Rubbish again. You are taking a loose statement by Birney and ignoring that his definition of functional just means any kind of biological activity at all. By that definition even the parasitical re-copying of itself by an ERV is "function".<quoted text>The pseudogenes paradigm also has collapsed. Virtually all DNA is now believed to be functional. Darwinism cannot make scientific predictions because its entire foundation is false.
Even Birney still agrees that only 20% of function is likely to be useful to the organism (and only 8-9% has actually been identified to date - 20% is an estimate).
So long as you guys continue to merely ride the coattails of real researchers and try to twist their words or meanings to suit yourselves, you will always be nothing more than a troublesome nuisance to those who even bother to listen to your drivel.