Should evolution be taught in high school?

[Russell]

Subduction Zone wrote:

<quoted text>
Nor would you be able to clone animals, like has been done with "Dolly" the sheep.
HST will very often amaze me with statements that show why somebody, and it was not me, came up with a very apt explanation of what HTS is an anagram of.

And why have you named yourself "mud"...

I'll never understand you SubDud.....never

What has cloning a sheep got to do with genomic constraints?

[Mugwump]

Russell wrote:

<quoted text>
You are clearly not familiar with ANY science as science requires testability & repeatability
Where has animalutionism been tested and verified?

animalutionism?

You making up your own words now?

[KittenKoder]

Russell wrote:

<quoted text>
You are clearly not familiar with ANY science as science requires testability & repeatability
Where has animalutionism been tested and verified?

Fine, then reproduce a planet with life on it as diverse as Earth that's only 6,000 years old.

[Ooogah Boogah]

Russell wrote:

<quoted text>
You are clearly not familiar with ANY science as science requires testability & repeatability
Where has animalutionism been tested and verified?

No where!! It is is a creoturd fantasy concept. It has nothing to do with anything let alone evolution. So what?

[Ooogah Boogah]

Russell wrote:

<quoted text>
So where in the rich history of animal breeding have genetic constraints been overwhelmed or overreached?
All animals is themselves alone
Cows is cows
Horses is horses
Dogs is dogs
As I have said many times before...
Drosophila melanogaster should be an elephant with external testicles by now....

99% of all species that have ever existed are now extinct, even the ancestor species for all life that exist today. Is that enough overwhelming and overreaching for you?

[Mugwump]

KittenKoder wrote:

<quoted text>
Fine, then reproduce a planet with life on it as diverse as Earth that's only 6,000 years old.

Respect

:-)

[Subduction Zone]

Russell wrote:

<quoted text>
And why have you named yourself "mud"...
I'll never understand you SubDud.....never
What has cloning a sheep got to do with genomic constraints?

Go back and read the appropriate posts again tard.

How's That for Stupid could not understand how DNA is not a code and thought the readers of DNA would be different for every critter.

[Ooogah Boogah]

Russell wrote:

<quoted text>
So where in the rich history of animal breeding have genetic constraints been overwhelmed or overreached?
All animals is themselves alone
Cows is cows
Horses is horses
Dogs is dogs
As I have said many times before...
Drosophila melanogaster should be an elephant with external testicles by now....

And it seems what a Horse is ... has changed quite a bit over millions of years. Seems the first were about the size of a house cat. http://www.ecology.info/horses.htm

[Subduction Zone]

Russell wrote:

<quoted text>
So where in the rich history of animal breeding have genetic constraints been overwhelmed or overreached?
All animals is themselves alone
Cows is cows
Horses is horses
Dogs is dogs
As I have said many times before...
Drosophila melanogaster should be an elephant with external testicles by now....

Guess what, that is what the theory of evolution says too.

Except their language is bit more specific. It could be simplified to the statement that species do not cross clades.

Once a species is in a clade all of its offspring will be in the same clade.

Poor Rusty will not understand this. But then he has been in trouble ever since they introduced multiplication into math class.

[Russell]

KittenKoder wrote:

<quoted text>
Fine, then reproduce a planet with life on it as diverse as Earth that's only 6,000 years old.

Well Dahrl

As you can see....

My story is as good as your's

Difference?

Your's is parading around pretending to be science....

Mine has all the evidence

[Russell]

Mugwump wrote:

<quoted text>
animalutionism?
You making up your own words now?

Borrowed from a very clever person

[HTS]

Subduction Zone wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes, in many cases it can do so. It does not matter what the DNA "says" it follows the recipe in the DNA.
And what smokescreen? A reference so that you can start to learn is a smokescreen?

If DNA is not an inflexible code, explain the existence of identical twins.

[Subduction Zone]

HTS wrote:

<quoted text>If DNA is not an inflexible code, explain the existence of identical twins.

What? Identical twins have identical DNA. That does not mean that DNA is "inflexible code". You have not even defined "inflexible code". Once again it is better to think of it as a recipe. If you use the same recipe twice you will cook the same meal twice.

Change the recipe, but not the reader of the recipe and you will still have a different meal.

[Russell]

Subduction Zone wrote:

<quoted text>
Rusty fail, that is not what she meant.
Try again.

But this is precisely what I mean

Evo-desperation in yet another example---->

"....National Geographic introduced the world to the Tasaday first doing several magazine articles on them, then a CBS documentary."

http://www.h2g2.com/approved_entry/A750944

http://www-01.sil.org/~headlandt/caveppl.htm

Any hoax will do for evo-tards..... earnestly contending for their faith ........faith in lies

Here's another link about this stone age swindle--->

http://books.google.com.au/books...

[Subduction Zone]

Russell wrote:

<quoted text>
Well Dahrl
As you can see....
My story is as good as your's
Difference?
Your's is parading around pretending to be science....
Mine has all the evidence

Wrong again. You have demonstrated many times that you don't know what evidence is.

Would you like to learn?

We can help you with your deficiency.

[Mugwump]

HTS wrote:

<quoted text>If DNA is not an inflexible code, explain the existence of identical twins.

Seriously ????

A zygote (one set of DNA) splits into two embryos.

You can't be this stupid

[Mugwump]

Russell wrote:

<quoted text>
Well Dahrl
As you can see....
My story is as good as your's
Difference?
Your's is parading around pretending to be science....
Mine has all the evidence

So present your evidence your god.

Asked HTS as he said he had it - he was lying - maybe you can do better

[Russell]

Subduction Zone wrote:

<quoted text>
Go back and read the appropriate posts again tard.
How's That for Stupid could not understand how DNA is not a code and thought the readers of DNA would be different for every critter.

SubDud

You have a glaring disrespect for DNA

You really do

Mugwump is not happy and neither am I

HTS is miffed as well

We're all standing here staring at you with utter disapproval

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/8905048/multidi...

And please swallow your abject CREATION RACIST BIGOTRY

Seaman JD, Sanford JC. Skittle: a 2-dimensional genome visualization tool. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Dec 30;10:452. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-452. PubMed PMID: 20042093; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2817707.

And Oh yes, the link....for lazy bones

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/...

[Russell]

Ooogah Boogah wrote:

<quoted text>
And it seems what a Horse is ... has changed quite a bit over millions of years. Seems the first were about the size of a house cat. http://www.ecology.info/horses.htm

I may not be brilliant

But I ain't THAT stupid

Seems you are tho'

----------

Horse evolution is an absolute nonsense

C'mon Mugwump..

Back me up, or I won't share the copyright

http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/0...

http://creation.com/horse-evolution

[Russell]

Mugwump wrote:

<quoted text>
So present your evidence your god.
Asked HTS as he said he had it - he was lying - maybe you can do better

How badly do you want this?

There is no way I'm casting pearls before swine when it comes to the Lord