and it would vary depending on demand and the number of turbines and generators used to convert the mechanical energy to electricity.

In addition, if your siphon overcomes the replacement rate of water into the source, you will run out of source and thus your supply of electricity. As you stated siphons can drain ponds and lakes. This free electricity is starting to sound more and more like the electricity I am paying for now.
One way or another

United States

#140942 Jul 5, 2013
Ooogah Boogah wrote:
<quoted text>
A technician can build a prototype to drawing specs. That doesn't make him an engineer. Especially since he still thinks he can build a perpetual motion machine or design better things than have ever been done before just because he can build a prototype.
Actually, if I were to give some in my industry a distinguishing assignation in engineering, it would be in wave form technology.

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#140944 Jul 5, 2013
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>What if you called the energy the rock possesses, potential energy since the energy isn't released until it is thrown. You know if you added a wheel barrow to bring the rocks back up, you could increase the efficiency.

Wow. Even more free energy.

You know, if we cleared the other side of the mountain and built a road up to the top and but some giant (bigassed) dump trucks we could increase efficiency even more.

Free energy for everyone!

“Dinosaurs survived the flood!”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

Jesus probably rode dinosaurs!

#140945 Jul 5, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>I was thinking about how the weight of the water could increase in a container which could turn a shaft. It is nothing to do with the speed of the water flow, it is the volume that matters.
It sounds like you are proposing to siphon water into a reservoir and then tap into this second reservoir to generate electricity. So what is the point of siphoning when you could just tap the primary source?

Siphons as I am finding out, do not operate based on a difference in weight between one side of the U-tube and the other.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 12 min Thinking 35,012
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 17 min ChristineM 14,939
News It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09) 24 min ChristineM 151,326
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 26 min Aura Mytha 199,369
News ID Isn't Science, But That's the Least Of Its P... 3 hr DanFromSmithville 36
Ribose can be produced in space Mon JanusBifrons 6
A Simple Simulation Mon JanusBifrons 1
More from around the web