And yet no matter how many times you are challenged you cannot list what he supposedly did wrong.<quoted text>
Why do you keep defending Ernie Haeckle?
He was an undisputed con artist.
Nevertheless, Ernie maintains a place of honor among the high priests of Darwinism.
When you claim that someone is a thief, but cannot say what he stole, when you claim that someone is a murderer, but cannot tell us who he killed, or if you call someone a con artist, but cannot tell us how he conned anyone, then you are guilty of making false allegations.
Exactly what did Haeckel do that was wrong?