Should evolution be taught in high school?

Feb 24, 2008 Full story: www.scientificblogging.com 176,193

Microbiologist Carl Woese is well known as an iconoclast. At 79 years of age, Woese is still shaking things up. Most recently, he stated in an interview with Wired that...

"My feeling is that evolution shouldn't be taught at the lower grades. You don't teach quantum mechanics in the grade schools. One has to be quite educated to work with these concepts; what they pass on as evolution in high schools is nothing but repetitious tripe that teachers don't understand." Full Story

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#126180 Mar 31, 2013
HTS wrote:
<quoted text>Neither evolution nor ID should be taught as science. Both are religion.
Every mechanism of evolution is not empirically observable in nature. How can you make such a statement?
Evolution is imagined to occur.

what mechanism of evolution cannot be observed?

[Hint: we discovered these mechanisms by observation]


p.s. Gravity is just imagined to occur.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#126181 Mar 31, 2013
HTS wrote:
<quoted text>Neither evolution nor ID should be taught as science. Both are religion.
Every mechanism of evolution is not empirically observable in nature. How can you make such a statement?
Evolution is imagined to occur.
And how many times do we have to explain to you that this claim is incredibly wrong.

You know that we listed at least four different ways that evolution has been observed. You have not debunked any of those ways.

Repeating lies on your part does not make them true.
susanblange

Norfolk, VA

#126182 Mar 31, 2013
Dogen wrote:
<quoted text>
No.
God's wife is Asherah. Or his mistress in some Semitic and pre-semitic writings.
Just an FYI.
As for the rest of your "theology" I suggest you take it up with a psychiatrist.
Asherah is a pagan tree god and I believe in the living God of Abraham. Lilith was Adams first wife and Eve was his daughter. Just because someone doesn't agree with you and tries to enlighten you doesn't make them crazy.
Russell

Adelaide, Australia

#126183 Mar 31, 2013
HTS wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong, SZ...
Go to your Bible talkorigins
Well put, HTS

Its his bible alright

I suspect he has printed off a copy of the whole site and carries it around with him like a security blanket of sorts

He probably has several copies of what he thinks are the "good bits"....

These he keeps under his pillow, no doubt

Which is why he is forced to sleep bolt upright

....and also why he is frazzled each morning and half asleep all day long
Russell

Adelaide, Australia

#126184 Mar 31, 2013
Dogen wrote:
<quoted text>
I admit I catch you lying a lot less that HTS. HTS simply cannot sit down and type without lying. He actually believes quote mining to be okay and we are nit picking when we call him on it.
That is the sort of people you have on your side.
Just because someone says things that you don't like, and to which you have no valid response, does not constitute lying on their part

Since: Mar 13

New Malden, UK

#126185 Mar 31, 2013
You don't teach kids in school that the easter bunny is real nor that Santa is real why do they continue to teach kids this crap about religion, it should be up to the parents to guide their offspring. But yes teach them about evolution
HTS

Williston, ND

#126186 Mar 31, 2013
Dogen wrote:
<quoted text>
what mechanism of evolution cannot be observed?
[Hint: we discovered these mechanisms by observation]
p.s. Gravity is just imagined to occur.
The creation of complexity through random mutations.
HTS

Williston, ND

#126187 Mar 31, 2013
Dogen wrote:
<quoted text>
Gravity has no science behind it.
See, I can say things like that too. They are more true for gravity than evolution so actually I make the better argument.
Dogen, can't you come up with some actual science?
Your repetitive parroting of the same irrelevant analogy is getting annoying.
I know it's become fashionable to compare evolution to gravity, but the comparison is asinine.
There's a difference...
Gravity is observed.
Evolution is not.
Rather than simply swallow all of the BS on talkorigins, I suggest that you for once engage in scientific study and logic.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#126188 Mar 31, 2013
HTS wrote:
<quoted text>
The creation of complexity through random mutations.
What do you mean by "complexity"?

You try to hide your bullshit by using undefined terms.

And you also lie by only mentioning halve of the driving force of evolution. You would be right if it was random mutations alone, but you know it is variation along with natural selection that drives evolution. It is exceedingly dishonest to leave out one of the two driving forces.

We know that selection and variation can add new traits. It has been observed in nature and in the lab. Its history in the past show up in the DNA genome and in the fossil record.

So in what way do you mean that evolution cannot add "complexity"?
HTS

Williston, ND

#126189 Mar 31, 2013
Loki101 wrote:
You don't teach kids in school that the easter bunny is real nor that Santa is real why do they continue to teach kids this crap about religion, it should be up to the parents to guide their offspring. But yes teach them about evolution
Why would you support teaching evolution in science classes?
Evolution has no more validity than the theory of the Easter bunny or Santa Claus.
The scientific method is trashed, probability concepts perverted, and ridiculous unwarranted extrapolations accepted without scrutiny.
Worst of all, data is systematically filtered, which constitutes scientific fraud.

In the end, the entire theory of evolution relies on the dogma: Regardless of the complexity, evolutiondidit with pixie dust.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#126190 Mar 31, 2013
HTS wrote:
<quoted text>Dogen, can't you come up with some actual science?
Your repetitive parroting of the same irrelevant analogy is getting annoying.
I know it's become fashionable to compare evolution to gravity, but the comparison is asinine.
There's a difference...
Gravity is observed.
Evolution is not.
Rather than simply swallow all of the BS on talkorigins, I suggest that you for once engage in scientific study and logic.
It is clearly meant to.

Perhaps he will quit when you see that it is not an irrelevant analogy.

And lying does not help your case. Once again evolution is observed in the laboratory, in the field, in the fossil record, in the genome, and in dozens of different phylogenic trees.

The reason that evolution is observed in so many different places is one of the reasons that it is considered to be just as much of a fact as gravity is.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#126191 Mar 31, 2013
HTS wrote:
<quoted text>
Why would you support teaching evolution in science classes?
Evolution has no more validity than the theory of the Easter bunny or Santa Claus.
The scientific method is trashed, probability concepts perverted, and ridiculous unwarranted extrapolations accepted without scrutiny.
Worst of all, data is systematically filtered, which constitutes scientific fraud.
In the end, the entire theory of evolution relies on the dogma: Regardless of the complexity, evolutiondidit with pixie dust.
Now you must know that you are lying. Even the conservative judge at the Dover trial knew by the end of the trial that evolution is science and ID is not.

You can repeat your lies as much as you like, you are not making Jesus happy.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#126192 Mar 31, 2013
And HTS, how are you going to recognize "real science" when you can't even recognize scientific evidence?

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#126193 Mar 31, 2013
susanblange wrote:
<quoted text>Asherah is a pagan tree god and I believe in the living God of Abraham. Lilith was Adams first wife and Eve was his daughter. Just because someone doesn't agree with you and tries to enlighten you doesn't make them crazy.

I know who Adams first wife was. You think I was born yesterday and believe that P.C. Eve crap? Eve was not their daughter.

Asherah was the consort of YHWH, AKA the God of Abraham.......

http://news.discovery.com/history/religion/go...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asherah

"In a nutshell, the hub-bub is about certain archaeological finds (most notably Kuntillet Ajrud and Khirbet el-Qom) bearing inscriptions that mention Yahweh by name and “his asherah”(or, more accurately,“asheratah”). The conclusion is drawn that Yahweh had a wife. But matters are far more complicated than that. Here are the options."

http://michaelsheiser.com/PaleoBabble/2011/03...

The quote and last reference link are more for fun than serious theology.


You DO know these are just old stories, right?

They are stories with meaning in them, not literal history.

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#126194 Mar 31, 2013
Russell wrote:
<quoted text>
Well put, HTS
Its his bible alright
I suspect he has printed off a copy of the whole site and carries it around with him like a security blanket of sorts
He probably has several copies of what he thinks are the "good bits"....
These he keeps under his pillow, no doubt
Which is why he is forced to sleep bolt upright
....and also why he is frazzled each morning and half asleep all day long

To date I have seen many creationist take pot shots at talkorigins, but they come up empty when it comes to disputing its science.

Try that and I will take you more serious.

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#126195 Mar 31, 2013
Russell wrote:
<quoted text>
Just because someone says things that you don't like, and to which you have no valid response, does not constitute lying on their part

No, I have DEMONSTRATED HTS to be lying on to many occasions.

He does not consider quote mining (aka lying) to be lying.



Valid responses are not the issue. Even when he is telling the truth he is a babbling idiot and refuting him is easy peasy. I have even seen him refute himself, which is an amusing creationist version of the hat trick.


“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#126196 Mar 31, 2013
HTS wrote:
<quoted text>
The creation of complexity through random mutations.

As "complexity" has been shown to be about as real as flying unicorns, even random mutation is overkill.

BTW, you are still using a straw-man version of evolution ("random mutations").

Why not try to say something intelligent or something you can support. Try to challenge me for a change. You can play with your little circle-jerk buddies some other time.

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#126197 Mar 31, 2013
HTS wrote:
<quoted text>Dogen, can't you come up with some actual science?

Can you recognize actual science? Since the answer is obvious I really don't see the point.

Your repetitive parroting of the same irrelevant analogy is getting annoying.

I know it's become fashionable to compare ID to evolution, but the comparison is asinine.

There's a difference...

Evolution is observed.

ID is not.

Rather than simply swallow all of the BS on creation.com I suggest that you for once engage in scientific study and logic.

If you are capable of it.

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#126198 Mar 31, 2013
HTS wrote:
<quoted text>
Why would you support teaching evolution in science classes?
Evolution has no more validity than the theory of the Easter bunny or Santa Claus.
The scientific method is trashed, probability concepts perverted, and ridiculous unwarranted extrapolations accepted without scrutiny.
Worst of all, data is systematically filtered, which constitutes scientific fraud.
In the end, the entire theory of evolution relies on the dogma: Regardless of the complexity, evolutiondidit with pixie dust.

Why would'nt you support teaching evolution in science classes?

Creationism has no more validity than the theory of the Easter bunny or Santa Claus.
The scientific method is trashed, probability concepts perverted, and ridiculous unwarranted extrapolations accepted without scrutiny.
Worst of all, data is nonexistent, which constitutes fraud.

In the end, the entire notion of creationism relies on the dogma: Regardless of the science, god done it with magic poofing.
susanblange

Norfolk, VA

#126199 Mar 31, 2013
You're forgetting that God the Lord is a woman and there is no sex in heaven, God doesn't have a mistress and is not gay. Eve was Adams daughter, she was called woman because she was taken out of man, from his side. You probably just want to blame Eve for the apple incident when it was Adam that talked her into it.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
"Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 2 min Brian_G 14,393
Why Are There No Transitional Animals Today? (Mar '09) 2 min Chimney1 767
The conditions necessary for homo sapiens to sp... 2 hr NoahLovesU 3
Ten Reason Why Evolution Is a Lie (Jul '09) 2 hr NoahLovesU 1,954
Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 2 hr Chimney1 141,620
Last ditch bid to ban creationism in Scottish c... Jan 22 TurkanaBoy 2
Exposing the impotence of the Neo-Darwinian theory Jan 21 jogos friv 2 10
More from around the web