No, TalkOrigins just happens to be a VERY useful and reliable source. It debunks practically every creatard claim there is with references to peer reviewed science. Something that no creatard source can do. It is as useful when arguing against creatards as Clavius.org is when arguing against Lunar Landing Conspiracy Nuts:<quoted text>
You've nailed it HTS
If someone else has already done all of the work, and done it very very well why not use it?
I see you retards going again and again to the same idiotic creatard sites that openly admit they do not use the scientific method.
It is fine to openly say that you will defend a particular viewpoint. To do so and proclaim that you will ignore science is pathetic. Your sites do that.