It's laughable to watch you try to defend a veritable quack in your desperate attempts to prop up your religion. If you were interested in science, you would plainly acknowledge the fraudulent nature of Haeckle's drawings. However, your quest for truth is superseded by your desire to defend your atheistic religion.
I have refuted this. You failed (for some strange reason) to even acknowledge I refuted this.
What are you afraid of? That you will have to find new material to tell lies about? Suck it up.
No one has made a successful case for Haeckle's drawings being fraudulent. If I am wrong then enlighten me.