Your failure to understand evolution is embodied in your claim to know what is a "genetically superior human". I presume you have the usual cliche list of high IQ, emotional stability, strong muscles and bones, immune system, etc.<quoted text>
Excellent example. Survival of the fittest is an imaginary force that does not remotely reflect reality. If you just look at humans... the genetically superior are no more likely to successfully mate than the average person. Sanford emphasized this observation in his book.
You want to objectively estimate what constitutes fitness in modern society? Go to the nearest maternity ward and look at the babies. Perhaps, to your horror, fitness today means willingness to bear children who can parasitise the general population most effectively. Why not?
All's fair in love and war.