"Evolutionists" DO admit it. If you ask a scientist about the ultimate origins of the universe, or multiverse, he will say we do not know, if you take the question back far enough.
Ask a religious person like you, and you will insist that you DO know and the answer is GOD. Yet that answers nothing.
Well, news flash. Nobody knows.
PS Nebraska man is such a joke - on you. It was not taken seriously by paleontologists even at the time...I had never HEARD of Nebraska Man until creatards started warbling about it. And Piltdown was discredited by evolutionists. And it was a century ago. Keep holding onto it though, its all you have in your mental blinkering against the overwhelming evidence of intermediate ape/hominid remains. That is the ONLY REASON you keep ranting about finds discredited before your grandaddy was born.
Incredible desperation. You have nothing.
The desperation lies firmly on the evolutionist side
This Professor Reiner Protsch von Zieten of anthropology has a lot of explaining to do
He had poor foolish evo-tards duped for 30 years....
He dated a 240 year old skull as 27,400
The skull when examined was actually still stinking
"Anthropology is going to have to completely revise its picture of modern man between 40,000 and 10,000 years ago,"
Another of the professor's sensational finds, "Binshof-Speyer" woman, lived in 1,300 BC and not 21,300 years ago, as he had claimed, while "Paderborn-Sande man" (dated at 27,400 BC) only died a couple of hundred years ago, in 1750.
"It's deeply embarrassing. Of course the university feels very bad about this," Professor Ulrich Brandt, who led the investigation into Prof Protsch's activities, said yesterday. "Prof Protsch refused to meet us. But we had 10 sittings with 12 witnesses.
Are you going to defend this chap with support for his shellac claims?
It would not surprise me at all
Its the usual evo-desperation
Defending the indefensible
What have we here:
Benítez-Bribiesca L, Modiano-Esquenazi M. Ethics of scientific publication after the human stem cell scandal. Arch Med Res. 2006 May;37(4):423-4. PubMed
Another failure for peer review
Don't believe everything you read Chimney
Jump ship now
As regards Piltdown man
It took from 1912 to 1954 to discredit this hoax
This is despite Franz Weldenreich declaring that the jaw was not human in 1923
Worst of all
Piltdown man was cited as evidence by Clarence Darrow in the fake Scopes trial in 1925