There may be absolute truth, but you can only hope to know an approximation of it, and even if you find an absolute truth you cannot be sure you have done so. The only exceptions are:<quoted text>
Yeap! Since reality/nature is an absolute truth your pseudo-scientific method donít need to be talking about nature/reality because it is an absolute truth! YOUR SCIENTIFIC METHOD THAT SCIENCE USES IS DISQUALIFIED BECAUSE NATURE/REALITY IS NOT FALSIFIABLE BECAUSE NATURE DOESNíT CONTRADICT ITS SELF!
ON THE COONTRARY, IF THE INFORMATION MAN/WOMAN SPEAK OF REALITY/NATURE CONTRADICTS ITS SELF IT IS THE ONLY THING THAT CAN BE PROVED AS FALSE NOT NATURE/REALITY!
You discover and find other absolute truths off of the other ones and the first one is accepting and knowing nature/reality is an absolute truth and formulate the scientific method law of non-contradiction found in nature NOT BY MAN/WOMAN because nature donít contradict its self and neither should the information MAN/WOMAN put out when they speak of nature/reality! The law of non-contradiction is a flawless scientific method validated off of how nature works!
- in the realm of formal logic and math, we can establish truths based on agreed premises. But this is abstract and in a sense circular.
- you know you are aware, now. Cogito Ergo Sum. The is where observable certainty ends.
But in the real world where our understanding of what is true depends on our imperfect and approximate perceptions and models of reality, we can only approximate. Thankfully we can use non-contradiction as one falsification criterion. Science will tell you we can often eliminate the false, but cannot be sure of the true.
Tough luck, for all your grandiose delusions.