The dogma of mutations producing complex adaptations is a myth that has been propagated for decades to justify the tenets of Darwinism.<quoted text>
And a lying idiot at that who cannot be trusted without a link. I gave only one of the many articles that will tell you how dogs evolved. They have new genes. A separated species cannot help but to develop new genes since we all undergo mutations like it or not.
We know what the mutation rate is for various species, it can be measured quite easily. We can even tell how long ago closely related species separated by how big the difference is between their genomes.
Now here is a question for you. How can we measure that difference and get a year without there being differences present?
I will grant that you are sane. Right now you are the most idiotic sane person we have here. I don't know how you would judge the intelligence of the insane, but Jimbo is still the clear cut winner of a combination of insanity and stupidity.
Mutations are beneficial in science fiction movies...not in the real world.
Teenage mutant Ninja turtles and their rat mentor emerge out of a sewer in fairytales.
In the real world, mutations result in a depressed immune system, non-viability, cancer, etc.
You cannot effectuate positive change by random rearrangements of genetic code. It is mathematically impossible, regardless of whatever power you ascribe to natural selection and genetic drift.
All you can do is hide behind the "millions of years can create anything" fantasy.