Suck on the following idiot.:-) thanks for showing everyone you're too stupid to know when science makes you out a fool. Hahahaha<quoted text>
It turned out that you didn't actually know anything about C-14 dating nor even how it was proven to be accurate to within 3% of actual dates.
Carbon dating a lie
Tell us dumb shit, how much extra cosmic radiation is added into our atmosphere when a massive star explodes or implodes?
Is the rate of bombardment constant?
No. This is one reason why carbon dating ( http://www.sigmaxi.org/amsci/articles/00artic ...)(the carbon isotopes they measure are created by cosmic rays) is inaccurate, because it assumes that the rate is a constant, which is a typical gradualist way of looking at things. Evidence from a half-metre long stalagmite that grew between 45 000 and 11 000 years ago in a cave in the Bahamas, shows that the cosmic ray intensity for that period was double what it is today - see here or here for more info.
Read more: http://survive2012.com/index.php/cosmic-rays ....